Lingerie line for kids to be launched

this is sexy and slutty to these guys.

Originally posted by Jinni
reply to post by SRHAZE420

 

Unfortunately the establishment, elite, government, civil service workers are FULL (not all) of people that 'like' this (like Aeons) so it is unlikely that you will get any help from them.

Judges give lenient sentences to pedaphiles why? because they are that too and they are promoting the degeneration of society all in the name of satanists NWO.

It isn't new. It has happened many times to ancient civilisations in the past and the same is happening again!

As long as there is people like Aeons in high positions of responsibility we are done for.

the Belgium justice system proofs you're point, and that was a blunder from their side.!!!!
MARC DUTROUX
www.trutv.com...

what kind of similar flaws that was swept under the carpet do you have in the USA ?

i guess like all of the world , its hidden with you're tax money.
still they make mistakes and leave traces of it, pick one up and go to the right judge

hacking people like that could (theoretical) give some info on that world.
just a thought, no intensive meant!






[edit on 3-2-2010 by telfyr]

reply to post by Aeons


Your kind is pushing a slutty dress code to young children.

It is NOT the children to blame but the parents and role models that influence them to do so.

If you are suggesting that anyone is displeased with seeing young children being treated in such a way are sexually attracted to girls then you have lost your mind and your logic in nothing but a way to push people to feel guilty when they try to put society right.

You have been caught out. You spurt nonsense without proof, you attack peoples religion and you are a disinfo agent.

Haven't you read the note yet?

reply to post by Aeons


Oh more trash eh?

It's dress code similar to pole dancers as mentioned previously by many other members already.

The girls are not sluts. I'm referring to degenerate clothing schemes.

A little girl in pink with a heart on it, and a poofy lacy jean skirt is slutty to you?

Fascinating. I am always fascinated by the narcisstics inability to see oneself.

You look at nine year old and see sluts. YOU.

then you back off. it is just the CLOTHING that makes you see sluts.

No dear. YOU see sluts.

Poofy lacy knee length skirts are not slutty.

Any person who isn't this demented should go up to the link of the image I put up at the top of this page and click and look at what this guy is calling "trash."

[edit on 2010/2/3 by Aeons]

reply to post by Aeons


You seem to be lacking some stars you deviant.

You should take that as a message.

Everyone here knows where society and media is trying to push the dress code and behaviour of young children. Just look at modern day schools, posters, adverts, disney and corporations. That's what is felt by people here NOT just the OP. We can see where society is heading and it's not a good place.

People like you need to be stopped before you ruin the innocence of young children.

reply to post by Aeons




you are fishing , not for discussion.
you just want to provoke to get an reply.
youre on a wave to off topic.


[edit on 3-2-2010 by telfyr]

reply to post by Jinni


I am happy to be known by the enemies I make.

[edit on 2010/2/3 by Aeons]

I think the girls are just having fun and their parents dont see any problem with that.
Aren't we a liiiiiittle bit overreacting in here? I mean, sure, if they're posing with "stripper" poles then that's not too good, but are you sure you aren't seeing it being a little more inappropriate than it was meant to be?
Also, whoever said that parents who buy the lingerie to their kids should be shot; How would you feel if I would say you should be shot because I disagree with your view on the subject? Human life is not to be joked about, I see that as much worse than little girls making lingerie.

Originally posted by telfyr
reply to post by Aeons

 

you are fishing , not for discussion.
you just want to provocative to get an reply.
youre on a wave to off topic.

No. I am completely ON topic. Right down to pointing out exact websites carrying the clothing line in question. I couldn't be more on topic.

reply to post by Aeons


well why are you trying to get others to disagree with youre thought?
looks like you are on that point just for the attention of it.

for me that is.

Originally posted by Crakeur
the mini miley was at her concerts here in NY a month or ago. I took my daughter and we were sitting a few feet from the back stage area and my daughter pointed her out. she looked like the offspring of Paris Hilton and Jon Benet Ramsey. It was disgusting. She was sporting a little dog in a bag, makeup that would make a hooker blush and clothes reserved for strip clubs.

Her image and her parents allowing it are both disgusting but, as pointed out, the line of clothes are actually not that bad. The use of the word lingerie in the title of the news item was done to garner attention and I find that as deplorable as the way this little girl dresses.

Oh I hate it when people put dogs in bags! It's just a horrid thing for any animal. I mean as a human being would you want to be stuffed in a damn bag?! I've got one of those pipsqueak tiny dogs. He hates that kind of crap. I think it says a lot about the person in question. A living being isn't a cute accessory. If someone isn't thinking about others as actually beings you have to wonder how they view themselves.

I do feel some pity for Cyrus though. As a person who worked in entertainment and around Nashville for years, I can't say this is all her doing. You guys have no idea the amount of pressure a lot of these "kid stars" are under. Miley is her dad's cash cow. He knows there's a point just like Britney Spears where she's going to have to "sex it up" to sell. It's just a slow shift to that and believe me she's probably under some degree of duress to tow that line.

The whole entertainment industry has gone mad though. When i first started working in 2000 the old timers were moaning about how everything was changing. No one had to be talented anymore. The songs were crap, the radio industry was crooked. I though it was all just old men crying. Oh man, how wrong I was. I knew one lady who couldn't get a deal for ages then just bought a pair of boobs. She landed a good deal after that. Never did get famous though. I just stick to Classical now. It's sane.

just for the fact of it.
(do not read this link if you're weak hearted!)

Shortly after Dutrouxs release from jail, young girls began to disappear around some of the neighborhoods where Dutroux owned houses. Police, during two different occasions, searched the Charleroi house owned by Dutroux. However, the police failed to search the house thoroughly. Hidden in a secret dungeon in the basement were two teenage girls hoping to be found. CNN reported some years later that during the time of the investigation into the missing girls, vital facts concerning the disappearances were kept from other police investigators. Moreover, during a high point in the investigation, a magistrate working on the case had forgotten to tell her replacement that children were even missing.

Other instances of police incompetence occurred between 1993 and 1996. Police ignored a tip from a Dutroux informant in 1993, in which he stated that Dutroux offered him between $3,000 and $5,000 to kidnap young girls.

www.trutv.com...

this is a factual story of horror
do not read it when you are unstable!


this is important!

Uh wow, I just clicked the link in the OP.

That's a stripper pole. You guys are rationalizing a bunch of 8 to 10 year old girls around a stripper pole?

I have no idea was the sex of my fetus is right now but i'm really hoping it isn't a female. I don't think I could handle raising a female in a society that thinks it's ok to have ten year olds playing "stripper".



[edit on 3-2-2010 by antonia]

reply to post by Vitchilo

This is just one more indicator of the enforced sexualization of children. It is nothing new, it has been slowly taking hold for over 20 years and what we see now is it getting closer to completion.

I have argued against this horrific trend but all other parents I speak with tell me I am too old fashioned and need to get up with the times. They see no problem with sex education in schools of their 9 or 10 year olds, and, they say it is necessary so that children are informed for any possible worst case scenario.

For the life of me I do not see why CHILDREN need to have this information when they are still Children. I see that if we give children this information then a percentage will go and test it out.

What we need to give our kids is a CHILDHOOD, first. Then when they are emotionally and mentally matured to the point where they can handle this information by all means educate them, properly.

I blame all of us for allowing this to happen. Not enough parents stood up and said NO to the increased graphic violence and sex in the popular media.

Here in Australia I am at a loss to understand why we allowed so much of the Violent Video Games, the more negatively inspired Rap and Hip Hop music, "Reality TV", and apparently "Family" Entertainment illustrating what I call American Street Culture that places into the mind of our young that Girls are for PLEASING Boys, and Boys are to be like Soldiers.

Today we live in what can only be described as a modern Sodom and Gamorrah (sp) where parents think their little daughter looks "cute" dressed as a pop singer on MTV, when in fact they only look like little "whores".

I do not understand how it is that "Stars" like a well known Hotel Heiress with their unashamed porn videos on the internet are seen as being good role models for our daughters, or, how it is that Violence is being portrayed to our sons as the only way to deal with every situation in life!

America's little sweethearts, the Olsen Twins are a prime example of this trend. Have you ever read their books or seen their movies? Did you notice how they could sneak out and night to be with boys when 10 years old in their movies and the parent was wrong to discipline them? Did you read the back cover of their girls books where they tick if this book includes things like, How to cover for your friends, how to sneak out at night, how to lie, etc, etc, ad nauseum.

I do not understand why so many parents simply gave up argueing with their kids for the right reasons and began to Easy Parent, meaning to give them all they asked for and not to question any of it, to not check the ratings on games, music and movies.

To me, the kids I see roaming the streets at night, the girls drinking and getting pregnant at young ages are children who's parents simply DID NOT LOVE THEIR KIDS ENOUGH TO GO THE HARD YARDS WITH THEM!

I stood up, and was belittled by 99% of parents. I was informed that I should, as a Good Parent, watch those TV shows and listen to that music with my kids so we could discuss it...

Bullsplop people! A Good Parent does check ratings for their kids, does not allow unsuitable music, films, books, toys, clothing, etc, into their homes.

A Good Parent will go the hard yards with their children because they do love them more than anything in this world.

A Good Parent will ignore the laws about discipline and insure their kids are not carbon copies of all the mongrels roaming the streets.

A Good Parent will put their children first ahead of always working, ahead of chasing the dollar for more stuff to fill their modern lifestyle.

So what do you choose?

reply to post by Vitchilo


Yuck. More objectification of the American female. Will it never end? Bad enough Barbie sets incredibly high physical standards that can lead to body image problems but now we have the Cyrus sisters and their insidious stupidity under the guise of the 'wholesome' Disney name.

They start em off earlier and earlier with the obsessive need for make-up clothes and boys masking the shallow values under "Attitude" or individuality. Anyone remember those Bratz dolls, each of them looked essentially identical and wore the same slut-worthy clothes and yet each of them had their own hobby or personality to mask the sinister message under one of empowerment and individuality...

Now we're gonna have kids who should still be wearing feetie-pajamas running around in lingerie.

reply to post by Tayesin

I choo-choo-choose you...

Thanks for the thoughtful passage. Good points.

thats wrong.

get this thead to f%k !!!!

lingerie is erotica, and no place for it here, or anywhere.
why is this site even allowing this crap to be viewed ?

I know its wrong, and shouldnt happen.
But links to children in lingerie ? we are advertising this sh!t

reply to post by Vitchilo


I was about to say... why all the fuss? Until I saw the pictures.

Women not old enough (**or too old) to arouse libidinous feelings should not be allowed to try by wearing such clothes.

-rrr

reply to post by Vitchilo


This is sick, and the parents should have walked out when the company came up to them to promote this stuff.