Lingerie line for kids to be launched

reply to post by Vitchilo


Yep this is bad, no way around it this is awful. I'm sure some people will say that children have a right to express themselves and blah blah but there have to be limits.

What kind of parent would buy this stuff anyway? Are they actively trying to make their children targets for predators? Makeup is one thing, those t-shirts with "pornstar" and other rubbish written on them are too far but this ligerie stuff is just sick.

The parents of this 9 year old are obviously just money grabbing, morally bankrupt scum.

"Our collections are fun and funky". Do any of you actually know what funky really meant when the term was coined? I have been a musician since 1963 and I sure do. It should in no way shape or form be used in relation to children except maybe in the creation of them between two consenting adults. I remember when the childrens line of thongs were introduced by La Senza. The store was almost closed down at our local mall by irate mothers especially. Just what in Hell is going on in the minds of these people when they come up with these advertising campaigns? I watched that video of that little girl singing Smack It or whatever it was supposed to be and saw a child who is starved for love and attention and some real role models in her life.

the use of the term funky has changed dramatically in the last 50 years. Catch up.

reply to post by Aeons


There was a certain type of people throughout history that contributed to pushing society to the abuse of little children. Pompeii is one example which was destroyed by volcanic explosion and left people almost frozen in their deeds at the time of death. Many of those individuals were involved in sex acts with really young children. Sodom and Gomorrah is another and so on. Most civilisations met their end when they started to openly 'indulge' in sexually exploiting children.

It is clear that people like yourself contribute to the occurrence of such a degenerate society and I hope you NEVER have children as it is clear that you are not responsible and are in fact malicious.

I vote to Ban Aeons from ATS for her demented ideals!

P.S. I know that you are a psycho-warfare Agent Aeons and your dirty little tricks to fool people into accepting degenerate principles will not work here.

[edit on 3-2-2010 by Jinni]

reply to post by michial

"Our collections are fun and funky". Do any of you actually know what funky really meant when the term was coined? I have been a musician since 1963 and I sure do. It should in no way shape or form be used in relation to children except maybe in the creation of them between two consenting adults.

So how do you feel about "jazz"? Would it be OK if they said it was "fun and jazzy"?

reply to post by trouble_every_day


It's no conspiracy, it's exactly how things are.

www.independent.ie...

www.telegraph.co.uk...



[edit on 3-2-2010 by kindred]

This is sick. Is there anyway we can fight this? Public indecency? Endangering the welfare of children?

There has to be some sort of way beyond suing the company...notify all christian media outlets! They will raise some hairs...

Oh no. You are going to vote off the Island.

AND I get a status upgrade to Agent.

Its a good day.

[edit on 2010/2/3 by Aeons]

Originally posted by rnaa
reply to post by michial

 

"Our collections are fun and funky". Do any of you actually know what funky really meant when the term was coined? I have been a musician since 1963 and I sure do. It should in no way shape or form be used in relation to children except maybe in the creation of them between two consenting adults.

So how do you feel about "jazz"? Would it be OK if they said it was "fun and jazzy"?

i shook my head at first because i thought this said "jizz" and "jizzy"...subliminal messages, i see how you roll!

reply to post by Aeons




It takes a real mental case to say the nonsense that you spurt and it ain't normal.

It kinda reminds me of how Judges give lenient penalties to pedophiles and a golden hand shake.

Hmmm.... What 'kind' of people do that?

Originally posted by Jinni
reply to post by Aeons

 

There was a certain type of people throughout history that contributed to pushing society to the abuse of little children. Pompeii is one example which was destroyed by volcanic explosion and left people almost frozen in their deeds at the time of death. Many of those individuals were involved in sex acts with really young children. Sodom and Gomorrah is another and so on. Most civilisations met their end when they started to openly 'indulge' in sexually exploiting children.

It is clear that people like yourself contribute to the occurrence of such a degenerate society and I hope you NEVER have children as it is clear that you are not responsible and are in fact malicious.

I vote to Ban Aeons from ATS for her demented ideals!

P.S. I know that you are a psycho-warfare Agent Aeons and your dirty little tricks to fool people into accepting degenerate principles will not work here.

[edit on 3-2-2010 by Jinni]

just to add on this.

what do we know from history and abuse?
what has come to light in these times?
what is suported now by most of humanity?

what is this rapture in the thought of these child abusers ?
rapeture in their lives? or ?
and does a rape ture even have somthing to do with the biblical god?

i say its one bowl of soup.!

reply to post by SRHAZE420


Unfortunately the establishment, elite, government, civil service workers are FULL (not all) of people that 'like' this (like Aeons) so it is unlikely that you will get any help from them.

Judges give lenient sentences to pedaphiles why? because they are that too and they are promoting the degeneration of society all in the name of satanists NWO.

It isn't new. It has happened many times to ancient civilisations in the past and the same is happening again!

As long as there is people like Aeons in high positions of responsibility we are done for.

You look at a nine year old and see sex.

And you think *I* am the problem.

Good stuff coming from an Islamist.

reply to post by kindred


I'm not arguing about the existence of a sexualisation agenda.
The conspiracy "theory" I speak of surrounds the motivation for this sexualisation, not the observation.
I put it to you that it might not be "evolution" and it might not be "just the way things are". But then maybe it is, who really knows right?

reply to post by Aeons


Oh it's not over yet!

Here's another thing for you.

It's a note with the abbreviation 'F O' on it!

My my...it is a good day for you isn't it?

I can't believe that trash the support the degeneration of the only innocence left in the land (i.e. Children) are tolerated.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I don't know what the big deal is... Is it the word "lingerie"? Because these are just frilly, ruffled dresses for little girls, perfectly acceptable in public. By the way, this company has been around for 5 years.

Ooh! La, La! Couture

It must be the word Lingerie that's got everyone's panties in a twist (excuse the pun).

Go to the website... does that look NORMAL to you... I don't mean "normal" in a scene of what I or culture consider normal! THEY are CHILDREN.. what so now we have to even judge the way our children "LOOK" rather then helping then get beyond this materialist shallow perception? So what we should brain wash them to consider they need to worry about "how they look" and "how others judge them by their looks"

Something is really WRONG with this world if this sort of crap is being promoted for children to suffer through... no wonder so many of these celebs.s are all SNIP* Up... they start this route.. imagine now rest of the children across the country become SNIP* up at this age... what will our culture support next 20 -30 years?

Do you NOT see the implications?

None of these guys are concerned for the GIRL.

They are concerned about THEMSELVES.

There is an interesting conspiracy angle in there. Do you see it?

All we need to do is protect these poor guys from looking at nine year olds, thinking they are sexier than their wives, and putting them in an emotionally uncontrolled state. We need to change girls liking poofy skirts so that these fools don't become upset at their own thoughts.



[edit on 2010/2/3 by Aeons]

Originally posted by Aeons
You look at a nine year old and see sex.

.

Errr....No I don't.

Please find me anywhere where i said that? You can't because you are a lying disinfo agent of terror.

But you seem to think that dressing young girls like sl@ts to the pleasure of degenerate people like yourself is fine.


[edit on 3-2-2010 by Jinni]

A pedophile heaven is what Noah Cyrus is creating.

This will lead to soooooooo many court cases of young girls getting into trouble and young boys being defended in court on the grounds that they were "led" by this "attire". Young pregnancies, abortions, rape.

SLAP HER. SLAP HER NOW! Irresponsible fugly.

Then why are you calling them sluts?

Originally posted by Jinni

Originally posted by Aeons
You look at a nine year old and see sex.

.

Errr....No I don't.

Please find me anywhere where i said that? You can't because you are a lying disinfo agent of terror.

But you seem to think that dressing young girls like sl@ts to the pleasure of degenerate people like yourself is fine.


[edit on 3-2-2010 by Jinni]