It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
May I inquire, has there ever been such a retraction and purging from the medical community on any widely propagated and accepted medical report in the past?
Can we expect throngs of physicians to scour the 'facts' delivered by the medical society for other such cases; or is it only the vaccine link that merits such scrutiny?
Who from the Lancet made this monumental discovery of hoaxterism and fraud? From whence did the "new" information come,
and why did it take twelve years to figure it out.
I find myself wondering if this isn't precisely the kind of revisionism that historians warn us about?
You know, I am not arguing that the link was real or not. Only that the circumstances and execution of the "debunking" to be less than persuasive and irregular to the point of alarm.
You are definitely misinformed with your above quote. Here is an excerpt from a case won.
(source)
ANDREW WAKEFIELD, the former surgeon whose campaign linking the MMR vaccine with autism caused a collapse in immunisation rates, was paid more than £400,000 by lawyers trying to prove that the vaccine was unsafe.
The payments, unearthed by The Sunday Times, were part of £3.4m distributed from the legal aid fund to doctors and scientists who had been recruited to support a now failed lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers.
Critics this weekend voiced amazement at the sums, which they said created a clear conflict of interest and were the “financial engine” behind a worldwide alarm over the triple measles, mumps and rubella shot.
Originally posted by eventHorizon
Lancet is a tool.
By retracting this study - they finally unquestionably proved it.
It seems that elites want full compliance from us...
question vaccines - get ridiculed.
question government - get compared to Al Qaeda.