It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CIA moonlights in corporate world

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 05:59 PM
link   
Looks like the CIA is letting its best and brightest moonlight for corporations in order to make ends meet. They say this policy helps retain their top agents who would otherwise end up leaving for greener pastures.




In the midst of two wars and the fight against Al Qaeda, the CIA is offering operatives a chance to peddle their expertise to private companies on the side — a policy that gives financial firms and hedge funds access to the nation’s top-level intelligence talent, POLITICO has learned.

In one case, these active-duty officers moonlighted at a hedge-fund consulting firm that wanted to tap their expertise in “deception detection,” the highly specialized art of telling when executives may be lying based on clues in a conversation.

The never-before-revealed policy comes to light as the CIA and other intelligence agencies are once again under fire for failing to “connect the dots,” this time in the Christmas Day bombing plot on Northwest Flight 253.

But sources familiar with the CIA’s moonlighting policy defend it as a vital tool to prevent brain-drain at Langley, which has seen an exodus of highly trained, badly needed intelligence officers to the private sector, where they can easily double or even triple their government salaries. The policy gives agents a chance to earn more while still staying on the government payroll.

Politico.com



I guess it’s not such a bad idea so long as they don’t let their Black-Ops teams hire themselves out to the highest bidder. But we all know that would never happen.




[edit on 1-2-2010 by FortAnthem]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 07:12 PM
link   
reply to post by FortAnthem
 


And on top of that, it also enables the CIA to entrench themselves into the company and use the company clandestine to spy on it and other companies in the US and/or out of the US without warrants. This is a bad idea because sooner or later we will have CIA teams freelancing (which essentially they are doing now) all their expertise to the highest bidder. What ever happened to the "duty to country" that these men and women went into the job for. Capitalism or as I like to call it now Corporate Oligarchy (Corporatocracy). Where sliding, where sliding fast and when we hit the bottom everybody will see the curtain pulled and notice that this truly isn't democracy not anymore.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by hoghead cheese
 


You got that right, just another means for the CIA's "best and brightest" to become thoroughly fused within the corporate culture. While that may not seem too bad you have to wonder just how dedicated these agents are, if they're chasing the big money gigs in the private sector. If they pursue higher paychecks in the private sector how can we trust they're not availing themselves to some of the CIA's more clandestine and unsavory money making schemes.

And if this is going on in the midst of a "war on terror", who exactly is minding the store? "Sorry we missed last week's terror attack, Agent Smith, our best crytpo-analysis, was on a six-figure sabbatical at Goldman Sachs. But hey, we gave him a raise so maybe we'll catch the next one!"



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 08:36 PM
link   
Oh Mr Smith...

I'm trying to get ahead in business. Is it true what they say about hitting them in the kneecaps? How can I intercept his cell phone traffic? How do I plant kiddie porn on his computer.

Where do I wire payment?



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 08:39 PM
link   
Why work legit jobs on the side? It's easier for them to simply skim some off the top of the coke money.

2nd line, but said it all in the first.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by hoghead cheese
 


Good point. The CIA guys could use their position in the company to gather intel for the government without the company ever knowing.

They're double agents the company is paying to spy on itself.


reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


Unfortunately, in this day and age, it's hard to find anyone who's loyal to anything but the love of money.

It's a shame that patriotism and doing a job for the love of your country has gone the way of the dinosaur.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by FortAnthem[/i

It's a shame that patriotism and doing a job for the love of your country has gone the way of the dinosaur.


Our brave men and women abroad are laboring for precisely these reasons.
Unfortunately the people who are trying to convince them of this need a swift jackboot upside the head.



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 01:34 AM
link   
well this is really just cutting out the middlemen.
now businesses can hire the cia directly without going through a congressman first.
less money for congressmen?how did that happen??

Mc-sassinations anyone?



posted on Feb, 2 2010 @ 09:17 AM
link   
I guess no one should be surprised at all. Corporations have unfettered access to everything - our elected representatives and now our intelligence assets.


I guess the phrase that I found most disturbing was "deception detection" - Good Lord.
There's some hocus pocus for you.

However, no one will convince me that these newly revealed connections won't result in corporations having access to supposedly confidential military or governmental information that they can use for profit.

Corporations will stop at nothing to feed their greed and control our lives. This is the era of the CorpGov, Corptocracy, whatever - it's all just Fascism marketed nicely.



posted on Feb, 11 2010 @ 11:44 AM
link   
This is getting some attention. Congress may hold hearings and review the policy:

www.politico.com...




The intelligence community will send a report to Congress examining policies that allow employees to moonlight in the private sector for extra cash, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair told a congressional panel Wednesday.

"I'll make sure that we get a report to you," Blair said under questioning from Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) during a House Intelligence Committee hearing.

...Blair said the reports surprised him. "Sometimes I too am surprised about what I read in the press about my own organization, I will tell you," Blair said. He said some staff in the DNI's office teach at nearby universities, a trend he backs. House Intelligence Committee staff are looking at the policy. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein has said she intends to ask questions about the policy and that her committee is looking into it.



posted on Feb, 11 2010 @ 12:00 PM
link   
This reminds me of that film- wasn't it Mr. and Mrs. Smith? Former CIA/intelligence employees ended up working for private firms. I thought that was always going on. I guess this is another one of those Hollywood meets reality type things.



posted on Feb, 11 2010 @ 12:10 PM
link   
Holy crap, I thought this thread died out a month ago.


[edit on 11-2-2010 by FortAnthem]




top topics



 
1

log in

join