posted on Sep, 19 2010 @ 10:15 AM
So he's essentially saying science is wrong because it doesn't have an explanation for big foot, aliens, ufos, and whatever other paranormal
activity hasn't been directly explained? That is a pretty pathetic attempt to discredit science since science makes no definitive claims about any
of these topics since there is almost zero empirical evidence to test, which is contrary to what he's actually trying to claim here. Science does
not say aliens are flying the ufos, or that big foot has tea with Lord Pye every Sunday, but it doesn't make any claims that they aren't either.
If this guy can refute every single valid scientific fact, with empirical and repeatable tests, then we can say he has credibility, but to give
credibility to someone who rants about science being absurd because it may or may not support his views of the paranormal without any evidence is just
moronic and ignorant.