posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 06:01 PM
reply to post by genius/idoit
Originally posted by yourself:
Maybe we think the country stands a better chance of not going down the toilet if we don't have a criminal(fraud) at the helm.
Originally posted by IceHappy:
I would not have voted for the other side in case you are wondering, however, our boys overseas should be taking lawful orders from a lawful
Originally posted by vor78
It seems to me that it would be much, much more harmful to the country to allow a man who is ineligible to hold the presidency.
Now these three gems were made before I posted. As any person of reasonable cognitive skills can see, each of the statements above actually don’t
solely pertain to eligibility but also performance. Therefore, the question of, “Those who were eligible (who held the office) did they do such a
grand job?” is highly relevant to this topic. It opens the doors for us to compare and contrast the decisions of those who were “qualified” to
do the job (qualified based on citizenship) to those of someone who many believe is not qualified to do the job (again qualification would be based on
In closing, you can't even spell your name correctly so it's impossible for me to believe you'll comprehend the logic of this thread.
May OBAMA continue to be your LORD!
[edit on 1-2-2010 by EMPIRE]