It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yak055h
reply to post by oneclickaway
Anyway, if there was a conspiracy to hide his citizenship legal status it had to start with whoever vetted him before he could be put an the ballot. If I were a "birther" I would start there, identify them and investigate their motives/rewards.
peace................yak055h
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by vkey08
WE DID OUR OWN CHECKING!!
Im sorry what checking did you do?
You talk about the short form birth certificate online as a fake, and you reference the two "experts" online that are yet to truly reveal themselves and reveal their qualifications on a rightwing website.
You come up with a Kenyan birth certificate that turns out to be fake.
You claim both parents must be US citizens for a child to be a natural born citizen, yet you continue to fail to directly reference this out of the constitution.
You claim his grandmother said he was born in Kenya, yet on the actual audio tape:
1. She clearly denies he was born in Kenya and states he was born in Hawaii.
2. She is not his biological grandmother but his fathers third step mother.
3. The tape itself offers no proof that its actually her stating this, it just "claims" this woman to be her.
4. That Barack Obama is named after his father "Barack Obama" who is refered to in the same manner.
5. You claim his dual citizenship at birth disqualifies him, yet no where in the constitution have you referenced any such rule in the constitution.
You didnt do any checking. You just took whatever satisfied you personally interms of belief, not fact.
Originally posted by Emilymary
a man who is sitting in the American White house yet will not produce a birth certificate
all to support his right to hold an office without having to prove!! his eligibility under the American Constitution when asked.
yes, and? You do not have too be a muslim to attend a muslim school, nor do you have to be a member of the church of Rome to attend a catholic school...
You dont believe the PDF statement from Fukino herself, so you might as well go there and verify those statements in person.
Originally posted by vkey08
Actually I said none of the above in my statement..
My statement if you took the time to read it was directed at the person who used Snopes as an end all be all, and to everyone on BOTH sides that is using various biased internet sites
Originally posted by oneclickaway
Ahh, so you have, as predicted, suggested for the third time that I travel to Hawaii to verify something that cannot be verified…
Originally posted by Emilymary
Orly Taintz is far from the only one fighting through the court system
She is not even the first. That was Phil Berg,
Orly Taintz is an easy target for 'haters'.
In Britain Tony Blair is getting closer to a trial for war crimes.
Everything is covered up.
Yes for the fourth time. You cannot say the "hawaiians wont look at it" if you refuse to submit the copy to them for validation.
Your just escaping the effort of backing up your claims oneclick. I dont care what you "speculate" will happen, until you yourself have those Hawaiian authorities confirm that the online birth certificate is invalid and not sufficient, you have nothing.
Originally posted by oneclickaway
What copy would that be, who holds it, where is it?
"It's a valid Hawaii state birth certificate," spokesman Janice Okubo told us.
There you go,
Factcheck or the Soetoro
The document scanned by Factcheck is a ‘certification of live birth’, not a birth certificate.
Birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth) and Certificates of Hawaiian Birth are the primary documents used to determine native Hawaiian qualification.
The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for genealogical purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth
delusional world
except Soetoro
The only word I would accept
Just forward it to Fukino vai email and ask her whether this is a valid short form. She is after all director the Hawaiian health department.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by 4nsicphd
BOAC ran a Nairobi to Cairo-Heathrow route in the 60s, 4232 statute miles in just over 9 hours. Heathrow-NYC-Hawaii (KHNL) is 8435 sm, doable in about 16 mileshours.
Where is your source for this? There were no direct flights from Hawaii to Europe or Africa in the 60's. Even for airliners today it around a day to fly from Kenya to Hawaii so how can you its doable in 16 hours? How can you argue the flights back then were as fast as the flights today? Can you provide evidence of a flight from Hawaii to Kenya in under a day in the 60's? Your the one saying this theory is possible so wheres the evidence?
Heres a recount of a cost of flight ticket from DC to Ohio, and this was domestic in roughly the same region of the US mind you:
because all airfares were controlled by regulation. If a roundtrip ticket between Cleveland and Washington was $75 on one airline, it was $75 on all the airlines.
$75 in the 60's. By all means do the math of the cost between Hawaii and DC, let alone Hawaii-London-Kenya during those days.
Mrs Dunham was between 6-8 months pregnant, probably within the month of her due date given this theory is about her being in Kenya for afew days, here is todays policy on pregnant woman flying:
•Medical certificate required if traveling within four weeks of due date (American Airlines further specifies that this rule applies for a normal, uncomplicated pregnancy).
•Travel is not allowed within seven days before/after delivery for flights that are less than five hours in duration within the United States. Exceptions may be made if the passenger obtains a medical certificate and is cleared by American Airlines' Special Assistance Coordinator.
•For international travel (or over major bodies of water, as in travel to Hawaii), American Airlines advises against travel within a month of the due date unless she is examined and obtains a medical certificate within 48 hours of departure stating that she is fit to travel. Approval from American Airlines' Special Assistance Coordinator is required within ten days of the due date and seven days after delivery.
airtravel.about.com...
What doctor in their right mind in 60's would allow a woman soon to be due to get onto a lengthy flight with many stops to arrive in country where she would require a number of vaccines?? Infact, which airlines at that time would allow a pregnant woman to come aboard in such a late period?
You claim its possible, so put the evidence where your mouth is and bring up some sources.
A ticket issued in the 60s would be worthless today, since tickets expire and become valueless after a year from flight date
The ticket? I was refering to the cost. The cost of the ticket in dollars compared to today. What on earth made you think I was talking about the plane ticket? I was talking about the cost, not the plane ticket exclusively.
So what better way one click than for you to go ahead and contact the authorities themselves to verify the authenticity of this birth certificate. I mean, if its fake as you claim it to be, and if you insist there has been no proper validation, you would have no issue getting a verbal reply from them on the matter.