Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Norway Spiral : Case reopened - the anatomy of an event

page: 5
316
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:16 AM
link   

Using trigonometry, one can find the angles of objects, distances to them, and even how tall they are, as long as you find different sides. This is used in weather at times to tell how tall a thunderstorm top is. This is why this story fits directly into the weather.

The Norway Spiral event has been claimed by the Russian Military. The rocket was claimed to launch from the White Sea, heading northward. Armed with this data, a conclusion using the Google Earth software demonstrated the direction the photograph was taken from was the White Sea, and the trajectory was a ballistic missile track to the north.

So while it may look like something meteorological, or astronomical, the spiral was solved by using simple mathematics. The rocket, in this method, is calculated to be about 97 to 106 miles high when the photo was taken, which is the exact altitude range for missiles in their third stages.

ZCZC FA79
031230 UTC DEC 09
COASTAL WARNING ARKHANGELSK 94
SOUTHERN PART WHITE SEA
1.ROCKET LAUNCHING 2300 07 DEC TO 0600 08 DEC
09 DC 0200 TO 0900 10 DEC 0100 TO 0900
NAVIGATION PROHIBITED IN AREA

Additionally, a researcher at the Tromsø Geophysical Observatory (where they observe auroras) Truls Lynne Hansen is certain that the light was caused by a missile launch. "The missile has probably come out of control and exploded," Hansen was quoted in the Barents Observer. "The peculiar spiral shaped light pattern comes from reflection of the sun in the leaking fuel."
Visible in the images and videos is the sunlight just beginning to peek over the horizon which would have back-lit the fuel.

Another launch on November 1 also caused strange light phenomenon in northern parts of Norway, although not as spectacular as the one today. It also caused speculation as to the cause, but it came from the launch of a Sineva missile from the nuclear submarine in the White Sea.

Doug Ellison from UnmannedSpaceflight.com has created a video (updated and improved from his earlier version we had in our previous article) showing the morphology of a tumbling rocket stage throwing out unspent fuel in two directions. "This is a set of rendered views using 3DS Max to produce a coarse simulation of what may have occurred to produce the beautiful formation in the sky over Norway earlier today," he said.

The explanation is logical. The events preceding the spiral indacate a failed missle attempt. The effect has been seen before. WHy is everyone so anxious to come up with an over the top explanation? Rather than accept the explanation that fits? I thought we analyzed conspiracies no manufacture them out of thin air? Gotta get over this. It wasn't Haarp. It wasn't a wormhole, Matreiya, aliens or anything else.


Source 1

Source 2

Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 2/1/2010 by semperfortis]




posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:18 AM
link   
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


Listen, everyone is entitled to their opinion including you.

But you're missing my point I think. If you don't care, and you consider this topic a dead issue, or pointless to discuss any longer, then why even bother visiting this thread in the first place?? This thread is for those who are intent on putting forth an actual discussion and debate, not for those who offer stuff like:

"according to many friends of mine with REAL ENGINEERING BACKGROUNDS, the failed missile test theory makes about as much sense as a donkey impregnating a chimpanzee on Independence day."

This has NO VALUE. I just want to be sure you realize that. It wasn't worth the energy it took you to type it nor the energy it took me to read it. And I'm sure ATS could find better use for the bandwidth.

If you're going to go that far, then why not offer up some of the reasons why your supposed engineering buddies think that a missile theory is not valid here.

From what you posted, it seems like the only engineers you know are donkey engineers, which I don't think would have any use here.

If I'm sounding harsh it's because this thread represents what's good about ATS and why I still come here. But it's posts like yours which seek to go against what this site tries to represent, but has been sorely lacking as of late.

Have a good day.

[edit on 1-2-2010 by PhotonEffect]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:26 AM
link   
Thanks OP, your thread has renewed ATS from such recent dribble.

I as well initially thought along the same lines as you (eiscat) and spent a good 2 days doing research to come to the conclusion that it was a missile, your presentation is really awesome. It just goes to show you that preconception or snap judgments cannot stand up to actually doing hard work and figuring "stuff" out.





At one point I, half in jest, suggested that the spiral was indeed evidence of electronic counter measures.


I suspected this as well, just on a hunch, it brings up a very interesting topic. Just last week a U.S. general ( forget name) was talking about how vulnerable gps and satellite reliant data is on the modern battlefield.

Bring back analog systems



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:27 AM
link   
What a brillant thread!!! S&F for you sir!!

The detail and thought you have put into this is amazing. Highly commendable and thank you for your effort and your factual results. Whatever caused it , I certainly wont be disagreeing as to the original location!!!

Keep up the good work.

It was a very enjoyable read....thank you



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


I understand your point of view EM, however if even one person finds enlightenment in the data presented by the OP then the thread has served its purpose. We are here trying to deny ignorance and to that end the ressurection of zombie subjects is required to see things in light of new data or to appreciate a new point of view.

I would hazard to say that if ATS didn't beat dead horses there would not be much to read!


[edit on 1-2-2010 by Helmkat]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by PhotonEffect
 


Actually, the information that you asked me to provide (about my engineering buddies providing information against this) has been provided in previous sky spiral threads. It's been done. That's my point. Its been done over and over, and then...I am asked to re-provide that same information in yet...a new sky spiral thread. Although I will say this, I wasn't the one that provided that information on any of the threads. Other people beat me to it.

And, I will agree...the statement that I made regarding donkeys impregnating chimpanzees on independence day has no value to gaining further ground on this thread. However, there was a point to the "analogy." (if you would call it that) and since you seem quite intelligent, I think you know exactly what that point was. And, I definitely would not call my father's efforts at engineering with NWSC anything to scoff at, nor my friend's endeavors with game theory, electrical, and industrial engineering weak by any stretch of the imagination. I have not insulted you, therefore, it shows a weak character to try to insult me or others who have spent years upon years working and developing things that have kept you and your family safe.

Now, as far as hanging around in this thread...I merely made my statement and left. I am now fielding responses to the questions that I have received as a result. I am not here to insult you or anyone else, but, I will say that the fact that this issue keeps arising is an insult to us all.

[edit on 1-2-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Helmkat
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


I understand your point of view EM, however if even one person finds enlightenment in the data presented by the OP then the thread has served its purpose. We are here trying to deny ignorance and to that end the ressurection of zombie subjects is required to see things in light of new data or to appreciate a new point of view.

I would hazard to say that if ATS didn't beat dead horses there would not be much to read!


[edit on 1-2-2010 by Helmkat]


I will give you credit on that statement Helmkat. Cheers to your observation.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:39 AM
link   
I think That Norway spiral did not come from Russia .I think it may have came from the sky down and coming from a non invasive material that defects detection however this is just specualtion unless i saw the event..

1. The object was located
2. It was rotational
3. Perfect locational
4. Down up or up from top

I would call this an ufL

[edit on 1-2-2010 by AndersonLee]

[edit on 1-2-2010 by AndersonLee]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:39 AM
link   
reply to post by tauristercus
 



Incredible research and detail.

Starred and flagged is not even enough for this thread.





posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   
I still to this day believe this was no missile test. IT WAS A MISSILE LAUNCHED. At something, Something that has advanced tech that realizes to dodge a rocket bound by modern day physics is to literally out spiral the rocket until the rocket looses its velocity.

Eyewitness accounts show UFO's preforming high velocity turns and stops and exhibiting other zero G like actions.

I pose this question to you all. How would a Zero G craft evade a modern day missile.


You all are focused on the wrong thing, missile tests, failed missile tests. i say BS.... i say, ?????WHAT WHERE THEY LAUNCHING AT????

Free you're minds and open them up to the other possibilities of this situation.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


i don't mind repeats cause i don't read them all.
in fact, i didn't read the first one that spawned this one. so this was all very fun to read.


Understood. You should check out some of the other threads that existed before this one.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 10:56 AM
link   
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


Well, quite honestly I haven't seen any of this info you speak of and I've been following and participating in almost all of these threads... not sure if that's a good thing or not, but anyhow...

Perhaps you could've provided links in that post of yours pointing people to your information. No one is expecting you to provide this info, but if you'd prefer to avoid outbursts like mine, and continue to support the quality of this forum, then please do post links for people.

I would certainly be interested in reading what your engineering friends' perspectives are on it all. The OP's analysis is not the first of it's kind that I've seen but it was well laid out and is hard to refute given the math he's used.

It also serves to confirm what has been determined by other sources, that this was most likely a missile launch originating from the White Sea. Call it a nail in the coffin so to speak...(maybe not the final nail, but certainly one that's not coming undone)

As you can see by all the stars and flags this thread has earned it's still a very interesting subject to many members and like I pointed out before it seems to be serving it's purpose. Quite a few members who have had their tent firmly pitched in the" it can't be a missile" camp will read this and surely move their tents to the other side, where it most likely belongs from my stand point...

The point is, this thread in all its intents and purposes was created in the name of truth by someone who took the time to research and analyze, and also I might add was at one point not a believer in the missile theory...

You have to respect that

[edit on 1-2-2010 by PhotonEffect]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by BetweenTheLine
 


All of that without evidence. Please keep baseless conjecture out of this thread. You might as well say it was a jam sandwich coming out of hyperspeed too close to the Earth's magnetic field or some other nonsense.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 11:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by BetweenTheLine
I still to this day believe this was no missile test. IT WAS A MISSILE LAUNCHED. At something, Something that has advanced tech that realizes to dodge a rocket bound by modern day physics is to literally out spiral the rocket until the rocket looses its velocity.

Eyewitness accounts show UFO's preforming high velocity turns and stops and exhibiting other zero G like actions.

I pose this question to you all. How would a Zero G craft evade a modern day missile.


You all are focused on the wrong thing, missile tests, failed missile tests. i say BS.... i say, ?????WHAT WHERE THEY LAUNCHING AT????

Free you're minds and open them up to the other possibilities of this situation.


Interesting... I never looked at this event from this possibility...



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 11:27 AM
link   
reply to post by davesidious
 


You wouldn't have much posting being done on ATS if they would all convey some kind of proof... Lighten up mate... This site should help open minds, as much as 'prove' anything, imho.



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 12:02 PM
link   
I still don't believe this was a missile.

But i have to say: this was one of the best topics that i've ever read. I wouldn't be able to do even 1/15 of all the work that you have done to create this.

Really, Star & Flag aren't enough.


Congratz!



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 12:08 PM
link   
This was not a missile......remove the missile idea and the brain is more alert

It was something....But not sure ...



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 12:14 PM
link   
this is an excellently researched thread as far as trajectory (coming or going) goes, but it goes without saying that we still have absolutely no clue what we are looking at. and trust me, i don't want to believe it's one thing (crazy theory) or another (rational theory) but i do know that everyone still feels this in the back of their head when we all look at these pictures that we are not being told whole truth and we then must ask ourselves why conceal facts or details to a global media blitz.

an identical event occured in the 80's in china, and despite china's proximity to russia, we still have as much understanding as to what it is as we do after the norway phenomenon. i bring that up because, can anyone show us proof of russia testing/launching VERY similar rockets/missles almost 30 years ago?

again i have to commend your excellent research, posts like yours are why i love this website, but the morphology of this event and others still smacks of a big blue unnknown spiral to me.

[also i read the entire thread and just want to clear up some posts:
-conspiracy means to use legal loopholes OR illegal means to illegally make money
-we shouldn't confuse the word conspiracy with flat out lying or withholding evidence. meaning we don't need to think of this event as a conspiracy just yet, but either a cover up, or just a missle test/launch
-moot means the opposite of what everyone thinks. it means something IS arguable
-really glad helmkat brought up the beating dead horses point, i was going to say the same thing. imagine if we had stopped studying 9/11 on 9/12, or march '03. seriously.. this is ATS. ]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
reply to post by PhotonEffect
 


And, I definitely would not call my father's efforts at engineering with NWSC anything to scoff at, nor my friend's endeavors with game theory, electrical, and industrial engineering weak by any stretch of the imagination.


I must've missed this initially or maybe you edited in after I read it... but I wouldn't scoff at anything your father's done either, or your friend. Actually I'm very interested in game theory... reading "the predictioneer's game" now.. that for another topic...



I have not insulted you, therefore, it shows a weak character to try to insult me or others who have spent years upon years working and developing things that have kept you and your family safe.


No you have not insulted me, but you are now by considering my character weak. It was not my intent to insult you. I merely responded in a manner based on what you provided in your posts. That's it. If you don't like it, then I'd suggest you might reconsider how you go about posting.

And please don't lay out this stuff about how you do things to keep me safe and how I should watch my manner with you. I mean really, how in the world am I supposed to know what you do in the first place...

It's not hard to realize that the only way to judge people on here is by the quality (or lack there-of) of their posts. That's unfortunate but 'tis the way 'tis...




[edit on 1-2-2010 by PhotonEffect]



posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 12:44 PM
link   
reply to post by PhotonEffect
 

Here's a few...
docs.google.com...

Another take on the same thing...
www.examiner.com... ss-destruction

www.youtube.com...

Now, I haven't found the primary link that I'm looking for yet. It may take some time. Also, I don't know that I am necessarily in agreement of anything else other than the first link. However, there is some very thorough info provided on the first and should be considered equally as viable as anything that has been posted. The mathematics are sound and point in an alternate direction than a failed missile.

These links are not from my friend. As I said before, I am currently looking for the primary link.

I will provide more soon. Right now I'm sitting in a political science class at I.U. I'm not only taking notes but researching this. So, it will be a little while. Thanks.



[edit on 1-2-2010 by EvolvedMinistry]






top topics



 
316
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join