Originally posted by Matrix Rising
When the skeptic asks for evidence it's a joke.
That first line pretty well sums up your attitude.
Look around, MR. What do you see?
Perhaps a computer monitor, your mobile phone? A TV? Some walls, the ceiling, other furniture? A window, through which you can see the sky, trees,
other houses, people, animals, cars, an aircraft flying overhead?
Tangible. Provable. Verifiable. Duplicatable. The science behind them is all there, easily researched. Every single one of those things are in
all four categories. Tell us how many things you see that aren't tangible, provable, verifiable or duplicatable?
Are you spotting the tiny-weeny difference between reality and an alien spacecraft claim?
Now, it's
possible that fairies built your computer. But there are better explanations, yes? Indeed, by doing a bit of healthy research, you
can almost eliminate the fairy possibility...
When you point at a video of lights in the sky, its
possible that it's an alien spacecraft.
Or fairies! Do you deny that fairies could be responsible?
On what basis???
I know, as someone who is adept at photo- and video-graphy, what happens when you try to capture lights at night. Many others do too. So when we
look at most of the evidence, we chuckle, point out the flaming obvious, and move on. Or try to. In the hope that somewhere, sometime, maybe we will
finally be visited by the almost inevitable alien life.
But in the meantime, I'm absolutely sick to death of seeing the same old garbage posted by naive amateurs who wouldn't know a camera lens from
their... Then there's the new wave of CGI, now that such software is relatively affordable..
You, it appears, would prefer we just accepted it. Yep, that one's an alien. That one too, and yeah, that one over there. Whoopee. Don't worry
that it looks exactly like lens bokeh, or digital zoom, or an aircraft on approach.
It's an alien. They always look like that...
And where exactly does that put you, when the author admits they don't have a clue what they shot, or that it was a hoax, or if someone then shows a
close duplicate of the image/s, but is able to easily demonstrate earthly origins?
Why is it that almost every one of these videos and images is not duplicated by anyone else, and is not shot in a crowded situation with lots of
witnesses. You know, credible ones?
Anyway, why not make this useful. MR, post your VERY BEST incontrovertible evidence of alien visitation. And then I'll happily explain why I think
it does not fall into the Tangible - Provable - Verifiable -Duplicatable categories. Probably ALL of them...
And if you can debate otherwise, you win!
Now, I'm betting you won't like that competition, so why not be precise and set your own rules and see who will play?
Tell us, in detail, what standards of proof you use. Not just for this, but for anything. I have a bridge to sell you - I can show you a video to
prove it is real...