posted on Feb, 1 2010 @ 05:09 PM
A person can do SOME good things, while doing MOSTLY evil things, behind the scenes, or things that, while not DIRECTLY supporting evil, support an
As someone else in another post said earlier, look to what is already known about a person, if he is ruthless in business, doesn't that make him even
more likely to be ruthless in other areas, as well?
It's even better if you can make yourself look good in the process of doing evil.
So maybe all the cheerleaders for Bill G. should take a look at
THIS TIMELY ARTICLE.
You be the judge.........
According to Secretary Clinton, President Obama's Global Health Initiative will be "the centerpiece" of his foreign policy, and even though
America is drowning in debt and the U.S. economy is floundering, he has committed $63 billion to his global ObamaCare initiative.
What the Clinton and Obama statements do not mention is that the Obama Global Health Initiative is not an Obama initiative at all, but merely
his continuation and expansion of the UN's global population control program, which is a priority concern for some of the world's wealthiest elites
who want to see the planet's human population drastically reduced. The real initiators of Obama's GHI are Bill Gates, George Soros, Ted Turner,
Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller, the World Economic Forum, the Clinton Global Initiative, the United Nations Foundation, and the International
Planned Parenthood Federation.
The Secret "Good Club" On May 24 of last year, the Times of London reported in an online article that a secret meeting of the world's leading
billionaires had struck on a plan for curtailing world population. Entitled "Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation," it told of a gathering
in Manhattan that included Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Oprah Winfrey, and others. (The New American reported on it here.)
The Times reports that, according to an attendee, "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled
as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat." "This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed
it needs big-brain answers," said the guest. "They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all
see looming." Bill Gates, it seems, exerted a major influence on their decision. "Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was
a priority," reported the Times.
**** they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial
**** "This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,"
When people with *big brains*, and lots of money, who think they are better than the average person, think the way the above statements indicate they
do, then yes, you have to question their charity, and ask yourselves, what's in it for them.
It's pretty obvious.
[edit on 1-2-2010 by sezsue]