Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
It is pure speculation on his part. As it says above: ...the scientific evidence is inadequate at the present time to say anything about the
probability. I would go so far as to say it is non-existent. His claimed evidence is so weak as to be stillborn. That all life on Earth shares
the same basic DNA structure doesn't tell us anything other all life on Earth shares the same DNA structure.
It was pretty clear that he's speculating.
And scientific theory is just that; it's theory and speculation until a new theory comes along that disproves the old model.
Scientific theory speculates , Rex. That's what it does.
And if we already knew about other life then we wouldn't have people speculating.
Flight at one point was only a theory. But people were allowed to speculate on the theories involved because that's part of the process of new
discoveries. Why hate the speculator? And why post about scientific theory when you don't know what it is?
"It's not a theory, it does not meet the criteria of a theory. There is no evidence to support it (or refute it), nor is there a way to test or
falsify it. It is an idea and little more. "
That's from your second post. And here's my response.
"scientific theory: An explanation of why and how a specific natural phenomenon occurs. A lot of hypotheses are based on theories. In turn, theories
may be redefined as new hypotheses are tested. Examples of theories: Newton’s Theory of Gravitation, Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, Mendel’s
theory of Inheritance, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity"
www.ncsu.edu...