It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
As a logical person I can't get past these facts... help me out! Why doesn't EVERYONE know these are true?
1) The hole in the Pentagon is smaller than an airplane and left basically no airplane debris.
2) Larry Silverstein video, NYFD video, and precognition video by BBC all point that Bldg 7 was destroyed by explosives.
3) No black boxes.
4) Melting temperature of steel building frame is around 3000 degrees but airplane fuel and building materials only reach around 1100 degrees.
I watched 9/11 happen. It was a dreadful, shocking, emotional day and week. Psychologically I can understand people not wanting to look into it, and I appreciate and accept their space. What I don't understand is the people who vehemently get involved but don't seem to care about the facts!
1) The hole in the Pentagon is smaller than an airplane and left basically no airplane debris.
2) Larry Silverstein video, NYFD video, and precognition video by BBC all point that Bldg 7 was destroyed by explosives.
3) No black boxes.
4) Melting temperature of steel building frame is around 3000 degrees but airplane fuel and building materials only reach around 1100 degrees.
****
I watched 9/11 happen. It was a dreadful, shocking, emotional day and week. Psychologically I can understand people not wanting to look into it, and I appreciate and accept their space. What I don't understand is the people who vehemently get involved but don't seem to care about the facts!
If you got home and there was a 3 foot hole in your house, logically, under ANY circumstances your conclusion should NOT be that it was a car that made the hole. Why do people do this with the Pentagon hole??
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
convenient blanket statements to fight facts just ain't gonna cut it in this thread ol' dave...
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
This is allegedly a hole caused because a 757 crashed into the Pentagon and went through all the levels intact enough to create this round hole... with no fire on it.
stayed intact through 3 wings of a building
those few simple facts above it just doesn't add up.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Dave you're pullin' my leg! you've never heard the term 'pull' used in demolition? old movies? I'm not trying to pull the wool over your eyes or pull a fast one, 'pull' is a pretty common term for demolition!
Etymology of Pull (pŏŏl):
10.To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building.
Dictionary.com
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Sorry, but bait and switch doesn't work on me. "Pull down an old office building" means exactly that -pull it down AS IN WITH CABLES. This is exactly how they demolished the remains of WTC 6- with cables. It's not lingo for anything. It's the description of the actual act, and it most certainly does NOT refer to "blowing it up". That's coming entirely from these damned fool conspircy web sites, so unless you're attempting to claim that WTC 7 was secretly pulled down with cables, you're on the losing end of this debate, here.
BTW just what old movie ever said "pull it" meant to blow something up with explosives? Let me know and I'll Netflix it.
Originally posted by Sean48
So your saying , when he said "Pull It" he was referring to the firemen?
Weren't they out of the building hours before ?
Not nice of ole Lar to refer to firemen as "It" either.
The OS is the conspiracy now.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
How 'bout, "Keep your eye on that building, that thing's coming down."
or "We're walking back, there's a building about to blow up."
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
There is a video interview I've seen with the NYFD fire chief stating, on camera, that Building 7 would either come down on it's own, or they'd bring it down if needed.
Fact: Building 7 collapsed from almost entirely intact, to a pile of rubble in 6.4 seconds.