posted on Jan, 28 2010 @ 07:31 AM
1. Airplane full of innocents flown into WTC2.
True
2. Airplane full of innocents flown into WTC1.
True
3. Airplane full of innocents flown into Pentagon.
True
4. Airplane full of innocents smashed into PA ground.
True
5. Flight 93 shot down?
No but it was going to be. Passenger revolt or no passenger revolt, that plane was NOT going to DC.
6. WTC 2 destroyed by plane?
Yes
7. WTC 1 destroyed by plane?
Yes
8. WTC 7 brought down by WTC 2 & 1 debris?
Prove it.
So I can believe everything up to WTC 7. And my doubts about WTC 7 force everything else into question.
I used to be a banker. One of my customers was a Secret Service agent. No big deal. They have to bank somewhere. One of them banked with me.
He had a loan with us and when you get a loan, we need to know were you work.
From time to time, we would show him questionable money.
Anyway, I joked with him about being a spook and an MIB. All in good fun. No big deal.
But one day I asked him what he thought about 911. I was causal about it. He peaks around (we did allot of mellow-drama) then leans in and says
quietly, "Follow the money trail backwards and you'll get your truth every time. About anything"
Another customer was a retired guy who was a war veteran, police officer, and corrections officer (prison guard). I used to joke around with him to.
One day he says to me, "DO you know the difference between being a little bit right and being extremely right? If your a little bit right, nobody
comes to kill you! HAHAHAHAHA!"
So follow the money trail backwards and as you do, pay attention to the associated people who died.
JFK-Lee Harvey Oswald is the pansy.
911-Osama Bin Laden is the pansy.
For practice, we should look at JFK and Pearl Harbor to.
Same thing with WWI and WWII. What led to the start of those wars? Follow the money trial backwards and pay attention to the associated people who
turned up dead at the time.
So, to be clear, I want to believe 911 wasn't an act of treason.
But................