I stumbled across this article, and to me, really hit home on some good points.
A World of DisInfo: Project Camelot
Do you think High is correct in saying PC is a disinfo outlet?
That is a double sided coin... if you believe something, and read something that goes against your beliefs, it's very easy to see this as disinfo.
I don't know if they are a disinfo outlet, I am of the opinion that you hit the nail on the head. PC comes off as people that really enjoy the lime light (whether it's cause they miss it and our outta work Hollywooders.) They know there is an audience out there that wants/has to hear what they are saying, so they really run with it.
As for High, I think he really believe his BS. The problem is all that "data" he gets from his webbot is subject to his own interpretation.
I enjoyed some of the article about Time Travel that you posted from HPH. But what makes it any more correct than PC? Like you said, he blasts PC for not backing it up with concrete information.... yet he has not one shred of evidence to back up his claims/beliefs. A little bit of Ad Hominem for ya.
The most interesting thing to me, is a little sentence that is taken from the Wiki page of Project Camelot.
“Camelot does not provide proof…they rather share information for the individual to discern, the preservation of free will is of utmost importance and to provide indisputable evidence would undermine the project.”
“to provide indisputable evidence would undermine the project.”
I don't know about you.... but that pretty much sums it up for me.
Who DOESN'T want indisputable evidence??
[edit on 11-2-2010 by Allegory of Illumination]