Cliff High Vs. Project Camelot., page

www.halfpasthuman.com...

High has been a tirades about PC for awhile now (for those new, High is the inventor of the "Webbot"). I think he's a bit hypocritical because he can't prove his claims either. But, here's the subject for discussion: Do you think High is correct in saying PC is a disinfo outlet? Do you believe High might be a source of disinfo as well? Or are they all just deluded and full of it?

I personally don't see PC as anymore than some out of work hollywood types bumbling around. It's entertainment in the vein of a cartoon to me. They might be used by people who are attempting to purposely mislead others but, does unknowingly giving one the platform equate to committing their crime? As for High, I think he really believe his BS. The problem is all that "data" he gets from his webbot is subject to his own interpretation. That data is going to be skewed in the direction his worldview takes it. The data itself might be useful if it was reviewed by more than three people in my mind. I think that might bring some objectivity to the project.

I too have asked myself very similar questions. A while back I came across the PC website and checked it out thoroughly. Some of the things I was hearing peaked my curiosity and attention.... many of the other things I was very skeptical of. This lead me to look around and try and figure out what their main Modus Operandi really is.

I stumbled across this article, and to me, really hit home on some good points.

A World of DisInfo: Project Camelot

Do you think High is correct in saying PC is a disinfo outlet?

That is a double sided coin... if you believe something, and read something that goes against your beliefs, it's very easy to see this as disinfo.

I don't know if they are a disinfo outlet, I am of the opinion that you hit the nail on the head. PC comes off as people that really enjoy the lime light (whether it's cause they miss it and our outta work Hollywooders.) They know there is an audience out there that wants/has to hear what they are saying, so they really run with it.

As for High, I think he really believe his BS. The problem is all that "data" he gets from his webbot is subject to his own interpretation.

I enjoyed some of the article about Time Travel that you posted from HPH. But what makes it any more correct than PC? Like you said, he blasts PC for not backing it up with concrete information.... yet he has not one shred of evidence to back up his claims/beliefs. A little bit of Ad Hominem for ya.

The most interesting thing to me, is a little sentence that is taken from the Wiki page of Project Camelot.

“Camelot does not provide proof…they rather share information for the individual to discern, the preservation of free will is of utmost importance and to provide indisputable evidence would undermine the project.”

I REPEAT......
“to provide indisputable evidence would undermine the project.”

I don't know about you.... but that pretty much sums it up for me.
Who DOESN'T want indisputable evidence??



[edit on 11-2-2010 by Allegory of Illumination]

Thanks for making the thread antonia.


Folks, here is my favourite part - it is from near the end:

My bitch with the presenters, Project Camelot, is that they hypocritically state that their mission is to present the information that they are given by the whistleblowers and allow the viewer to make their own discernment as to its validity and reality. What Project Camelot is doing is expressed in many of the written parts of their site where they include references to ‘belief’. They repeatedly state that they (project camelot) believe that their source or whistleblower ‘believes’ their ‘testimony’, and therefore Project Camelot supports the position taken by that ‘whistleblower’.

I find their actions and proffered stance to be disingenuous. They are hypocritical at best, in that they are spending a lot of time and energy in defense of some of their ‘whistleblowers’ and the fantasies presented by them as ‘information’. That the defense of the whistleblower is being driven by personality is disturbing. Further this position has been promoting much disinformation. After all, with so many conflicts amongst their whistleblowers, not all of them can be correct.

Without taking their (Project Camelot) motives into account, and by that, I mean let us assume that they are not willing tools for disinformation, then they are at best unaware hypocrites to their own mission. Note that they NEVER defend the information itself, and rather are ALWAYS defending their sources based on personality, and not factual presentation (truth). Further, the apparent (by their actions) only criteria for them to consider someone a ‘whistleblower’ is that the person ‘believe’ their own story. All that is necessary for Project Camelot to consider someone a whistleblower and a 'true guy' is that the person present themselves such that Project Camelot 'feels' that the person believes what they are saying. Nope, no discrimination exercised. No cross checking, validation, nor even cursory background checks required at Project Camelot.

www.halfpasthuman.com...

Looks like PC is on the way out, due to a split with Kerry and Bill. lucianarchy.proboards.com...

" Because Camelot has been infiltrated. Read my 27 Feb Camelot update. Take a look. All the info is there.
You think I'd delete my own video when it had received 25,000 views in 36 hours and was all set to go viral?
Look at the 27 Feb update. Read carefully. The infiltrator is John (Jack) Burns. He works for Australian intelligence. He's got in very close with Kerry and David WIlcock.
He wanted to sack all the volunteers, move Camelot to a central office in Australia, make Kerry a star, have only paid staff, and have him as the co-coordinator. Kerry wanted to do it. I said no way, not ever.
You have no idea what's going on behind the scenes. Camelot is being taken down.
27 Feb update on Camelot. On the blog. Read it carefully.
The problems are huge.
Of course... it's a classic intel ploy, straight out of the book.
It's SO obvious.
Re Camelot being taken down, I'm going to quit fairly soon and will re-establish Avalon as Camelot 2.
I have drafted major statement called BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON PROJECT CAMELOT. I think we're at the stage now where PR and careful political statements won't heal anything - the only thing that works is the truth."

It all sounds too weird for me!

Yep, its official. They are dissolving the website into three:

Camelot library - Archives
Bill's site
Kerry's Site

Looks like they are parting way's.

Projectcamelot.org

Some major stuff has been going down over the last few months.

I've written an article about Benjamin Fulford, one of the loony sounding people they have an interview of at PC. psychic-dream.com...

Kerry finally tells it as it is!


In her blog post today Kerry tells her side of the camelot split up story

Under the title 'On Protecting Sources and Confidentiality' Her statement has been written in response to the recent actions of Bill Ryan which led to the split up of Camelot and why the building of the portal became necessary.

"I have been silent until now ... However, I can no longer remain silent due to the statement made by Bill Ryan on his site regarding what he considers to be a "takedown" of Camelot.

... when Bill Ryan came forward to debunk and out two whistleblowers. He did this, in spite of the fact that both these whistleblowers came to Camelot in trust and in secrecy, placing themselves at the mercy of Camelot with the complete belief that Project Camelot was an organization of integrity and would fully honor any secrecy in their dealings with those individuals as clearly stated in the mission statement on our website.

Unfortunately, Bill Ryan recently decided that the statement of confidentiality and secrecy was to be amended to say in essence "if I, Bill Ryan, decide subsequently, that the story told to us in confidence is false or misleading I will then take it upon myself to out the witness and thereby reveal our "source" to the world, putting their lives and the lives of their loved ones in danger, as well as violating the clear implied and expressed agreement that we have established in writing previously with them and to the world...."

read it all here

[edit on 15-4-2010 by cosmicwink]

[edit on 16-4-2010 by cosmicwink]

reply to post by Allegory of Illumination

---

Disinformation is like cancer it can get in everywhere and anywhere. Look at Robert Dean, he seemed pretty straight to me and then I find that a photograph of a UFO on the moon during the Apollo landings he's been showing in his presentations is a total fake. It looks legit until you see it with the gain backed right off and then it's obviously just a cut and paste job of one of the stages of their rocket. Fits in nicely with Aldrin's UFO story on the way up there and places doubt on that story as well.
Now did Bob Dean know, or did the fake slip past him as well?
I don't know if I can take his work seriously until I see him addressing the problem but so far I can't find any comments by him about it.
It's that easy to discredit someone who's getting close to some very sensitive info.

the whole \'deny ignorance\' thing
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags

Mike Bara says Apollo "camera negatives" were airbrushed
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags

Creepy Illuminati Clock Counting Down Sept 9th, 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags

Low flying unmarked 4 prop plane spotted 3 times in a week. Any ideas?
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags

Is large ammunition becoming hard to come by?
  Posted 6 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: