The one benefit that stands out to me is possible human resurrection. They've done it with dogs, I'm sure they've tried it with humans. It
might seem sick to you, but just imagine if we could resurrect people who have been murdered, even if for only a few minutes. As long as their brain
isn't too badly decayed or damaged they could tell you who murdered them, and possibly say goodbye to their families, maybe even live on indefinitely
if the tech was advanced enough. Darth Vader suit anyone?
Good God man, you have got to be #ting me. Where would that lead, immortal people, then we are seriously screwed, its hard enough to limit
population.
To solve murders? C'mon man, think. How horrendous to revive somebody brutally and horrifically murdered for the sake of being a witness. Assuming
they retain memory, which would be your whole point, that would constitute emotional/mental abuse and cruelty of the highest order.
Live on if the teck was good enough? No thanks pal. Folk living by tecknology are only on borrowed time anyway, no quality of life, and what of the
cost to the health system?
If you reanimate me, my first action would be to sue your arse for suffering you caused me.
Horrendous ideas.
Likewise that research was incredible cruel. Science is cold and uncompassionate.
The world is not messed up Q-ball, Humans are. And where the world is messed up, humans did it!
[edit on 14-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]