People who post a prediction which fails should have a permanent mark on their avatar., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 09:53 AM by Sorcha Faal
reply to post by Chonx



I am with you 100% there should be a wager box where one must put all his points up before any prediction is made, and then when the prediction fails, they are zeroed out as a punishment. Not that points mean a whole lot, but it is the next best thing to a public hanging.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 09:56 AM by Chonx
reply to post by Archirvion



I'm not talking about any 2012 predictions because that date has not come to pass and those predictions have not failed.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:00 AM by Chonx
reply to post by Rising Against



That's true and would apply if predictions didn't pop up in other forums too. I'm not against the notion of a prediction or the predictions board, but why should someone be free to make up a new story and misslead people again if they have already failed at an honest, accurate prediction?


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:00 AM by XXXN3O
reply to post by Chonx



I disagree, I think it is overkill to do what you are suggesting.

Its the equivalent of me saying I think the internet should be shut down if nothing happens on 2012. Given the proportion of the predictions around the time if you get me.

Allowing people to make predictions whether fact based or not is essential. It is the only way that anyone will realise they are wrong, if they are wrong. It also allows people to disclose information they might have that they cannot actually post for fear of the consequences.

You can ignore the predictions if you do not like them.

I am just trying to look at both angles here and I get where you are coming from but you have to strike a balance somewhere.




reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:08 AM by Rising Against
reply to post by Chonx



Oh no I agree with you there trust me and that's wrong and those threads should be moved to the right forum. But I think it’s unfair to make a permanent mark on their profile maybe if someone does it maybe 3 times then they get a point’s deduction or a warning.

If they continue to blatantly do it after that then obvious it becomes more a more serious issue and maybe a banning.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:18 AM by Chonx
reply to post by solarstorm



I made this thread. BAM! members and owners can now be aware and the facilitation and implimentation can begin providing it has support from both.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:18 AM by havok
reply to post by Chonx



I agree with you, but I don't think there should be a marked account.
I think after a few attention grabbing false claims, they should be banned.
There are TONS of users that are just making crap threads.
Call them Dis-info agents, noobs, whatever, they are useless.

I am all for taking out the garbage.

On the other hand, there should be a section for complaints that can be deemed, "fixable". Because I know alot of ATS'ers that feel the same way.

I digress, ATS is an open forum, subject to T&C, and there's plenty of room for garbage to be let throught the cracks




reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:26 AM by solarstorm
Originally posted by Chonx
reply to
post by solarstorm



I made this thread. BAM! members and owners can now be aware and the facilitation and implimentation can begin providing it has support from both.


NO NO...you made a SUGGESTION without making "YOURSELF" AS PART OF THE SOLUTION. If approved YOU should be the one being part of the solution. Right? YOU should be the one who MONITORS the failed predictions and given that power, since you are sooo passionate about it. Right? This task, if approved should be assigned to YOU.

[edit on 25-1-2010 by solarstorm]



reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:31 AM by Chonx
reply to post by solarstorm



Yea ok. Fair enough. I'm not a moderator though so I'm not sure how that would be possible. If the ATS PTB however, did decide to offer me that task. I would be happy do it.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:38 AM by shagreen heart
Originally posted by Chonx
reply to
post by solarstorm



Yea ok. Fair enough. I'm not a moderator though so I'm not sure how that would be possible. If the ATS PTB however, did decide to offer me that task. I would be happy do it.


but the catch is your avatar has the quoted text from my previous post.

you should check out my thread where i predict chonx fails as a 'tired of being scared prediction puppystomper police' when he comes to terms with why those threads have positive aspect despite being negative things and somehow in the way of people who properly use the search function.

[edit on 25-1-2010 by shagreen heart]


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:46 AM by Chonx
reply to post by shagreen heart



I'm not certain you understand what I'm saying but.... If you do and you disagree, then that's fine and I have no problem with that.

Obviously this is how I feel ATS could move forward regarding those types of threads and the members who make them. If I'm in the minority in thinking this then that's fine too, I wouldn't want this to happen just because I want it to, but only if it had the support of the majority of members, staff and owners.

cheers.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 10:54 AM by shagreen heart
Originally posted by Chonx
reply to
post by shagreen heart



I'm not certain you understand what I'm saying but.... If you do and you disagree, then that's fine and I have no problem with that.

Obviously this is how I feel ATS could move forward regarding those types of threads and the members who make them. If I'm in the minority in thinking this then that's fine too, I wouldn't want this to happen just because I want it to, but only if it had the support of the majority of members, staff and owners.

cheers.


yeah i grip it, it's not a difficult concept.
and i don't agree, your idea is ludicrous.

someone who takes the time to make a thread like that (wether you feel this way or not) gambles their entire name on protecting everyone else by predicting a logical conclusion to a chain of recent events, and you want to add insult to injury by juicing a lemon allover their sacrificed name and brandthem forever as 'some fail prophet that wasted space on my ats'.

no, i don't support that.


reply posted on 25-1-2010 @ 11:00 AM by Chonx
reply to post by shagreen heart



Well, you obviously don't understand. This would mearly make members aware if a thread they are looking at has been made by someone with a proven history of failing at making predictions therefore making said member less likely to grant it attention therefore cutting down on the clutter on the forum.

You're being just a little bit over dramatic and I don't think for a second that most of these threads are born from wanting protect anyone else but from want for attention.





[edit on 25-1-2010 by Chonx]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Message Dream Last Night: "Torque in the Human Body"
  Posted 9 days ago with 7 member flags
Doomsday Dream - Given an 18 Hour Notice
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Second coming... Just a dream or something more?
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags
I spoke to a dead celebrity in a dream last night.
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
New Dream
  Posted 10 days ago with 3 member flags
I saw the Sun ache
  Posted 10 days ago with 3 member flags
My trip to a FEMA camp
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 10 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 6 hours ago, 49 replies