It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Do you want government regulating what movies can be shown to the public? Do you want the government determining what movies can be advertised? Or what books can be sold? Well, the Obama administration actually argued for these regulations before the Supreme Court in defending campaign finance regulations. Actually, they went even further and said that such regulations were essential to limiting how much money is spent on political campaigns.
Fortunately, the Supreme Court disagreed. On Thursday, in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court struck down a law that had been used to stop the advertising or showing of "Hillary: The Movie" during the 2008 presidential campaign. No one doubts that the movie was critical of Hillary Clinton and that its release was timed precisely to hurt her presidential campaign. What the court couldn't abide was letting the government decide when a movie crossed the line and became too political. The ruling eliminates bans that corporations and unions have faced in trying to influence elections 30 days before a primary election or nominating convention, or within 60 days before a general election.
Originally posted by AllexxisF1
This is the most retarded thing I have ever read.
Are you bloody serious.
Health insurance corporations care about making money and could give a rats ass about people.
Military industrial complex wants war and lots of it.
Energy companies want zero innovation and no green clean technologies.
All corporations want low wage immigrant workers paid in scraps with no benefits whatsoever.
...and you think that this decision will somehow empower corporations to take over the Government and make this country a better place by giving themselves free reign to do what ever they want?...and you are ok with that.
Are you bloody serious!
Jesus Man, wake the hell up. When have the corporations done anything for the common good. By their very nature ..they don't care about human NATURE! only profits.
Good God where do you people come from!
[edit on 22-1-2010 by AllexxisF1]
Originally posted by civilchallenger
You don't believe in the freedom of speech? Under the freedom of speech, if you can say something as an individual you can also say it as a collective.
The solution is not to restrict the speech of corporations, union, individuals, or renegade film makers.
an association of individuals, created by law or under authority of law, having a continuous existence independent of the existences of its members, and powers and liabilities distinct from those of its members.
The solution is to reduce the power of government.
DO NOT BE MAD AT FREE SPEECH! Be mad at the system behind your anger.
Originally posted by civilchallenger
You don't believe in the freedom of speech? Under the freedom of speech, if you can say something as an individual you can also say it as a collective.
The solution is to reduce the power of government.
Do groups have such a right? The problem with corporate speech is that it becomes anonymous without individual responsibility.
Funny how you don't see folks complaining about how UNIONS can already give and do whatever they please when it comes to advertsing etc.