Thanks for the link
There have been so many books about this subject, filled with accounts provided by ordinary folk who have nothing to gain from recounting their
experience, yet science continues to offer 'explanations' which, as the author says in the article you linked, 'make less sense than the phenomenon
they're attempting to dispute' ... or words to that effect
Most of know someone first or second-hand who's had a near-death experience. When they tell you what happened to them, they're sincere and usually,
amazed
For example, years ago, I spoke with a woman who'd just given birth. In ordinary circumstances, I'm sure the first and only thing on her mind would
be her new baby. But instead, this woman fixed me with her eyes and repeated, 'I died. I saw myself from above'
She went on to tell me that she'd suddenly found herself 'above' the doctors and nurses and was looking down at her body as she struggled with the
birth
She also said that she'd loved being 'free' of herself and the pain and that it felt 'lovely' being away from all of it. Then, she said, she'd
felt guilty at the thought of leaving her husband and baby alone. Next she knew, she was back in her body
The experience ranked as more important, for a few days, than her first child, from which she felt (and behaved) detached. Then Nature stepped in and
within a week, she was like any other young mother and devoted to her baby
It's just another account and I realise it won't have any particular interest or believability for most. But I was there, saw the expressions on
her face, heard her voice. I have no doubt she was telling the truth as she knew it
Back then, there wasn't a great deal of discussion of Out of Body Experiences. It was long before internet and even before Scott Rogo's books which
for many, introduced them to the OOBE phenomenon. The woman was genuinely astonished by what had happened to her. I was able to tell her that she
wasn't going crazy, that it had happened to many before her
I don't blame 'science' for attempting to discount such accounts as they fly in face of what most in the scientific community were taught (and want
to believe ). Also, most in the scientific community seek to 'protect' us from what they consider to be hoaxes and misunderstood/misinterpreted
experiences which, they claim, have a perfectly logical explanation.
They need to believe 'everything has a logical explanation'. It
frightens them when something 'won't fit' their theories
Nevertheless, people continue to have these experiences and afterwards, they don't really care what science has to say about it, because they know
what happened to them and ... being more flexible and open minded than most maths-based 'scientists' ... they have no vested interest in making
their experience fit a scientific box