It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sean48
But until idiots like Beck or O'reilly tell the sheep their is a problem, they have no clue.
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by Avenginggecko
Avenging Gecko.
I'm tired of hearing about the PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT. ALmost everyone on here posting this stuff is just spewing out crap they heard on GB's show.
It's amazing isn't it? Glen Beck spend each day hammering the 'progressive movement' while over 17 million have no jobs...millions are losing their homes. He's trying to quell what should have already happened.
He's trying to convince people that the wealthy should keep their money ev en though MILLIONS are hurting.
That is all he is doing. Read between the lines. His SILENCE on the supreme court ruling proves it.
Country was just sold to China and other foreign interests/corporations...yet he's talking about Progressive's and CHairman Mao.
[edit on 23-1-2010 by David9176]
Originally posted by Carseller4
The 1st Amendment.
"Congress shall make no law .... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; ....."
Now that you have read this, tell me what you don't understand?
This is so simple, I am amazed and thankful the Supreme Court got it right!
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by Avenginggecko
Avenging Gecko.
I'm tired of hearing about the PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT. ALmost everyone on here posting this stuff is just spewing out crap they heard on GB's show.
It's amazing isn't it? Glen Beck spend each day hammering the 'progressive movement' while over 17 million have no jobs...millions are losing their homes. He's trying to quell what should have already happened.
He's trying to convince people that the wealthy should keep their money ev en though MILLIONS are hurting.
That is all he is doing. Read between the lines. His SILENCE on the supreme court ruling proves it.
Country was just sold to China and other foreign interests/corporations...yet he's talking about Progressive's and CHairman Mao.
[edit on 23-1-2010 by David9176]
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by Janky Red
The Dems better back off on the foreign angle.
It may end up burying Obama.
I don't know if you remember the statue of Obama built over in Indonesia.
I still have that info buried somewhere in one of my HD's.
It seems foreign money donations can be traced to his campaign.
There is a stipulation in campaign donations that anything under $200 does not have to be declared on who donated it.
McCain handed over ALL the names of donations, Obama has a list that is HUGE on the
Forget about the politicians for a minute
Do you think it is good for America to allow unlimited and unfettered ability of ANYONE FOREIGN or not to fund our political electoral process?
First, it still is not unfettered, I have to read through all the pages of both the dissenting and the majority opinions. A lot of people are making way off base assumptions on the case and the causality related. As for what I would want, how about there being a maximum level donation for all corporations and people to advertise. I would suggest this for campaigns also and disclosure of all people that have donated. Like I said, Obama has some big explaining coming on foreign funds.
I mean can a Chinese, Russian or Saudi shell corporation now come into the American market and up the AD buy in game hundreds of millions, Billions, tens of Billions
under the guise of free speech?
What is worse for the country right now is the two party strangle hold on the voting system. There was actually a town that wanted to get rid of party affiliations but the government would not let them. Does that not scare you more? Take the Representative race in NY I think where the people were going to elect a third party candidate in, until the RINO dropped out and endorsed the Democrat. There is absolute collusion and corruption happening between the two Mafia Parties. Vote for the woman/man that promises constitutional governance. Want an amendment, then start pushing.
I really think this goes beyond left and right implication wise. I would bet ALL my possessions and money right now (if possible) that ZERO founding fathers would
agree with allowing instruments of foreign governments direct manipulation of
the seating of our politicians, I wish we could do that because I would be rich and would take some of you f#@!#!@s on a drinking binge that would melt your face.
Then I would buy some politicians
I keep reading between the lines on many of these posts and what I hear is, do nothing, by providing solutions that are not realistic or practical, therefore nothing.
There is not much we can do except vote for honorable and trustworthy people. Plus, all party affiliated people need to vote out all incumbents until they get the message. This coming election has to be anti incumbent and third party all the way. We need to destroy the Two Party creature from hell.
You know you can still be who you are and preach what you believe, selectively,
you are an individual as you know, just because it is premised upon your non government interference notions does not mean it is fundamentally good in every instance... I learned that concept from people like you, great lesson for me, just reminding you, thats all.
Originally posted by endisnighe
Forget about the politicians for a minute
Do you think it is good for America to allow unlimited and unfettered ability of ANYONE FOREIGN or not to fund our political electoral process?
First, it still is not unfettered, I have to read through all the pages of both the dissenting and the majority opinions. A lot of people are making way off base assumptions on the case and the causality related. As for what I would want, how about there being a maximum level donation for all corporations and people to advertise. I would suggest this for campaigns also and disclosure of all people that have donated. Like I said, Obama has some big explaining coming on foreign funds.
I mean can a Chinese, Russian or Saudi shell corporation now come into the American market and up the AD buy in game hundreds of millions, Billions, tens of Billions
under the guise of free speech?
What is worse for the country right now is the two party strangle hold on the voting system. There was actually a town that wanted to get rid of party affiliations but the government would not let them. Does that not scare you more? Take the Representative race in NY I think where the people were going to elect a third party candidate in, until the RINO dropped out and endorsed the Democrat. There is absolute collusion and corruption happening between the two Mafia Parties. Vote for the woman/man that promises constitutional governance. Want an amendment, then start pushing.
I really think this goes beyond left and right implication wise. I would bet ALL my possessions and money right now (if possible) that ZERO founding fathers would
agree with allowing instruments of foreign governments direct manipulation of
the seating of our politicians, I wish we could do that because I would be rich and would take some of you f#@!#!@s on a drinking binge that would melt your face.
Then I would buy some politicians
I keep reading between the lines on many of these posts and what I hear is, do nothing, by providing solutions that are not realistic or practical, therefore nothing.
There is not much we can do except vote for honorable and trustworthy people. Plus, all party affiliated people need to vote out all incumbents until they get the message. This coming election has to be anti incumbent and third party all the way. We need to destroy the Two Party creature from hell.
You know you can still be who you are and preach what you believe, selectively,
you are an individual as you know, just because it is premised upon your non government interference notions does not mean it is fundamentally good in every instance... I learned that concept from people like you, great lesson for me, just reminding you, thats all.
I am actually a very straight forward guy. This country has one chance left. If we do not get our act together, the fall elections will be the last elections.
Heck, if we even make it to the elections this fall. This decision was used to implement more division. This kind of stuff just does not happen by coincidence.
A friend and I were trying to come up with what they were going to do to stop the momentum of the election of Scott Brown. Got to give it to the men behind the mask.
Perfect timing. I should do some research on how long this stuff was being worked on of how long it was sat on.
Originally posted by endisnighe
reply to post by Ahabstar
This decision does not allow for direct campaign donations to be increased.
This decision has to do with independant advertisement.
Everyone please read the McCain Feingold bill.
Here it is-McCain Feingold Bill
``(c) Limitation.--The committee shall not accept any donation from
a foreign national (as defined in section 319(b) of the Federal Election
Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b))).