It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Me and others have already explained to you what we believe happened.
1)You refuse to accept that only people have a right to free speach.
2)Corporations are immortal business entities and thus not people.
3)Even if corporations were treated as people, allowing them to bribe politicians may not be criminal by definition, but is highely unethical/immoral.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Yes I believe in big government and the need for restrictions on business and people. If that makes me a marxist, then so be it! Actuallly, I like to think of myself as a centrist.
If it was up to me I would ban all campaign contributions, regardless of origin. I do not care if its a corporation, a union or joe shmoe. The tax-payers should pay the entire bill!
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Democrats and republicans differ in theory but essentially they are the same. Thanks for the discussion, I got to log-off because a storm is causing my dsl connection to fail.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
For clarification sakes, I am neither Republican nor Democrat and blame is irrelevant. Both parties rely heavily upon corporate funding, and it takes little research to find out how much so. A site known as opensecrets.com is a good start.
Both parties are behind corporatism, and Congress it the culprit for first creating the Federal Reserve, and now bailing out corporations deemed "too big too fail". You realize that there are anti-trust laws that are intended to keep corporations from becoming too big too fail, right?
Both parties have betrayed the American people and worked together to usurp the government of the people, for the people and by the people.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
For clarification sakes, I am neither Republican nor Democrat and blame is irrelevant. Both parties rely heavily upon corporate funding, and it takes little research to find out how much so. A site known as opensecrets.com is a good start.
Both parties are behind corporatism, and Congress it the culprit for first creating the Federal Reserve, and now bailing out corporations deemed "too big too fail". You realize that there are anti-trust laws that are intended to keep corporations from becoming too big too fail, right?
Both parties have betrayed the American people and worked together to usurp the government of the people, for the people and by the people.
If people can't tell the difference between freedom of speech and corporate donations then what hope do we have have of changing things for the better?
I am sorry but I will never agree with you on that issue...
[edit on 3-2-2010 by EarthCitizen07]
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Corporations would love for this country to be a democracy so ignoramuses like you could vote away the 1st Amendment, thereby allowing Congress to silence your speech. Of course, I don't expect you to understand this, as you have demonstrated how ignorant you insist on remaining.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Corporations would love for this country to be a democracy so ignoramuses like you could vote away the 1st Amendment, thereby allowing Congress to silence your speech. Of course, I don't expect you to understand this, as you have demonstrated how ignorant you insist on remaining.
Yeah corporations love democracies
What zulu planet do you live on?
As for "freedom of speech" who needs it after the treasonous PATRIOT ACT and DHS? I mean really we are one step away from nazi germany but it won't be a socialist dicatorship "my friend", it will be A WORLD CORPORATE DICTATORSHIP!
Wake up and smell the coffee before it is too late. I am sure that is exactly what you want despite all the "For the record I am neither democrat or republican" bs! At least I have the balls to admit I am a democrat only because it is the lesser of two evils.
I have travelled the world and know the difference between conservatives and liberals and no amount of hodge-podge disinfo(the kind your serving) can change the truth.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
If it was up to me I would ban all campaign contributions, regardless of origin. I do not care if its a corporation, a union or joe shmoe.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
A lot of hot air with no meaning! You even went as far as saying "the same people who brought you the patriot act and department of homeland security".
Guess what "pal", I didn't vote for bush/cheney! Maybe you did? So who exactly is the coward? You even pretend to be neutral as though that is possible. If you truely were neutral then you would not be stalking posters who disagree with you thread after thread.
"Thanks" for wasting my time and your going on my "respected" foes list as of now.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
As for your above quote, you cannot ban contribution as they are a tool of political speech. It would set a dangerous p residence as politicians would have an in-road to banning speech that is in connection with money.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
As for your above quote, you cannot ban contribution as they are a tool of political speech. It would set a dangerous p residence as politicians would have an in-road to banning speech that is in connection with money.
Only far-right conservatives interpret monetary contributions as "a tool of political speech". A pure definition of money and speech reveals the two are different words with different meanings. It's really simple, I don't understand why some people have such a hard time comprehending the difference.
Further removing the restrictions of 441b will only worsten the corporate influence upon government, as though it wasn't bad to begin with. No one should be allowed to donate/contribute anything to a political campaign. This happens only in the "good ole" usa with its so called freedom, justice and liberty for all.
Originally posted by purple23
Yay! more power in the hands of the corporations. Like they don't already have enough?
For those of you who would prefer the power in the hands of the people, here's a solution: Ban all campaign contributions. Allow the candidates television access instead. Television access is free. The majority of Americans watch television. It is a win/win scenario.
Each candidate could be allotted a certain amount of time on air. Each candidate could present their platform in the time that they are allotted. The people could then form their decision from their.
There would be no need for advertising. There would be no need for trips throughout the country in order to speak to constituents face to face. The majority of people don't even turn up for those events anyway, so what is the point?
Campaigning over the airwaves would all but eliminate the need for financial contributions. Thus eliminating corruption, bribery, and lobbying all in one shot.
This may be slightly simplistic, however I have thought a great deal about this topic.
Perhaps others could expound upon this idea.