posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 01:39 AM
Before you blast me on the constitutionality of Obama's Executive Order, remember Bush's Patriot Act did way more damage to your civil liberties
than any other ratified document in our history!
Open your conspiracist mind to a .... What if ...
Say, you were the brand new boss of the corporation, sittin' in the big seat. There were a lot of things you wanted to get accomplished but ...
-You knew or suspected there was major corruption with some of the managers in one or more of your departments?
-And / or - knew or suspected unauthorized use of the assets these departments have at their disposal by those managers or their rich friends?
What if there was personal in association with these rogues who held high positions in the very body of enforcement you would normally rely on to
police those managers and their departments? How could you trust them to investigate, gather evidence and detain the suspects when they may be
compromised as well? Not just to the point of tipping off the corrupted - but actively waylaying any investigation into what is really going on in
your house - effectively stopping it cold? And, furthermore;
Let's say there is enough evidence pointing towards misconduct by your predecessor, the CEO who had the office before you, and some of his executive
officers? The problem is if you were seen to be the driving force in bringing him to justice it would cause major dissension from around half of your
managerial staff and their associates. And even worse, it would alienate a large percentage of your customers against you as well. You still had
things you wanted to get done ... you are so pissed that guy left you this mess and put you in this position.
There is an independent police force that has the capability to handle these pressing matters within your corporation, and you would be insulated from
any backlash when those baddies are brought down. The thing is, these guys will need 'Carte Blanche' in order to do their thing effectively and
move about unhindered, and not be subject to those company policies that would give your enforcement branch (and maybe those you are trying to ferret
out) an opportunity to throw wrenches in the works, so to speak.
Now, how to get these independents inside the company without halving to bring it to a vote by all the managers at the weekly meeting? Because you
have executive privilege to write Company Policies (This is the very reason the privilege was put in place) you choose to delete two key constraints
that were written into a older policy by a former CEO that is still in effect today. Moreover; to distract the managers and their cronies, you claim
it will help in the major sales campaign that everyone knows is going on. Some of the consumer watch dogs get wind of the changes and start asking
questions, but not wanting those mis-managing managers to become suspicious, you tell the company spokesperson to quell the story and not release any
more details and, thankfully, the watch dogs don't press it.
Just to be obvious I'll spell out the substitutions:
The boss, CEO = The President;
Company, corporation = The US Government;
Managers, rogues = Members of Congress and /or Heads of government agencies;
Departments = All of Congress, Governmental Agencies and compartments;
Assets = Property, information, personnel and abilities of the agency or agencies;
Rich friends = The ones with the power and money that may influence all of the above;
independent police force = INTERPOL;
Weekly meeting = Sessions of Congress;
Body of enforcement = Any of the anagrammed ABC's who supposedly enforce the law;
CEO who had the office before you = Bush;
Company Policies = Executive Orders;
Delete two key constraints = Executive Order 12425;
Older policy = Executive Order 13524;
Former CEO = President Reagan;
Major sales campaign = War on terror;
Consumer watch dogs = The news media;
Company spokesperson = White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs