It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
However, I'm still waiting for one shred of evidence on your behalf.
I provided info about HAARP,
(Technical info that was obviously above yours and Phage's head)
I also provided info from the former secretary of Defense William Cohen
Originally posted by Essan
reply to post by Donny 4 million
The Caribbean is a complex tectonic region - but the major faultlines are very well known, including the one which caused the recent Haitian earthquakes.
Now, why do you think this one earthquake was caused by HAARP but not any of the hundreds of others around the world that took place the same day? Indeed, I daresay there were several earthquakes in various places around the same time. Even is HAARP were an earthquake machine and not just a tea making device, how do you know which earthquake it was causing?
[edit on 27-1-2010 by Essan]
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by Donny 4 million
You, and a handful of others, have been inferring that throughout this entire thread. Why else would the topic of HAARP be brought up in a conversation about the Haitian earthquake? Please.
Originally posted by sweetpeanc
So was my microwave. Must be my fault then, right?
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by Donny 4 million
No, you didn't say that in so many words. In that much, you are correct. You, and several others did, however, infer it quite often through out this thread.
Originally posted by Helmkat
Originally posted by Imagir
reply to post by davesidious
Your feints and continuous mistifications are a gigantic nonsense.
You continues to deny the evidence going in circle without to supply some solid support to your ideas.
I know already this way to argue.
The old school,... true?
Perhaps a mirror is in order because you are doing exactly the same thing. When solid observations and data is presented to the contrary of your worldview, suddenly its all about denial of your evidence, which is pure speculation.
Modus operandi perhaps?
[edit on 27-1-2010 by Helmkat]
And I might want to add that the last patent is a bit scary. Nuclear sized explosions without radiation. We have been trying to achieve this for years with cold fusion which was merely a "theory." As it were, apparently scientists are attempting to make this a reality through the infinite power of RF frequencies.
Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
United States Patent 4873928
A method for producing a high yield explosion without radioactive fallout comprising filling an expendible structure with an explosive mixture of a combustible gas (e.g. methane) and an oxidizer gas (e.g. oxygen) and then detonating said mixture.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
And I might want to add that the last patent is a bit scary. Nuclear sized explosions without radiation. We have been trying to achieve this for years with cold fusion which was merely a "theory." As it were, apparently scientists are attempting to make this a reality through the infinite power of RF frequencies.
Yup. Great researcher you is.
Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
United States Patent 4873928
A method for producing a high yield explosion without radioactive fallout comprising filling an expendible structure with an explosive mixture of a combustible gas (e.g. methane) and an oxidizer gas (e.g. oxygen) and then detonating said mixture.
www.freepatentsonline.com...
It's called a fuel-air bomb.
[edit on 1/27/2010 by Phage]