Originally posted by Sean48
You made a speech , away from the question, and of course lesser minds fell for it
QUESTION again: A Judge Not allowing pertinent witnesses and evidence to be presented , to seek the truth.
Dave . Im not the Tri guy , answer please.
I don't know how many times I gotta say this...you need to stop going to these damned fool conspiracy web sites for your information, becuase all
they want to do is play mind games with your head and get you all paranoid over shadows. The material you're quoting is being heavily edited by this
Tom Flocco character, and his writeup is just plain godawful bad.
For one thing, I looked up this judge this con artist is griping about, and I see the judge is actually involved with quite a number of 9/11 related
cases, but Flocco is merging together with his fast and loose presentation so I can't find any specific details. Here is a short list of cases
Hellerstein is ruling on-
Hellerstein court cases
I don't know the details of the case that Flocco is referring to, but if it's anything like the request for the parents of Paul Wesley Ambrose to
subpoena C. Everett Koop to "prove" their son could have become surgeon general some day, it obviously was dismissed becuase it was speculative and
had absolutely nothign to do with anything. I absolutely guarantee that the judge declared why these particular requests were overturned becuase
judges have to declare why such requests were overturned. I also likewise guarantee that this con artist Tom Flocco guy knows why the judge
overturned the requests- he would have to know if he knows all these other details- but he isn't telling you what it is becuase he's a con artist
and wants to get you to think something sinister is going on. You asked me why the judge overturned these requests, so I put the question back to
you- what reason did the judge give in his decision in overturning these requests? I don't know and Flocco refuses to tell us.
Then there's THIS cute little stunt Tom Flocco is trying to pull...
It is not known whether evidence sequestered in the TSA “reading room” indicates whether Bush administration officials met with airline
executives to discuss strong evidence in the form of pre-9/11 presidential briefs and personal experience in Genoa, Italy with Muslim air attack
threats—either of which would implicate President Bush and/or the airline executives themselves as having prior knowledge of the attacks while
either failing to take strong and decisive action or letting them occur to fulfill other unnamed geo-political, financial or oil agendas.
This is 100% Flocco's own editorial, not from the court proceedings, and it's nothing but innuendo. Take a look at the following:
"It is not known whether police ever interviewed Sean48 on whether he had any sexual contact with children or contact of any kind with children
who have been abducted and are currently missing, either of which would implicate Sean48 as being a possible sexual predator involved in possible
homicides of unknown numbers of children"
All I did was change the names and events that Flocco listed, and I just accused you of being a child molestor and murderer without ever actually
coming out and saying you're a child molestor and murderer. Note I never said anywhere that you ARE a child molestor OR a murderer, so if anyone
read this and got the idea you're a child molestor/murderer, hey, it's not my fault, he came up with that idea on his own.
I posted this becuase Tom Flocco is pulling EXACTLY the very same innuendo dropping stunt here, with these supposed meetings with airline officials
and supposed intelligence briefings supposedly to fulfull a supposed secret agenda, all to get you to believe somethign sinister is going on without
comign out and saying it. Why is he doing this? BECUASE HE'S ONE OF THOSE CON ARTISTS BEHIND THOSE DAMNED FOOL CONSPIRACY WEB SITES TRYING TO GET
YOU ALL PARANOID OVER SHADOWS, that's why. You're not making Tom Flocco look good. Going to Tom Flocco is only making yourselves look bad.
All this really is neither here nor there, actually. If you conspiracy people have to resort to arguing over such fringe, outer space topics like
"why did the judge overturn subpoena requests" in order to keep your conspiracy stories alive, you might as well go find a different conspiracy to