reply to post by Lasheic
Wow, thank you for the brilliant and highly educational reply. I will have to re-read most of it over some time for it all to sink in. The
reason being that I know nothing scientifically about the brain, I've not studied and attained the education you so obviously have.
I instead did my own research via participation, first hand you might say. I cannot prove a single thing to you, and it is not my place to. I cannot
explain in simple words that have no allegiance to concepts of how information comes to me prior to events. There is a process, I can tell you how it
works for me, but we will not reach an understanding about it.
You are superior in education, granted. I am simply open and honest about my experiences of a most unusual life and the undestandings it has brought
There is a richness of beauty and texture to this Universe far grander than most people realize.
Yes there is. In my living experience we actively participate in it rather than clinically study it. It is a living thing we are part of.
Proofs, all the educated want is proofs, something to nail down and say it is "This". No dream journals are kept by me, I am not into the ritual
like so many. Yes, I could be some nutter going on about new-agey airy-fairy rubbish, but that would be highly disappointing although many times I
have thought it would be preferable to living in many worlds at one time and being aware of the activities of such around us..
As for the Randi prize, why would anyone want to do it? Seriously, the money is not important to me, I'm just not a materialist. I don't have
rampant ego so don't need the kudos or peer group pats on the back, all of that is worthless to me. My life is simple and I am content with it while
I serve humanity with what I am able to offer. I've walked my own road and do not wish to be lumped in with all the weirdos, religionists, new-agers,
chanellers.. you know what I mean. All those things are for followers, I instead explored consciousness from within it. I know that may be an
offensive notion to you.
At no time have I ever sought the limelight for what I do, my work and the things I teach people are very personal to me. At no time have I ever
wanted to be quantified, I simply never saw the reasoning for it. I studied psychology at Uni, it was horribly biased by the way, and I learned how
easy it is to design tests or experiments to produce a bias outcome, which is when I understood that the people who want to do the quanitfying have
absolutely no idea about how this stuff works. They know all the mechanical side of it, and the theoretical behaviour side but not the working of it.
How is it possible for them to design an experiment that will show a positive outcome?
Then how do you account for the severing of the Corpus Callosum resulting in two distinct consciousnesses in isolation, while the patient is only
perceptually aware of one? How are there two distinct wills acting independently and agnostic of each other - yet a seemingly single conscious
observer who is unaware of either of them being separate?
Are you saying that a living human's brain was severed and resulted in their being two or more distinct personalities? Perhaps the trauma caused a
fracturing as in multiple personality disorder? I don't have an answer for you based on this scenario.
By what mechanism does the soul interface with the brain? By the pattern of synaptic firing? No, that's well understood and mathematically defined.
What exactly is the molecule or compound in the brain which interacts with the soul, so that it may empower the flesh? Can we then extract or
sequester this agent outside of the brain so as to create "soul/reality" interfaces with technology? Why bother creating AI when a "Soul
Co-Processor" can be installed in your PC? Do you see the problem I'm trying to get at?
Good questions, and I'm sure you might have some great answers yourself.
All I know is this; the thing we call Awareness is not a biological function. I do not think everything is as well ordered and pidgeon-holed as we
humans like to believe it is. That is one of the issues I have with the very well educated is that according to them there is no other possibility.
One thing that is victim to its heavy handed approach is our human heritage. We are losing as much of our inherent knowledge and abilities as we are
gaining from our modern endeavours.
I'm sorry that I cannot provide what you demand from me. What I have done here is to share as openly and honestly as I could from my experiences
without seeking reward or kudos. I made no claims, but I did share.
This does not fit your world view, and I do not wish to be offered new limitations on your behalf. Nowhere left to go with it other than to ask how
does the operation of Remote Viewing Units in many countries military fit in with your world view?