Originally posted by djusdjus
I laugh at people who think anarchy will work.
HOW? How will no government be better tahn having one?
what about that school system that educated you to a point where you can read what's written here and wriute a response? Was that the result of anarchy?
early america was a republic and confederation of states as declared, not a state of anarchy.
anarchy can only work with small, accountable and responsible populations.
there are far too many lazy minded, lazy body people to even ponder anarchy in the modern world.
somalia is anarchy (without a ruler) right now. Do you think that is preferable to where you are right now in front of your computer that you pay to read this on?
How about Sudan? Prefer that sort of thing?
I wish people would have even one or two thoughts before they start spouting fresh nonsense. Would be lovely as a cuppa!
I would submit to you who want anarchy that you, personally, are not responsible enough, willful enough, or capable enough of living within it. Prove me wrong if you think you are. Get off the grid, stop collecting dole and go out there into teh world an live it.
My money is on "you can't".
Oh... and about Somalia...
You should do a little research on the country, they've actually managed to develop better infrastructure and a more bustling economy than many African countries with centralized government/economies.
Now I'm not saying Somalia is the best example of Anarchy... however, they have actually done some remarkable things without a real nation-state to speak of. There is definitely quite a bit of violence/chaos there... and it is sort of an Anarcho-capitalist (not good) haven. However, things are not all bad in Somalia, some decent examples are actually being demonstrated.


compared to,say, North Korea.