Originally posted by wholetruth
i was just defending the OP not the OS.
I thought you had nothing else to say to me? I guess that was a lie?
I am really not sure what you want to call it.
you don't believe it, fine?
Was I supposed to?
it is an alternative explanation based on real human beings observations.
all i am saying is there is no evidence that the plane was shot down and there is plenty of evidence that it didn't crash and continued flying
Actually, if the debris field is to be believed, that would be evidence of a shoot down but the fact that the SOD Told us it was shot down is
evidence of a shoot down.
You said there is NO evidence. Rummy gave us evidence whether you like it or not.
you don't consider eyewitnesses reliable.
So you are a debunker? I have yet to have any legitimate person in search of the truth resort to putting words in my mouth. I never said that and you
know I never said that and that is why there is no corresponding quote to back it up. I will not argue with fantasy.
yet you want proof.
Even if I did not believe any eyewitness anywhere, I think asking for proof is not out of line. That is how we got forensics. People tend to be wrong
and/or lie. I guess the way every investigative body in the country approaches a crime scene and myself are all wrong. Please school us.
sorry, i dont ask the fbi for evidence that they're lying about 9/11.
i went out and got my own.
Back to fantasy land are we? I am pretty sure I never claimed to use the FBI as a reliable source for anything either.
you think 'something not quite right' but you dont believe the OP of this thread because it didn't include alex jones favorite shoot down
theory and donald rumsfeld confirming it for you.
LOL. You just like being wrong don't you? Please feel free to browse my post history and see what I think of Alex Jones. I will give you a hint - I
am not a fan. You should really refrain from assuming when the evidence is actually available. I have made no shortage of remarks in regard to that
fat, lying, sob.
Have any other incorrect things to say or assume?
you seek confirmation from authority when the eyewitnesses are right in front of you telling you what happened.
Never said that.
you want to say susan mcelwain saw a ufo [which is not what she said, she said it had to be either a missile or some sort of drone/military
Sigh. Was it an object? YES. Was it flying? YES. Did she identify it? NOPE. It was a UFO. I am very sorry that you have a personal issue with words
and what they mean but what she claims she saw would be a UFO. Please get over this. Your petty personal feelings on the issue will not help you get
to the bottom of it in any way.
you saw viola's interview so you dont need to acknowledge viola corroborating her and even saying it was a military plane and you dont care
about rick chaney corroborating both of them and adding the fbi came around and told them to shut their mouths about it.
You have 3 people telling a story. I never said it is not compelling. It is just not proof of anything. Think about what you are saying. More than 3
people are claiming it was shot down. More than 3 people claim it was overtaken by passengers. What makes your 3 people any more credible?
the fbi told quite a few people to shut their mouths about it.
Who? When? Can you provide any proof other than their own words and then another post of video of those same words?
you can dismiss all that. its fine with me.
Apparently not as you took all this time out just for me to address exactly that very issue right there.
you can dismiss the indian lake accounts. its fine with me.
i'm not 'debating' or arguing, nor am i trying to convince anyone. i did the work. when i see it being discussed i clarify things.
That is a blatant lie since I was never discussing any of your work when you decided to chime in. You might be new to the printed word. I can go back
and read where this started and read what you just wrote and simply see if they actually jive. They do not. Welcome to the internet.
i dont care if you believe me, i know for myself. i kept my word to everyone i have ever met that was a witness.
You already told me you were done talking to me and went on so I am sure your complete lack of concern for my trust will yield results every bit as