It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueTruth
reply to post by K J Gunderson
a makeshift lab was set up at the Pennsylvania National Guard Armory near the Somerset County Airport. the majority of the remains were identified.
Originally posted by TrueTruth
reply to post by K J Gunderson
who cares if it was the precise crash spot? are they supposed to make a morgue in a field?
and who? read the links. it's all there.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by hooper
The remains of the all the last known occupants of the plane invovled in Flight 93 were all positively identified at the crash site.
Oh, I'm sorry, that's not real because you refuse to acknowledge it, and as we all know, you and you alone are the measure of the all things and the master of reality.
Well I am the one one that is sorry here because this is some pretty sad stuff. Not one body was actually identified at the crash site. You apparently have no clue what chain of custody means because there was no lab at the "crash" site.
What you just said is plain incorrect but I am sure you have an excuse for that.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Kevin --- if this bothers you so much, then do this:
Find ANY example of an airplane crash where the coroner set up the temp morgue to identify remains ON SITE.
Just one example, please.
Originally posted by hooper
Sorry, for a moment I thought I was addressing rational adults who would know that, of course, the actual identification process was handled off-site for remains collected at the site.
The remains of the all the last known occupants of the plane invovled in Flight 93 were all positively identified at the crash site.
Originally posted by TrueTruth
reply to post by K J Gunderson
you can talk about chain of custody all you like.
since when do people process remains AT a crime scene?
the coroner helped pick the remains from teh wreckage with his own hands.
is that not good enough for chain of custody?
and if you have a point with this issue - spell it out. flesh out this supposed custody issue. who did what with the remains?
and don't forget - the coroner was right there, on the scene.
this is another dead end.
for what point?
to shelter your egos, folks. nothing more.
it's ok to be wrong.
it's not ok to pretend you're right in the face of conclusive evidence.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by K J Gunderson
"Deflection"?
Please answer my question.
Enough with the ad homs.
Please, don't avooid the question.
Everyone would like to know why the procedures for identifying remains at the UAL 93 crash site should have been different from the procedues at any other airplane crash site...including other cases where criminal activity was suspected.
Isn't it reasonalbe to understand that the identification process, especially in the case of a suspected criminal case, be handled in the best facilities possible, not some make-shift on-site tent?
I most certainly apologize if my error was taking the words you used to mean what they actually mean.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Isn't it reasonalbe to understand that the identification process, especially in the case of a suspected criminal case, be handled in the best facilities possible, not some make-shift on-site tent?
Originally posted by hooper
The human remains found at the crash site were identified.
Originally posted by hooper
All apologies are mine, I do understand the language, I just continually overestimate the target audience.
To clarify:
The human remains found at the crash site were identified.
As to the chain of custody - moot point entirely. The chain of custody docs would have been completed by those whom you consider prime suspects, so to provide you with any "evidence" is simply an exercise in futility.
Originally posted by themove1904
hi, i lived 5 miles from Lockerbie and i drove by the crater made by part of the fuselage of the plane that came down,on numerous occasions.The crater was far larger than this one and i know the wings, cockpit,engines etc were found miles apart.This section of the plane would not be coming down as fast as the one on 911 so why was the crater at Lockerbie far larger.Im new to this posting but if you google photo of Lockerbie crater you will see what i mean.