Obama's Favorite For Supreme Court Justice Sunstein Wants To Ban Guns, Free Speech

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:00 AM
link   


Cass Sunstein, president Obama’s appointee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and the man who outlined a plan for the government to infiltrate "conspiracy groups" in order to undermine them, is in direct line for a promotion to Supreme Court Justice.

Sunstein, already in an advanced position of power in the White House as Regulatory czar, has already called for strict restrictions on gun ownership, an internet "Fairness Doctrine", and an effective ban on free speech where dissenting opinions to those of the government are expressed.


That's correct you can kiss your guns good by if that creature gets in office. The supreme court is corrupt. When Sotomayor got into power i know she was bad


infowars.net...




posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:27 AM
link   
If they're trying to take our guns away,theirs definitely something big coming.



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:31 AM
link   
300,000,000 to 500,000,000 guns and one retard in power hmm figure that out i just can't see it happening at least we now know the truth more and more as each day passes this will just wake more people up


Say hi to your 3rd reich the nazi powers

[edit on 19-1-2010 by OpTiMuS_PrImE]



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:36 AM
link   
It feels like the grab is picking up momentum.

These recent "gun show bans" come to mind. WA state proposing its own "assault weapons ban." The Brady bunch just rated Obama an F for his first year.

That impending doom sensation I had when he was first elected is creeping back up.



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:47 AM
link   
More ridiculous "what if", "maybe" fear mongering from Obama haters.
Guys, do you ever stop being paranoid that somebody is going to take your guns away? Is this a lifestyle for you?
Whatever this guy thinks, it's a long long way from him becoming a Supreme Court Justice. But why wait? Start raving now!
Infowars as a source? The World Weekly News is more credible!



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 10:54 AM
link   
Ron Paul

Obama confidants spine-chilling proposal, and even more muck

bulletins.myspace.com...



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 11:17 AM
link   
I see the Crippled Epistemologist is at it again!!


Is it just me or does it seem the chess pieces are afoot?

We need a "suspicious emoticon", one eyebrow raised or something.



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 11:53 AM
link   
I never understood how requiring a for profit station to provide access for multiple viewpoints is a ban on or even restricts free speech. It no way restricts what the talking heads can say. It merely requires equal time for opposing views.

One could actually make the argument that free speech is being restricted without the fairness doctrine. As stations only will allow viewpoints which are the most profitable for them. The others will be locked out.



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kaploink
It merely requires equal time for opposing views.

One could actually make the argument that free speech is being restricted without the fairness doctrine. As stations only will allow viewpoints which are the most profitable for them. The others will be locked out.


You said it, "it merely requires". This is a ridiculous argument that has no basis in anything other than a legislatively prescribed left/right paradigm.

I see no purpose in forcing anyone to provide equal time for the uncountable viewpoints (if we wanted to do this properly).

Do you think they would make time for the white power movement in a discussion about racial profiling? The terrorist's point of view in a discussion on the war on terror?

There is no convincing rationale for the fairness doctrine other than to continue the left/right circular arguments.



posted on Jan, 19 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kaploink
One could actually make the argument that free speech is being restricted without the fairness doctrine. As stations only will allow viewpoints which are the most profitable for them. The others will be locked out.


So I'm a for-profit station and the gov requires me to air a bunch of shows that have amazingly low ratings during which I couldnt give away advertising time in the name of "equal time."

Solution, air my regular successful programming at regular hours. From 1AM to 6AM air the mandated trash.

I satisfy a stupid government mandate and shows that nobody wanted to watch are still going unwatched. The only outcome is that now gov has more "control" over peoples daily lives and the guys from Girls Gone Wild will have to run their infomercials on a different network.






top topics



 
3

log in

join