Site Predicts Major Brown Victory: Do You Agree?

I saw this this morning on a site I read, saying that Obama is hurting Coakley's chances in Massachusetts. What's more, it's based off of polling data from what happened after Obama stumped in Virginia and New Jersey last November:

jumpinginpools.blogspot.com...

It predicts an 8% victory for Brown over Coakley. But what do you, my fellow ATSers think? Bull? Right on the money? Personally, I think the margin of victory is a little high, but that Brown will win in the end.

[edit on 19-1-2010 by ineverknew]

I don't know what this has to do with U.S. political madness.

I don't know who will win.

I know about both candidates however and I'm not the least bit surprised conservatives are desperate enough to back a man who is pro-abortion, voted for Romneycare, and at one point was for a cap and trade policy before he was against it.

If Brown is elected and starts voting hard right as many are hoping in Massachusetts of all places, he won't be seeing a second full six year term in 2012.

If Coakley wins I predict loud cries of fraud by ACORN from the right as I've been hearing ever since November 2008. Glenn Beck has already accused ACORN (and liberals in general) for fixing the election for Coakley, so I'm right about this already.

[edit on 19-1-2010 by Frith]

Mass. does not require proof of identification to vote so I would say that anything is possible in this long standing democratic stronghold. Vote early, vote often.

This is going to be messy. I can already envision boxes of uncounted ballots being "found" in the trunk of someone's car. The Minnesota debacle is still fresh in my mind.

Brown should win, IMO.

That is what it is looking like to me, anyways.

And I hope he does based on this quote alone:

Brown has an R next to his name. Therefore he will win. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents will come together and cast their vote for the man with the R next to his name.

Whether Brown wins or loses is up to just how much criminal control the Democrats have over the hacked Diebold voting machines that the Democrats personally control to ensure their victorious wins.

Voter fraud and unauthorized access to the Diebold results will determine who wins. As such, I would hope Brown could win honestly and without the Democrats going nuclear on him, but I believe they already have and that implies that someone from the Democratic socialist Obama regime will do whatever it takes to ensure Brown does not win.

Sooner than later we should demand an end to all the voter fraud and all the corruption that gets committed by both parties trying to hold on to power in order to ensure they continue to get the millions in bribes from their corporate clients. Time will tell if Brown won on his own or if he lost based on suspicious voting irregularities.

Let us hope that the Democrats don't show us again just how much of a corrupt party they are in regard to ethical and moral values.

I do not understand why they can't just make an open source voting program.

It is not that hard.

I can do it, and I am just learning how to program.

Looking at the polls, I believe that Brown will win. My question is, if he does win, how will the Democratic Party handle it? There are mumblings from them about delaying Brown's swearing-in until after a vote is taken on the Healthcare bill.

Coakley will win. Folks, its Massachusetts, and that's Ted Kennedy's seat. There's no way in hell that the Democrats will allow Brown to win, especially with their agenda riding on one vote in the Senate. They will pull out all the stops to get Coakley in office and will succeed.

All of this stuff about Brown leading is a case of the Democrats playing the expectations game. When Coakley wins, as expected, they will claim that it as a bellwether of the national political mood and that Coakley won despite all odds, when, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

Originally posted by vor78
Coakley will win. Folks, its Massachusetts, and that's Ted Kennedy's seat.

. . .

reply to post by Lemon.Fresh


Tell that to the Democrats.

I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see them losing this seat, especially not right now. Granted, in a fair fight, Brown would probably win, but this will not be a fair fight.

Guess the prediction was right!


Awesomesauce!

Originally posted by vor78
Coakley will win. Folks, its Massachusetts, and that's Ted Kennedy's seat. There's no way in hell that the Democrats will allow Brown to win, especially with their agenda riding on one vote in the Senate. They will pull out all the stops to get Coakley in office and will succeed.

All of this stuff about Brown leading is a case of the Democrats playing the expectations game. When Coakley wins, as expected, they will claim that it as a bellwether of the national political mood and that Coakley won despite all odds, when, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

Brown won and (go figure) the prediction was right on the money.

I live in MA, and from what I am hearing from other people in my neighborhood, they voted for Brown to stop Obamacare from being passed. That seems to be my local voice of course, but I'm almost in CT in Western MA, so we could just be a bit diff'rnt from the other beaners^^.

reply to post by ineverknew


I know and I'm glad he won. I was hoping for the best, but expecting the worst. With any luck, this will add some balance and, more importantly, some sanity back to the government.