Originally posted by MolecularPhD
reply to post by YouAreDreaming
What an amazing paper. Well written and very much based on a real scientific method. Whether I believe the author or not, his approach to his idea was
well thought out and calculated. I am sending this to a few of my friends who are Theoretical Quantum Physicists to get their opinions on the subject.
I'm not one who dismisses Cause, but you must have an objective mind as a Scientist; however improbable this may or may not be.
I am sure we will both agree that the majority of our Science exists within the realm of ideas and theories. How ever we reduce matter down to the
fundamental quantum states; we discover over and over this “information system
” that matter exists as.
Photons exhibiting Qubits in states of quantum superposition speak highly of a reality based on information systems. What we are doing in our
theoretical understudies is trying to describe scientifically how these systems act in regards to the data they represent. That gives us our
classical physics as we describe the interaction of matter within a confined set of physical laws.
If we reduce everything down into data and information systems then the act of rendering this data into reality becomes apparent with the act of
observation. The conscious model of reality that our mind generates is based entirely on input of data through biological sensors and this is a
critical thought as it surfaces again and again:
Take incoherent data in the form of audio,visual, tactile, smell, taste and convert the data from a range of electromagnetic, chemical, thermal
exchanges into a bio-electric current which then further transforms within the quantum states of the brain into coherent photons. From this very
small quantum coherency we have the start of a neurological rendering farm that begins a process by which our mind then generates a virtual reality
model of sensory data and projects this model into a holographic view by which we; the observe exists within to observe yet again; this mental
rendering of reality.
It's a very recursive feedback system for what we call the “self” or the “me” inside of all this subjective humanized awareness.
If we imagine as an idea that reality exists as a data stream, and our body acts as the interface; then it is the mind that acts as the rendering
engine that translates this incoherent data into a coherent model.
This virtual reality theory applies fully to our mental function that is required to create a virtual reality; even if it fails at physical reality
However... before we dismiss this possibility; we need to look further into self-similar systems such as the Holographic Principle; Mandlebrot's
fractal; quantum dipoles and dyads. The very building block of our reality appears to be based on iterating processes showing self-similar patterns
in a scale factor. Which in itself is very alluding towards an information system.
Take this data stream and change it during sleep. The same act of perception applies within a dream state where only the data stream has changed;
ergo a new virtual reality emerges by which we participate in this micro-reality in the form of a dream.
If you do have any self-evidence of dreams that come true; then a recursive feedback interface based on a virtual reality system really starts to tie
some loose ends together in a bigger model of reality as an information system.
However; one based on organized thought. And I can really chase this rabbit hole down in great depth as to how thought plays a role in organizing
information into these data streams. Curious isn't it? A thought / reality dyad?
[edit on 29-1-2010 by YouAreDreaming]
Just another bio physicist on quantum coherent photons in the brain:
[edit on 29-1-2010 by YouAreDreaming]