It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

13 Year old boy has Time Machine plan that works

page: 11
30
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


Yes by email. Thanks for the confirmation.

BTW, if the higgs field exists, how does this effect it.




posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by sunspot0
 



i very much doubt it. i dont have time to read the next 10 pages but here's some comments.
1. there is only now. forget about time travel.
2. black holes are a hypothesis only, and have never been proven.
3. if it did work, show it built and established rather than theorising.



posted on Jan, 21 2010 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by orangutang
 


1.)Now is observable in a limited amount. Time cannot be divided by infinity and they do know what both the pixel and instant moment of the universe are. That being the smallest possible piece of space time able to be cut, and the smallest amount of time quantifiable, respectively.

2.) Not being able to observe it does not make it nonexistent. Indirect observation exists for a reason and has yet to been proven unworkable. Secondly, we CAN observe the even thorizon of the black hole in the figure that it MUST exist to explain things. Black holes have been observed. Soon in the form of micro black holes at CERN and currently in their larger forms in space. Jets of matter coming from galaxies and their spinning nature can only be described by gravity. Anything electrical, and conspiracy theorists claim, would be either a ring or a sphere, not a disk.

cdsweb.cern.ch...

upload.wikimedia.org...

en.wikipedia.org...

There are many others.




3. if it did work, show it built and established rather than theorising.


much of what the boy claims has been documented both in space and on Earth.

[edit on 21-1-2010 by Gorman91]



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 01:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


None of that except the light taking time to travel makes any sense to me. I know light perceived by us had to travel from a source, and depending on the distance traveled the time from source to perception varies. I don't know how a singularity/blackhole could magically know the "age" of photons that enter it. Regardless of this particular hang up of mine, I think this whole theory is bunk for a multitude of other reasons.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 03:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by FromaboveHowever, there is no need to heat up magnets.


if you read his origional claim he clearly states :


" when the magnets are heated "


i read this as a claim that the process he alleges is DEPENDANT on the magnets being heated

otherwise - whe even mention it in such a otherwise sparse " explaination " ?



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 07:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by butcherguy
 





Kthanxbye
What part of wild animals don't you get. I am aware that there are zoos. Your statement early on said that humans are the only species of higher intelligence that tries to kill off or enslave every other species. THAT SIMPLY ISN'T TRUE. There are wild animals on this Earth, if you try to tell me that there are not, then I can't help you out there. Those wild animals are not enslaved, as you might tell by the definition that I provided you with. You apparently saw the word 'animals' and decided that I meant that animals can't be enslaved. Not my point at all. I was trying to let you know that most of the animals on Earth are not enslaved. Humans have never tried to enslave every other species. We humans have not caused the extinction of nearly as many species as Mother Nature has!



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 08:23 AM
link   
The gaping hole in theory that needs to be addressed before anything can come to fruition:

The amount of energy needed to create and sustain the black hole (singularity) is greater than the energy that can be harnessed from the Earth.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 09:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Damian-007
Can't he come up with something really useful like Perpetual Motion?


The boy's one step ahead of you.


Gentill says that he is working on a new Grand unification theory and perpetual motion machine.

www.ireport.com...


The article is not vetted by CNN.

Here's an explanation of iReport.


iReport is a user-generated section of CNN.com. The stories in this section are not edited, fact-checked or screened before they are posted.

What does the label "not vetted by CNN" mean?
The label “Not vetted by CNN” lets you know that this story hasn’t been both checked and cleared by a CNN editor.


www.ireport.com...



[edit on 2010/1/22 by GradyPhilpott]



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by butcherguy
 


How could we? We haven't existed for as long as nature.

But just to name a few of our fork's victims:

quagga

dodo

Yangtze river dolphin

Thylacine

Irish deer

Aurochs

Cave Lion

passenger Pigeon.

And most other megafauna.

The list is long, oh so very long.



Sorry, but when a population lives only by the will of another species' restraint, it is essentially dependent on that other species for continuation, and therefore enslaved. Now slavery simply means forcefully doing the work of another. Every species on Earth is at our whims.

Ergo, we are that bad. Sorry, but proper humanity and moral behavior is a lot younger than the human species itself. Humans existed for 150,000 years as cruel savages before modern behavior was born, and even then it was suppressed until civilization was born.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by scrybe
 


There is a little known method of faking more mass than you have, to some extent. At least that's a good way to describe it. You know how a micro black hole is relatively, and I saw relatively with a giggle, "simple" to make, as opposed to a fully functioning, fully scaled up black hole? Well there is a process to that. A super fluid, a very cold collection of molecules which forget their individual identities, acts as if it is one molecule. One molecule is a hell of a lot easier to place into a micro singularity than a bunch of them. If the molecules are negatively charged, and placed into a negatively charged container that is very very very cold, the molecule can collapse into itself and become a singularity. And of course than destroy the earth. You'd have to stabilize it right before singularity, place a negatively charged rod into its pole, and force a ring shape. That way it cannot form a stable singularity, because it cannot condense into one point. It's basically a point mass with some from of volume. A freak and contradiction to the universe.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by scrybe
 


The key process in my new experiment is absorption not compression ,absorbing to the center where it piles but keeps imploding due to the amount of matter coming into it.So in this way it becomes a singularity but a ring singularity,and as it's rotating the magnetic structures will stay the same.

[edit on 22-1-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 11:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 


hi , could you please elaborate on :

[ mankind has caused the extinction of ]" And most other megafauna."

i am not a zoo-ologist , but i assume megafauna to be species generally larger than elephants



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:19 PM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 


When humanity evolved, most species bigger than a large tiger went extinct.

this wiki page shows the species of mega fauna during man. Most were killed off either directly or indirectly from us.

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


Dear: Gentill Abdulla

To put this subject to rest, here is an open invitation. I am the lead reach Scientist of Hydro-Sun Technologies Inc. Sense you are obviously not capable of providing the facility, technical support, materials needed, machinery, staff support, Lab Equipment, or the technical know how to write the forgoing empirical information for peer review. I am offering you all of the above to prove your theory.

I have two labs to choose from, one in Reno, NV part of UNR, and the other in Northern California. I have access to all of the things listed above, to include a team of mathematicians to work out your calculations. If you truly believe your theory to be function able; then please come and prove it. I will provide all the funding necessary for the development of the prototype.

Sincerely

TheGhost

>SNIP<

P.S. I am still waiting for you to answer any of my earlier posts?

[Mod edit - Please don't post email addresses in threads]



[edit on 1/22/2010 by yeahright]



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by MolecularPhD
 


Before the English professors in the room start asking the question. My speech recognition software took the word Research for Reach. so it was suppose to read Lead Research Scientist; sorry for the typo.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by butcherguy
 


How could we? We haven't existed for as long as nature.

But just to name a few of our fork's victims:

quagga

dodo

Yangtze river dolphin

Thylacine

Irish deer

Aurochs

Cave Lion

passenger Pigeon.

And most other megafauna.

The list is long, oh so very long.



Sorry, but when a population lives only by the will of another species' restraint, it is essentially dependent on that other species for continuation, and therefore enslaved. Now slavery simply means forcefully doing the work of another. Every species on Earth is at our whims.

Ergo, we are that bad. Sorry, but proper humanity and moral behavior is a lot younger than the human species itself. Humans existed for 150,000 years as cruel savages before modern behavior was born, and even then it was suppressed until civilization was born.
Several dozen Yangtze River Dolphin still exist. As far as the Irish deer and most megafauna go, they died off in prehistoric times, making it very difficult to prove that human dietary preferences brought about their extinction. At any rate, give it another million years, we humans will most likely be extinct, along with your 'highly intelligent' crows and dolphins.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:53 PM
link   
It would work but it would require the entire mass of the universe as fuel to go back 1 minute.



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 12:58 PM
link   
Oh and by the way so you understand my interest; I do not care about traveling in time. I am interested in the Black Hole; as it would solve a problem in my own developed technology. So we would not need your 999 year old light; just the developed black hole you speak of; and I only need the the black hole to be about .0008 nm in size. So what size magnets to you envision we would need to create that size black hole? I have centrifugal magnetosphere that can produce your ring effect if that is helpful? This could be your chance at greatness; as the project I am working on is of great interest to the people of the planet earth,.

Sincerely

TheGhost



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by MolecularPhD
 


Alright I will tell you how to create a black hole ,but I will only put it on my email address. So send it to my email account. Just so you know the black hole can be any size you want.

[edit on 22-1-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]



posted on Jan, 22 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by butcherguy
 


The process of extinction is natural, and makes new species. Dinosaurs are extinct, but birds still go one. Human caused extinction is unique because no ancestors are left to carry on their traits. If humans would have caused dinosaurs to go extinct, than there would be no birds.

And there is more than one kind of extinction, the river dolphin is functionally extinct.

en.wikipedia.org...

That means that it's doomed naturally.

Ergo from all the above, humans cause massive extinctions.

Also when we find our own tools, and the markings of those tools in extinct animals, and those animals suddenly disappear from the fossil record when we appear, then it is logical to assume it was us.

on topic, molecularphd, I think I explained a ways back one way to create a black hole. it's not hard, just expensive. Creating a macro atom with superfluid, and then a macro micro black hole from that macro atom can be used to create a black hole. I have no idea, but it might just possibly generate more gravity than its own mass allows because it's basically tricking the universe.

[edit on 22-1-2010 by Gorman91]



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join