It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by clive
We only know of these WMD because the U.S keeps telling us there has been no real proof yet that Iraq still has these weapons.
Originally posted by Winston Smith
We have two issues both sides have difficulty understanding:
1) Iraq is essentially a conquered nation not living up to its terms of surrender. Hence, attack is warrented.
2) Iraq is not attacking us, nor our alies. Hence, attack is out of the question.
If we had a stronger, more respected leader in the White House, how would these issues fare? Is the debate more a function of the near-tie of the election, or the issues themselves?
Interesting thought, no?
Originally posted by joehayner I would have loved to see a better person in the executive seat fo our country, but there wasn't anything better to vote for.