With the Obama Administration doing extensive data collection on our personal communication, we decry our lose of privacy and lose of the
Constitution, but one important reason to object to this data collection/list making/total control is that it is standard operation procedure of
Communist takeover to make a list of all those people who might be troublesome for the new regime, a "to kill" list. If you doubt that this is
standard operating procedure or that this is in the works for us then you should watch a clip of Yuri Bezmenov being interviewed by G. Edward Griffin
in 1984
video.google.com...#
It is a rather long video, but well worth viewing. I found it especially interesting because of his references to East Pakistan.
Yuri Bezmenov, a KGB agent working in India apparently around 1970, stumbled upon a list of people to be killed and found that the people who were on
the list were people who were sympathetic to Russia and some were people he had worked with and liked. He was very sympathetic to India and was
outraged. He was told that people who were sympathetic to the communist cause in the early stage of takeover were eliminated in the later takeover
stage because they tended to become disillusioned when faced with the reality with the brutality of a takeover and would become bitter enemies.
Therefore they were preemptively killed off as standard operating procedure.
He then found evidence of Russian support for a communist uprising in East Pakistan, some arms and ammunitions in the Russian Embassy, crates of
weapons, labeled as literature to be shipped to Dacca University. The East Pakistanis, who considered communism to be cool and hip, were pushing for
autonomy from West Pakistan and in the national election won an overall majority of the seats in the new National Assembly. They were sympathetic to
the communists, but the communist organization there did not participate in the election. The Awami League took almost every seat in the National
Assembly for their province, but none from the rest of Pakistan but still had a majority due mostly to the size of the population and would have run
the whole country if they had been allowed to take office. Sheik Mujibur Rahman, the leader of the Awami League, was not planning on independence, but
hoping for enough autonomy to reverse the financial and social degradation the province had been experiencing under West Pakistani rule and was using
threats of independence to get a better bargaining position from General Yahya and Bhutto. Everybody knew that they weren't going to hand over power
to him. Their response was to extend the negotiating time to bring in troops, by plane in Dacca and by ship in Chittagong and then suddenly struck
and massacred huge numbers of people, I don't claim to be an expert, but I was there then.and witnessed the Pak army going door to door killing
families.
Bezmenov was upset enough to defect and to warn the US about the possible communist insurrection in East Pakistan. He was debriefed by the CIA and I
will make a bet, connecting dots, that information prodded them into pushing the Pakistanis into that big massacre as a solution to the problem of
there being too many voters in the province.This is about the beginning time of the US presence in Pakistan, drug smuggling from Afghanistan, and
terror strikes and bombings in India, these are from the CIA trained Pakistan Intelligence, and even the connection between 911 "terrorists" to
Pakistan Intelligence ties in
Ok that was my tangent. back to topic.
In another place on the video Bezmenov offers the example of a communist takeover in a section of Vietnam during the Vietnam war in which the
Americans were amazed at how the communists could kill so many of their possible opposition in such short order. They controlled the region for two
days only and knew exactly who to kill. His claim is that the intelligence had been gathered for a long time ahead about who was pro American and who
was not, and when they took over, in a single night killed off the opposition.
You think I am full of it, I don't care. Troll away you trolls, put me down on your murder list you b...s
This preemptive kill off might ring a bell because the US congress March 13, 2008 was told in a not so secret meeting that the DHS had plans to
preemptively round up potential opponents because of an upcoming financial crisis and social breakdown. Why did Senator Judd get all teary eyed when
refusing to participate in the census operation as Secretary of Commerce?
[edit on 18-1-2010 by m khan]
I hope my going off on a tangent has not made this confusing, the murders committed by the Pak Army imho at the direction and with the advice of the
CIA, (it is estimated a total of three million people!) were their response to the threat of a communist uprising. But the theme of my thread is that
it is standard opeerating procedure for the communists to murder everybody that might oppose them based on an extensive list, like the data on us
collected by the DHS. That Obama is a communist or solicalist and ascribes to the Fabian school of socialism in which their symbol is a wolf in sheeps
clothing, and deception being a tool of theirs, is assumed.
[edit on 18-1-2010 by m khan]
[edit on 18-1-2010 by m khan]
[edit on 18-1-2010 by m khan]
[edit on 18-1-2010 by m khan]