It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dark Matter/Energy and Consciousness.

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 09:20 PM
link   
Do we really know what Dark Energy is? The answer is no. We can only see its gravitational effects but nothing else. I found this on the internet and found it very interesting tell me what you think.

noeticcenter.tripod.com...

Heres a small quote from the article.



Wave function collapse is universal, but complex mental phenomena are unique to humans. So, the mental world must have sources other than wave function collapse. Jung and Pauli (See Meier, 1992) suggested a thought-field with its own elementary particles. Since thoughts are invisible any such field and particles must also be imperceptible. It must be a hidden physical field parallel to that of the ordinary material realm. The dark matter realm may fill the bill.


If any of you have the time to read through all this, I highly recommend it.




posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 09:53 PM
link   
I personally believe that there are seven-hundred dimensions of the mind that allow us to see the ultimate three dimensional shapes, over a four dimensional time period.

[edit on 17-1-2010 by SpiritHipHop]



posted on Jan, 18 2010 @ 12:23 AM
link   
does nobody else have an opinion on this matter?



posted on Jan, 18 2010 @ 12:27 AM
link   
Yeah he's proposing the typical "resonance" model of reality but he's just falling back on fancy physic theories which are just strapped on numerology dildos.... umm. But then I do have my own resonance model of reality naturalresonancerevolution.blogspot.com... You got to expose the logic behind the math of resonance to get at this stuff.


reply to post by SpiritHipHop
 



posted on Jan, 18 2010 @ 12:31 AM
link   
reply to post by drew hempel
 


you never have to expose logic behind theories.



posted on Jan, 18 2010 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Here you go -- a maverick physicist who challenges the LOGIC of astronomical theories:

www.jmccanneyscience.com...

A SIMPLE LOGICAL TAUTOLOGY EXPLAINS THIS LIVING OXY-MORON ...

Astronomers in their haste and anxiety 50 years ago (and prior to sending out any space probes) decided on four Axioms of Astronomy

1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos

2) incorrect axiom #2 states that the solar system began all at one time 4.5 billion years ago

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls

4) incorrect axiom #4 states that the cause of galactic red shifts is due to movement (they failed to realize there is another source of red shift ... the induced electric dipole red shift) and they incorrectly concluded that the universe must be expanding

SO HERE WE ARE 50 YEARS LATER AND EVERY PH.D. AWARDED IN THOSE YEARS HAS LEARNED AND HERALDED THESE INCORRECT CONCEPTS (THOSE WHO DISAGREED DID NOT GET A PH.D.) SO IS IT ANY WONDER THEY ALL AGREE?? ... AS CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION CAME IN ONE PIECE AT A TIME THEY CONTINUED TO PUT BAND-AIDS ON THE AXIOMS OR DISCARDED THE DATA ... THE HEAVY HANDED ARROGANT ASTRONOMERS FORCED THIS DOGMA DOWN ONTO ALL OTHER FIELDS TO STEP IN LINE ... AND THIS IS HANDED OFF TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH TEXTBOOKS, NEWS PAPERS, MAGAZINES, TV, THE EVENING NEWS AND ON AND ON ...


A SIMPLE LOGICAL TAUTOLOGY EXPLAINS THIS LIVING OXY-MORON ... Astronomers in their haste and anxiety 50 years ago (and prior to sending out any space probes) decided on four Axioms of Astronomy 1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos 2) incorrect axiom #2 states that the solar system began all at one time 4.5 billion years ago 3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls 4) incorrect axiom #4 states that the cause of galactic red shifts is due to movement (they failed to realize there is another source of red shift ... the induced electric dipole red shift) and they incorrectly concluded that the universe must be expanding SO HERE WE ARE 50 YEARS LATER AND EVERY PH.D. AWARDED IN THOSE YEARS HAS LEARNED AND HERALDED THESE INCORRECT CONCEPTS (THOSE WHO DISAGREED DID NOT GET A PH.D.) SO IS IT ANY WONDER THEY ALL AGREE?? ... AS CONTRADICTORY INFORMATION CAME IN ONE PIECE AT A TIME THEY CONTINUED TO PUT BAND-AIDS ON THE AXIOMS OR DISCARDED THE DATA ... THE HEAVY HANDED ARROGANT ASTRONOMERS FORCED THIS DOGMA DOWN ONTO ALL OTHER FIELDS TO STEP IN LINE ... AND THIS IS HANDED OFF TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH TEXTBOOKS, NEWS PAPERS, MAGAZINES, TV, THE EVENING NEWS AND ON AND ON ...



[edit on 18-1-2010 by drew hempel]

[edit on 18-1-2010 by drew hempel]



new topics

top topics
 
3

log in

join