Middle East on fire, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 144 times


reply posted on 22-1-2010 @ 09:23 PM by john124
reply to post by Vitchilo



This could be BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG... if true...


Don't get tooooooooooo excited, hope for the besssssssssssssssstttt!


reply posted on 22-1-2010 @ 11:21 PM by Vitchilo
Here are the last reports:

Clinton’s warning to Iran prompts Syria, Hezbollah to go on high alert

According to analysts , Clinton hinted in the press conference that the US has enough international support to act against the Iranian nuclear facilities just like it did in 1991 ( Gulf War) against Saddam Hussein following his occupation of Kuwait.

She said that Iran had a ‘clear choice’ between isolation and ‘living up to its international obligations’ and added ‘it is important to send [the] message to the Iranian leadership, that the world will act, and the world will act together.’

French FM Bernard Kouchner said Thursday during his meeting with Lebanese P Saad Hariri “: If there was a threat to Lebanon, it will only come from a military adventure carried out by Hezbollah in the best interest of Iran”

So France is saying no attack is planned...

Hezbollah's relocation of rocket sites to Lebanon's interior poses wider threat

BEIRUT -- Hezbollah has dispersed its long-range-rocket sites deep into northern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley, a move that analysts say threatens to broaden any future conflict between the Islamist movement and Israel into a war between the two countries.

A worrying quote by a former general..
There is no reason the current calm cannot continue, said retired Maj. Gen. Giora Eiland, a former Israeli national security adviser who is now a senior researcher at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies.

But if a conflict does break out, "Israel will not contain that war against Hezbollah," Eiland said. "We cannot."

Given Hezbollah's capabilities, he said, "the only way to deter the other side and prevent the next round -- or if it happens, to win -- is to have a military confrontation with the state of Lebanon."




reply posted on 23-1-2010 @ 01:30 AM by mmiichael
Maybe too complex for here - there is much more going on than Cowboys and Indians aka Israel vs Arabs.

Syria is extremely uncomfortable with hosting Hezbollah for it's master Iran. Hezbollah and Iran might even represent a threat to Assad's fragile grip of the country.

Discord within the rank and file there is a move to replace leadership with Sheikh Subhi al-Tufaili Hezbollah’s leader 1989 to 1991, expelled in 1998 after rebelling over the strengthening alliance with Iran and the decision to integrate Hezbollah into Lebanon’s political landscape.

Iran is terrified of direct confrontations with anyone capable of besting them in open military conflict. Hezbollah has been used as their mercenary proxy. But they don't want to go to battle for Iran any more.

This may be part of a domino effect as Iran's own military has balked at a war the Ayatollahs and Mr A push for to somehow resuscitate their positions.

It's all been a war of nerves to see who blinks first.

We'll see how this plays out.

www.stratfor.com...

Fissures are already widening in Hezbollah over the group’s relationship with Iran. The more dovish faction led by Secretary-General Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah has been extremely wary of Hezbollah bearing the brunt of the blowback in Iran’s escalating conflict with Israel and the United States.

But more hawkish figures like Nasrallah’s deputy, Sheikh Naim Qassem, have remained more tightly aligned with Tehran. Syria is watching developments in the region and monitoring the potential for another military conflict between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon either in the lead-up to or aftermath of a potential military strike against Iran. Syria has no interest in getting embroiled in such a conflict, but it does see an opportunity on the horizon as these rifts within Hezbollah continue to widen.



reply posted on 23-1-2010 @ 03:25 AM by Vitchilo
Yeah it's sure is complicated...

Other news...

From Lebanon

10:15am Minister Ghazi Aridi to Future News TV: The circumstances today resemble those prior to the Israeli invasion in 1982 and everyone has to work for enhancing national unity and preparing the ground to face any Israeli aggression.



reply posted on 23-1-2010 @ 03:50 AM by Vitchilo
reply to post by Misoir



Thanks a lot for this new piece of information... As you said, there's really something brewing there or Sarkozy wouldn't have made those comments...

But his pledge to protect Lebanon from Israeli attack is a joke... since Sarko is a HUGE, a HUGE zionist.

Hopefully the UNIFIL will shoot down Israeli aircraft if they start bombing Lebanon.

Then Israel will have two choices. Bomb UNIFIL...make the entire world their enemy... or stop their invasion campaign...

Or more unlikely but possible, UNIFIL will side with Israel and go to war with Hezbollah...

[edit on 23-1-2010 by Vitchilo]


reply posted on 23-1-2010 @ 03:55 AM by Misoir
reply to post by Vitchilo



Yes that would be good for the people of Lebanon but I am very affraid of what would happen if UNIFIL did that. If anything would cause a huge escelation on a global scale it would be that.

Or UNIFIL just won't get involved and will leave it to the state of Lebanon to handle their on issues.

[edit on 23-1-2010 by Misoir]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Young Israelis and Palestinians Flash Mob for Peace
  Posted 7 days ago with 37 member flags
Zionists , Stop the War Against Iran Now!
  Posted 6 days ago with 34 member flags
Zionist regime well within Iran missile reach: MP
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
Israel no match for Iran military might
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
Iran to announce "very important" nuclear achievements
  Posted 2 days ago with 21 member flags