It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

911 Commission Senior Counsel: Report is a lie

page: 1
68
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+38 more 
posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 10:27 PM
link   
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com

SOURCE: SALEM NEWS

John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

Admission from the senior counsel of the 911 Commission (OS) that it's a lie

(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”

The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say... “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth. . . " When Bush's own handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?

9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, "No one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone who wants to make certain this never happens again."

With the only "official" 9/11 report now totally false, where do we go from here? Who is hurt by these lies? The families of the victims of 9/11 have fought, for years, to get to the truth. For years, our government has hidden behind lies and secrecy to deny them closure.


In 2006, The Washington Post reported..."Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission..."

What does Farmer's book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide.

Farmer never tells us what. Nobody could keep a job in the public sector speaking out more than Farmer has. What were Farmer's omissions? There are some. Now that we know that intelligence given the 9/11 Commission wasn't just lies from our own government but based on testimony coerced through torture from informants forced to back up a cover story now proven false, a pattern emerges.

We know that, immediately after 9/11, many more potential suspects and informants were flown directly to Saudi Arabia by Presidential order than were ever detained and questioned. We will never know what they could have said. Their testimony would have been vital to any real investigation were they not put beyond the reach of even Congress and the FBI.

Putting aside all other questions of recent evidence of CIA involvement with bin Laden prior to 9/11 or altered physical evidence involving the Pentagon attack, any failure to call to account the systematic perjury committed by dozens of top government officials, now exposed as a certainty is an offense to every American.

What do we know? We know the conjecture about 9/11 still stands but for certain, we know we were lied to, not in a minor way, but systematically as part of a plot covering up government involvement at nearly every level, perhaps gross negligence, perhaps something with darker intent.

Are we willing to live with another lie to go with the Warren Report, Iran Contra and so many others? Has the sacrifice of thousands more Americans, killed, wounded or irreparably damaged by a war knowingly built on the same lies from the same liars who misled the 9/11 Commission pushed us beyond willingness to confront the truth?

Have we yet found where the lies have begun and ended? There is no evidence of this, only evidence to the contrary. The lies live on and the truth will never be sought. The courage for that task has not been found.

Can anyone call themselves an American if they don't demand, even with the last drop of their blood, that the truth be found?


added source

[edit on 15-1-2010 by mikelee]

[edit on 15-1-2010 by mikelee]

[edit on 15-1-2010 by mikelee]



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 10:42 PM
link   
John Farmer, during radio interview




JF: Well, let me just say that I think the report is, uh, extremely accurate, and- and sets forth the facts of 9/11.


www.bradblog.com...


Now, isn't this interesting...the OP claims that John Farmer says the report is a lie....and yet, when you look for Mr. Farmer's actual words, you find interviews of him saying that the report is extremely accurate.......



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
I would love for this to be true OP, but please provide some links? maybe some other sources then word of mouth?

Edit:

There is now a source, so will be reading it and will post after I check it out. Thanks much for the quick editing for the source. This could be potentially huge if the media decides to cover it.

[edit on 1/16/2010 by deadline527]


+5 more 
posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


Your entire OS defense is now debunked. Not by me, but by the Senior Counsel of the 911 Commission.


[edit on 15-1-2010 by mikelee]



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by deadline527
 


Source? The man's book speaks for it's self. Below is his book.

John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″

Source: Salem News





[edit on 15-1-2010 by mikelee]



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:12 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


Not quite ripe yet...


Okay, your thread says that John Farmer states the report is a lie. And Mr Farmer, himself, has stated numerous times that he believes the report is accurate.


So, what does the T&C state about willingly lying?



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:14 PM
link   



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:15 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


You should actually read the book. Mr Farmer believes that it was Al Qaeda that attacked us that day. No CIA led conspiracy, no George Bush/Dick Cheney led conspiracy.....



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 

www.washingtonpost.com...

An interesting read ,


"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was

described" John Farmer

[edit on 15-1-2010 by Sean48]



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:17 PM
link   
reply to post by mikelee
 


Thank you for confirming that you have absolutely no interest in the truth. Enjoy the sand.



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Sean48
 


For me, there isn't any more debate that the OS is a lie. Everything else is just a peice of debris on the highway. Simple as that.

Now, the real investigation needs to begin.



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


On the FAA and NORAD Tapes

John Farmer " The tapes told a radically different story from what had been

told to us and the public for 2 years ....This is not spin. This is not true." www.washingtonpost.com...



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:38 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by mikelee
 


Thank you for confirming that you have absolutely no interest in the truth. Enjoy the sand.


"We to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us," said

Thomas H Kean, The former New Jersey Governor , who LED the commission.

" It was just SO FAR from the truth.. It's one of those loose ends that

never got tied." www.washingtonpost.com...



posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Sean48
 


Read Mr Farmer's book. He clearly states that he believes the "dishonesty" on the part of NORAD, FAA, DoD wasnt to cover up an inside job, but it was to cover up just how inept and unprepared those agencies were that day.



posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:04 AM
link   
this is old news

but flagged


+6 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:18 AM
link   
The 911 Commission Report was a bag job from Day One. It has zero investigative merit and is basically a narrative which is short on facts and long on irrelevant issues and unproven conclusions. Even Thomas Kean stated the Commission was set up to fail. Anyone who refers you to the 911 Commission Report for accurate information about 9/11 is really not playing with a full deck.

1. Commission set up in late November of 2002, a full 14 months after the alleged attacks. Why the rush? Looks like somebody did a good job of stonewalling the setting up of the commission.

2. Henry Kissinger is named as original head of 9/11 Commission by Bush. He wouldn't last long at the post, being forced to resign after the 9/11 victims had reservations about a conflict of interest with regards to Kissinger's personal financial matters. Not too difficult to connect the dots here to see where this appointment was heading.

3. Commission is underfunded; it does not have powers to force key witnesses to testify in public and is exactly what it was intended to be, a paper tiger.

The 9/11 Commission was more than just a cover job, it was a major test to see if the United States of America still had the essential separation of powers, a cornerstone of the Constitution. Unfortunately, the nation failed miserably at this test, leaving the door wide open for additional abuses of power, which at one time were thought to be Un-American.

[edit on 16-1-2010 by SphinxMontreal]



posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:33 AM
link   
9/11 is and was a inside job

blame it on the CIA,NSA,NAVY,AIR FORCE,CNN,FOX NEWS


next big event will be a nuke in DC so the gov can fight some more wars



posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:39 AM
link   
I think in the back of our minds we all knew the official 9/11 report was total BS. Good to see someone confirm that.



posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
Good to see someone confirm that.


Pity that the Senior Counsel never confirmed that at all, try reading the thread to see exactly what he thought!.

This is typical of the "truther" approach, take some information and distort it to fit their agenda, all the time ignoring the actual facts!




top topics



 
68
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join