Proof of alien time travel, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-1-2010 @ 05:00 PM by hoghead cheese
Originally posted by seethelight
reply to
post by HolgerTheDane



Sorry you locked up your granny in a home that killed her.


I no kidding, I'm also sorry you locked her up in a home. Of course it could be an easier explanation. Since we all know how well you get treated in an old folks or assissted living complex (more money means better treatment), it entirely possible that the nurses didn't see her for a few hours and wanted to cover their buts because they made a grave error. And told the doctor that it was a 10 to 20 minutes and even though he doesn't believe them was afraid of being caught up in the issue and agreed with them (if it's wrong he could say well thats what they told me I wasn't their). Remember, dead men and women tell know tales.


reply posted on 16-1-2010 @ 01:52 AM by HolgerTheDane
Thank you to those who posted and especially to those who tried to be "fact-seeking".

As you all probably know there is no doubt as to the obvious conclusion, but as an experiment it served it's purpose for the discussion we (some friends and I) are to have where we shall discuss urban legends, abduction cases and in particular the so called proof of alien presence on earth.

What is fascinating about this thread and others are that we have a huge number of people who are willing to believe (obsternately so), that a film of a first stage separation from a rocket launch is proof of ufo's entering a wormhole or even another dimension.

We have people who believe a dead body is alien mutilation ONLY because some very dubious (unsubstantiated) science has been presented on an official ufo website.

We have people who see a film of balloons released from a festival and promptly declare it ufo's formation flying.

You are all right to call my story a non-ufo, non-alien event, but given the number of very doubtful evidence in so many other threads, I find it odd that my story is moved to the gray area, and others remain where they started.

I'm interested in where my story differs from the "true" abduction cases - other than in my story I am the one who claim it happened and in other stories the abductee came with the claim, BUT the amount of evidence is basically the same.

I'm interested in the reason why some stories are swallowed hook, line and sinker on hearsay and others are swamped with demand for emperical proof.

Perhaps my story was too easy to investigate? Should I have related it in third person - "I came across this story...?" Would the name of the doctor MD had made a difference (dr. Anton Rasmussen)?

Anyway - I'll explore more about this and eventually come up with a thesis and I'll spare you another "test-thread" to explore this further.
Or will I?



I'll tell you this...
When my story ends up on a MUFON conference you'll know where it came from.
And that it is in fact true

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Something truly wondrous is going on.
  Posted 12 days ago with 67 member flags
PAYPAL - Judge, Jury and Executioner (the conclusion)
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
I Met a Marine Corp Captain Today
  Posted 12 days ago with 17 member flags
Fascinating Dream... I Think
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags