posted on Jan, 16 2010 @ 04:13 AM
We have to pick someone who already is on the inside and hope and believe and give support that they can accomplish the new agenda.
The new agenda of the party is exactly to fix these problems as outlined in the grievances.
The two parties have to be split and a new one developed for the people.
If this individual does not create or foster leadership they will be replaced. This person would provide a beach head to make inroads.
The unemployed, the ones in debt, the ones losing their houses, the ones in jail and coming out of jail have to be sought. In other words we have to
grab everyone who has nothing and go up.
Along with addressing the grievances. We demand action and solidarity. We are prepared to hang, fight and die if need be.
In mass, each member of the party, would refuse to pay federal and state tax. We would have to coalesce into a group that gives, provides food,
shelter, and security.
If need be, areas, states would be designated HQ's or disbursing centers. Money would have to donated, we would enrich the populace where the states
and federal government have failed. Engender the populace.
All individuals working on behalf of said political party would only be provided at maximum: food, shelter and security. Income is to the party and
"potential new members, until a new economic model is created. One for the party might be based on trade of services or goods as needed.
Food farms, security training facilities, managerial and administration training would have to be provided.
Sure a certain % of each is needed and as personal inclination provides, free choice would prevail to a point. New recruits might find themselves on
the food farm or security training but ... each and every individual has a full vote on party policies.
People would be strictly rotated out from administration, to food, to shelter creating a truly multifaceted face of the individual.
A 3-5-7 year plan needs to be addressed. Eventually, at some point, once grievances are fixed the party would restructure as global and domestic
Priorities are to address the grievances. Once grievances are met, party and domestic life would return to a somewhat "new" and original
Bill of Rights, US Constitution would be the basis from which the grievances could be addressed.
One of the initial goals is to creat a 2nd Bill of Rights which would specifically address and make law to fix the grievances.
The party, this new party would work within the system and specifically if able make laws to address: taxes, corporations, role of federal government,
jobs, health care, and education, lobbyists, wall street.
For example: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights
The Second Bill of Rights was a proposal made by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt during his State of the Union Address on January 11,
1944 to suggest that the nation had come to recognize, and should now implement, a second bill of rights. Roosevelt did not argue for any change to
the United States Constitution; he argued that the second bill of rights was to be implemented politically, not by federal judges. Roosevelt's stated
justification was that the "political rights" guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights had "proved inadequate to assure us equality in
the pursuit of happiness." Roosevelt's remedy was to create an "economic bill of rights" which would guarantee:
* A job with a living wage
* Freedom from unfair competition and monopolies
* A home
* Medical care
If said new political party is not allowed to develop, if said members are labeled domestic terrorist, harassed, in anyway then of course we are being
told we cannot as the people do that which our founding fathers said one day we might have to do.
That does not leave many options. If said party is not able to gather enough support of the people for whatever reason then said members have to be
prepared to create zones, areas of control.
It will be truly give me liberty or give me death.
The party in its infancy has to create the 2nd Bill of Rights addressing the wrongs of the day. Elect officials. Create zones of influence and
control. Create a body from which the others can see the repercussions. Through this we get more members as they see our vigilance and dedication.
As the party musters support and strength we gain a stronger voice. We act within the system, within the law. As the economy falls we stand ready to
sweep up the displaced masses.
Party attaches to willing political figures already in the system.
Those who have stood fast outside the two main parties.
We give support.
We demand 2nd Bill of Rights.
We demand action on the grievances.
We vote within the party.
We act accordingly.
Said individuals within the system get the collective power of the new party. Some of this perhaps is already in place.
You would need at least 1,500 people willing to work 40-80 hours a week, with a goal of trying to start somewhere around 50-100 of the House and 2-4
Senators at first.
The party forms first.
The 2nd Bill of Rights is written.
Individuals within the system are questioned and if they agree they get our support.
Each member of the party votes.
The new party tries to create a political shift where by more than half the senators are in the new party and more than half of the House are also.
They start to create new laws addressing the grievances.
We try to allow the political process to work.
Lobbyists, corporations, banks are all cut out of the new party. Only members of the party can vote on party matters. The consensus once reached is
acted out of the new party.
All party members only serve 1 term in the Senate and/or 1 term in the House.
Some might say this sounds, communistic, or socialist, actually its very democratic and a necessity.
The main goal is to strip the federal government, banks, finance systems, insurance, and pharmaceuticals of its power.
The goals are obvious, stop wars, address the grievances, create lawful measures to prevent us from falling back to where we are now.
Once a new level playing ground is created, and close to 65-75% of the population is or counted as active members measures will have been created to
allow a more harmonious society.
Can any of this happen? Only if a framework is created to reap the masses of disenfranchised and unite their voice.
Timing and patience will be the markers.
Timing: Unemployment goes up, food prices go up, government blatantly ignores the people and continues stupid obvious mistakes governed by greed and
Perhaps there is already a political party in place that is doing some of this?
Imagine 1000 fortified compounds around the US working in unison.
Patience: Is it possible? If they start another war, if they in act martial law, if they in act conscription and if unemployment continues to climb,
the people might be made ready once they have nothing to lose.
If the federal government starts imprisoning, killing, labeling as domestic terrorists members of the said party well then that changes the
What would give credence to said party is if they all together stated and started doing 10 things.
1) stopped paying taxes "this would be recognized as a show of political discontent"
2) soldiers refused deployment
3) People stop following the law of the land in regard to the federal government
4) In essence these founding fathers and mothers would have to explicitly state,
"Until these grievances are met, until our party is recognized, until we have a voice we will refuse to participate in the law of the land."
These founding fathers and mothers would have to be prepared to be jailed, hung, shot and burned.
That is where the security comes in to play. A 1000 wacos would chill the world and show the true face of US tyranny. "It eats its own."
Now the real question is are there any political figures already in the system we could form behind?
Is there in this great country of 300 million, One thousand five hundred willing to die.
Part of the grievances would declare some as treasonous to the state and would be declared "wanted" for criminal investigation.
This party would enact through the courts, lawful charges on current and past members of the federal government.
Radio, talk shows, and a audience with foreign states would be sought through the party.
If none of this works you will find three options.
1) Become a slave.
2) Be one of those who manages the slaves.
3) Become a Iraqi living in Iraq, or a Afghan fighting Russia or USA
For a decent model of how to survive if peaceful does not work. We should study how the Iraq population has organized their neighborhoods and well as
Peaceful means first, working within the system first. If that fails it will be obvious and that only leaves being labeled a domestic terrorist or
I will now quote "FortAnthem" for I think it is the basis and beginning:
"Our forefathers petitioned the English govt for years seeking redress for their grievances. By diong this, they got their case out before the
public, the English govt and the world.
By the time it came to violent conflict, the world had been put on notice regarding the grievances of the patriots, thus making it harder for the
English to paint the colonists as terrorists.
We need to pursue every avenue of peaceful discourse before escelating to massive protests and (hopefully not necessary) violent conflict.
The colonists only fought back after the English marched to disarm the militias at Lexington and Concord. If blood must be shed, it should be clear
that the Govt fired the 1st shot. If we start the shooting war we'll be branded as terrorists and radicals. If the govt shoots 1st we can claim self
By making our case public we create understanding of our cause so that, if the day comes when armed conflict becomes necessary, we might be able to
rally others to the justness of our cause. Once the shooting war begins TPTB will cut off our access to the MSM.
We need to get our message out now."
And I quote "Chett" who also posted in this thread and offers a peaceful beginning.
"There is plenty that can be done before the guns come out. We need the majority of the people to get behind things.
1. take all your money out of banks
2. a national general strike
3. A pots and pans protest (Iceland did a great job with this one)
4. Buying boycotts
5. recalls (wherever local laws have a method)
I am sure there are more but it is a start."