It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ha`la`tha
reply to post by Psychoses
*THAT* is very interesting.
That eye of yours... works well !
Originally posted by SerialLurker
reply to post by Evasius
The image probably doesn't appear to be a spiral as this looks like it's only a still from video footage - a fraction of a second - not a timelapse photograph like the Norway spiral.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by Warrior of Light
Unexplained weather events are not uncommon during periods of techtonic stress , also worth noting that in the example you provide from China, the air quality may have something to do with the appearance of those clouds. As you are no doubt aware chemicals in the atmosphere can cause different light refractions, and therefore different hues in clouds. Worth keeping in mind that in China, you have to look good and hard to find a clean patch of air bigger than a motor car lol.
Originally posted by Psychoses
You come to ATS to sniff out story ideas, then go and write up some half thought out misleading propaganda and then come back to ATS to use the same story to back up your "views"(not to mention gaining a valuable back link for search engine indexing), all the while failing to disclose to the members of ATS that you are in fact the author of the article you are referencing.
... Very misleading on your part Jim!
Originally posted by Warrior of Light
I have yet to see ANY video footage of ANY missile/rocket behaving like the people in Norway and China have described. Do you know of any videos which would constitute evidence of how missiles are capable of these phenomena?
Originally posted by Warrior of Light
Fine, rockets were launched. That doesn't mean that those same rockets created the phenomena. For all you know, the rockets had absolutely NO correlation to the phenomena. You're simply believing, and agreeing with, the explanation put forward by the government/military. I'm looking for a plausible explanation, and if that happens to be the rocket explanation, then great. At this point, I still feel that the government/military is lying and giving us a BS excuse. But I can assure you, my mind most certainly isn't closed. A closed minded person would probably buy into the official story, and post comments that promote the notion that we should all "move along", because "there's nothing to see here." I'm all for discussion.
Originally posted by ChineseGuy
according to the explanation issued by authority, these were missile experiments.
Originally posted by Psychoses
When mainstream media writers turn up to lace threads with government explanations it only lends more weight to the theory that things are not as they seem.
ATS is a wonderful resource for fresh info, fresh ideas, and solid, candid debates -- but many folks just seem to use it to reenforce their own pre-existing biases.
Probably because it WAS over Russia -- or over international waters off the northern coast of Russia.
NEVER over Norway.
NEVER over Finland.
NEVER over your apartment, so you can put the tinfoil hat away.
but many folks just seem to use it to reenforce their own pre-existing biases.