Credible Terrorism Threats, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 14-1-2010 @ 06:44 AM by JJay55
This thread is to report credible AQ terrorism threats for the purpose of information and preparation.
Please keep on topic.

www.cnn.com...
"Washington (CNN) -- The United States is closely monitoring a "credible threat" from al Qaeda in Yemen against the U.S. homeland, two senior officials told CNN."


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 07:13 AM by JJay55
reply to post by endisnighe


Great, first post goes off topic. Crikey.
If you want to flame people go to another thread. If you don't want to take credible threats seriously, go to another thread. Thanks.



reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 07:59 AM by franspeakfree
reply to post by JJay55



Really you need to contact the white house and downing street as thats where the terrorist threats have been coming from lately.

As for AQ = AL QUAEDA

The basic truth is that Al Qaeda does not exist and never has. Al Qaeda is a manufactured enemy who was created by the Bush Administration in order to have an excuse to wage a war for the control of the world’s oil resources.


Another Bull# piece of propaganda by the CFR

Al Qaeda does not exist and never has


[edit on 14-1-2010 by franspeakfree]


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 08:24 AM by JJay55
reply to post by franspeakfree


AQ is spelled al Qaeda. If you don't believe they exist please travel to Pakistan.
If you would like to flame and not add anything to this thread... there are plenty of other threads you can attend. Thanks.


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 09:48 AM by endisnighe
Wow, check this one out.

Credible threats and the quote-



January 12, 2010
Benefits of a Near Disaster
Author: Marisa L. Porges, International Affairs Fellow in Residence Op-Ed Philadelphia Inquirer

Marisa L. Porges states, "the attempted Christmas attack has inadvertently helped the United States on multiple national security fronts."


From the link-
CFR-Americas

Sorry, when you have people linked with CFR mixed in with the media, and their stated purposes to install MORE security where there was NO problem.

Kind of makes me go, hmmmmm. I wonder what other security measures are necessary? Maybe next we can install x-ray machines with the next cluster**** mistake by the government. MMMMMkk.

I am not a cow and I will not fall for the fear mongering that is the whole purpose of this.

Create or allow problem, then institute said fixes(controls).


THE ENEMY? Yes, a bunch of religious nutcases in some podunk area of the globe is going to scare me?

You know what scares me more, the globalization of government and the lack of my fellow citizens not realizing the Fact that our country is no longer a sovereign nation.

Globalize much?

How about addressing the PROBLEM not the side effects. This whole terrorism bullcrap is just the same as trying to cure a disease.

You address the disease, not a symptom. It is quite relevant to the discussion here on credible threats.

How about this for credible threat-

The next attack will remove MORE freedoms and make us more into cattle.




reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 09:59 AM by JJay55
reply to post by endisnighe



Kindly move to a thread that is more appropriate for you.
Thanks.


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 10:30 AM by Cuhail
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to
post by endisnighe



Kindly move to a thread that is more appropriate for you.
Thanks.


If only you had the control to decide who posts in your thread. Maybe someday, right? In the meantime, try debating and discussing the issues you have brought to the table and do try to keep up without dismissing those who hold a different viewpoint. Debate the topic, not the poster.

Cuhail



reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 10:47 AM by JJay55
Originally posted by Cuhail
Originally posted by JJay55
reply to
post by endisnighe



Kindly move to a thread that is more appropriate for you.
Thanks.


If only you had the control to decide who posts in your thread. Maybe someday, right? In the meantime, try debating and discussing the issues you have brought to the table and do try to keep up without dismissing those who hold a different viewpoint. Debate the topic, not the poster.

Cuhail

No thank you. Your avatar shows the stubborn attitude so no need for a one sided discussion.
Meanwhile I'm sure you can find other threads with plenty of people who would love to discuss your views.
Good luck to you.


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 10:51 AM by Cuhail
reply to post by JJay55



So, does trying to dismiss people from "your" thread EVER work???

Why does only YOUR opinion matter? Why would you even post a topic if you didn't want to discuss the topic you posted on?

Make your post count man! Bring the TOPIC forward, not your agenda.

Cuhail


reply posted on 14-1-2010 @ 10:53 AM by Bunker or Bust
reply to post by JJay55



Yeah lets talk about credible threats, should one exist you will destroy the chances of the security services actually stopping it. Spooked bad guys change plans at the last minute..

If you have knowledge of a threat then someone should come pick you up for a little chat.. Only someone involved would know, it's not like they publish a schedule...

Pointless fear inducing thread
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 5 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags