posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 01:44 AM
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
You know, I'm trying to glean hidden motives behind the dissemination of such a document, or knowingly hiring the guy who wrote it ...
Whether or not it was the driving force behind it, one must consider the potentially significant psy-ops parameters/elements. Namely that the
more effective way to attack the CT community is to sit back, plant a story like this, and let our natural suspicion pit us against each other in a
cataclysm of mistrust. It is a lot easier to do than take the time and effort to infiltrate thousands of forums and blogs. Just hang back and watch
us go at each other's throats believing that every one who disagrees must now be a government shill.
It's already happening on this thread a little.
Like I said ... it's something to consider.
It’s kind of like a shotgun article that can kill two or more birds with one stone.
First you have the intimidation factor. We know a lot of people here on ATS are just lurkers who for various professional and social and familiar
reasons are reluctant to post.
On the rare occasion that they might them knowing something like this could keep them right out of the water.
Then you have the divide and conquer factor as you mention. Paranoia strikes deep! Into you mind it will creep!
Who is really a government disinformation agent and who is really just taking an opposing view on one issue but then sides with you on the next, and
now you are suspicious as to why they are siding with you on it!
Then finally what he wants to do is introduce legislation that can lead to litigation. Defamed politicians and corporate moguls and celebrities and
even you and I if we are slandered could sue the hosting site and the posters that do.
You get the law passed, and then stack the Supreme Court with people like him?
It’s always about control and money; there is no purpose in taking the time to exert the control if there is not a direct profit to be had through
that administration. The control can have multipurpose but you at least want to cover your costs.