Sunspot 1040 and the Haitian Earthquake

page: 6
128
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Interesting hypothesis. There do seem to be some differences between the Sunspot and the map however.
The way they curve for one. One goes up, the other goes down. Does this mean the Sun is reshapeing the surface of the Earth?
I am not making fun of you, I only want to know what you are thinking. You mention of man's proclivity for seeing shapes in nature tells me you are not a scatterbrain.




posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Hi I am new to ATS
the earth quakes, tseunamis, katrinas... etc etc does this all not wreak of HAARP and NWO !!!



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:38 PM
link   
reply to post by JAG777
 


Possible, however there is little to go on.
Other than HAARP can indeed be used as a weapon, but why Haiti?



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Ratkiller
 


Haiti has always been the home of voodoo and black magic so far as we know in the last few generations. the catholic church/jesuits abhor them because they cannot control them. Haitians are heavily concentrated in New Orleans and southern parts of america, HAARP caused katrina to hit that part and hence the US forces took 5 days to help them, so as many as possible would die.
They also use HAARP to cause many other world disasters and threaten the countries to fall inline with the NWO and to also allow them to control their economy hence this one world currency very soon coming into play.



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 06:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Evasius
 


Intersting observation and correlation. If I had to pull a guess out m' ass I would say this is more a consciousness manifestation then a "cause" as some might speculate.

I did however notice that if you mirror the image of the spot it looks closer to the actual Haitian islands....




posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 09:11 PM
link   
WOW! what a stretch.....



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 09:14 PM
link   
Hey Gang, is it just me, or does the current SOHO sunspot look a lot like the Salton Sea in California, where things have been acting up a bit lately?

[edit on 14-1-2010 by freetree64]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 09:20 PM
link   
I drove accross our harbour bridge the day of the earthquake. I knew something would happen if I did that!



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Another possible historical correlation brought to my attention by member grantbeed is that of Solar Cycle 18, the 'Great Sunspots of 1947,' and the supposed Roswell Crash in July of that year. Check out this link for a bit of backstory and detail of the claims:

The Great 1947 Sunspot, Roswell, and Coronal Mass Ejections


At the time of the reported crash the Sun was just at the peak of its sunspot cycle and that year, 1947, the largest sunspot ever recorded on the surface of the Sun appeared, lasting for months, an event that may not have been built into any orbital equation. If you look at the graph below you will see how large it was and how much larger it was over any previous time or since:




It's proposed that the object that crashed in the desert was in fact a Bracewell Probe (a hypothetical messenger or observational probe sent to Earth from somewhere else) that was knocked out of orbit because of unexpected energies emitted from the Sun. Interesting reading and highly speculative, much like this thread.

Here are a few links about solar cycle 18, the Great Sunspot of 1947, and other similar correlations:

History's Biggest Sunspots

Sunspots and their Relation to UFO Sightings

Council report on solar activity in 1947

New Statistical Method of Predicting Sunspots

Sunspots and Human Behavior

Sunspot Cycles and Human History

[edit on 14/1/10 by Evasius]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 10:12 PM
link   
earthquake are caused by the movement of the plate tectonics ... but yes, it seems that Volcanoes and the movement of magma do cause it too

so you are saying that the sunspot would cause the movement of the magma or something ...

well, the best thing would be to research all the recent earthquakes and to get information on sunspots

[edit on 14-1-2010 by Faiol]



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 10:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Shakesbeer
 


It's interesting that you have mirrored this image, because all the sunspot pictures we actually see are "upside down" anyway!

Like when you look through a telescope and images are upside down. Same as the Solar Images.




posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 11:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Shakesbeer
 


Here's a direct comparison to the rotated image:



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 11:47 PM
link   
correct me if i am wrong because i don't know much about this topic.

During sun spots there is an increase in solar activity / solar flares, which affects our magnetosphere, which is generated from the earth's core?

If what i just said is corrected is it possible that the earth quake was caused this way?
Solar flare affects the magnetosphere and causes some type of chain reaction to the earths core resulting in an earthquake??



posted on Jan, 14 2010 @ 11:54 PM
link   
en.wikipedia.org...

Guys, am i thinking that this is a prelude to a solar flare??? the spots look big.

Just pointing it out...



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 12:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol
well, the best thing would be to research all the recent earthquakes and to get information on sunspots
[edit on 14-1-2010 by Faiol]


Yes......but then you would quickly discover that this theory only holds water in some cases and since we are looking for evidence to support this theory we are working very hard on ignoring things like..



With a deathtoll like that i would have expected at least a little spot, right??

Deny ignorance??

Peace



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 01:29 AM
link   
Here's how i always thought things work....




The part of the mantle near the crust, about 50-100 km down, is especially soft and plastic, and is called the asthenosphere. The mantle and crust above are cool enough to be tough and elastic, and are known as the lithosphere. A heavy load on the crust, like an ice cap, large glacial lake, or mountain range, can bend the lithosphere down into the asthenosphere, which can flow out of the way. The load will sink until it is supported by buoyancy. If an ice cap melts or lake dries up due to climatic changes, or a mountain range erodes away, the lithosphere will buoyantly rise back up over thousands of years. This is the process of isostatic rebound.


Earth's interior

I could believe that on a microscale isostatic rebound is also occuring because of weather patterns like prolonged and heavy rain/snowfall in one area of the world.

Since weather patterns are closely related to sunspots (fact! read Solar Relations to Weather by Clayton, H. H.)
All the evidence seems in place for the theory that sunspot have an indirect effect on earthquakes but it will remain a one-way system!!! Sunspots are not gonna form in the shape of the land where it will occure because neither our weathersystem nor our isostatic rebound can relay this information back to our sun.....

I am pretty much done with this theory.....

Peace



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 01:31 AM
link   
Interesting take, OP! S&F!

reply to post by operation mindcrime
 


you're only taking into account one "aspect" of the sun... what about the other "sides"?



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 01:38 AM
link   

reply to post by SerialLurker
 

you're only taking into account one "aspect" of the sun... what about the other "sides"?


You mean to tell me that during that solar minimum with +400 spotless days, all the spots were at the other side of the sun?!?!?!?!

That is profound!! You should call up NASA and tell then that there is not such thing as a quiet spotless sun. All the spots are on the other side!!



I am truely sorry but that is ridiculous..

Peace


[edit on 15/1/2010 by operation mindcrime]



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 01:56 AM
link   
Maybe off here, but has anyone else had insomnia this week? I usually don't and it has been no fun. It started on 1/8/2010. The same time 1040 started rotating towards us. Just curious.



posted on Jan, 15 2010 @ 02:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by operation mindcrime

reply to post by SerialLurker
 

you're only taking into account one "aspect" of the sun... what about the other "sides"?


You mean to tell me that during that solar minimum with +400 spotless days, all the spots were at the other side of the sun?!?!?!?!

That is profound!! You should call up NASA and tell then that there is not such thing as a quiet spotless sun. All the spots are on the other side!!



I am truely sorry but that is ridiculous..

Peace


[edit on 15/1/2010 by operation mindcrime]


Well, I don't know anything about sun spots. It was just an idea.



top topics
 
128
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join