It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Does "Regional Government" Mean to Us?(Obama's Ex.Ord.)

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 10:47 PM
link   
I'm posting this as follow-up to the news of Obama's new Exexutive Order establishing the Council of Governors over 10 Regions.

What is the meaning of Regional Governance? It means we're that much closer to World Government! (And seems to signify that our American way of doing things is done away with.)

This requires further looking into,but this is a start to understanding the bigger picture. I hope it is helpful.


From
www.sweetliberty.org...



Governance - as opposed to Government - means "control by rules, restrictions and regulations". That's a far cry from our elective, representative form of government where laws are to be passed only by elected officials – legislators – and only in pursuance of the Constitution.


Regional Governance is a ‘layer’ – or layers – of government run by nameless, faceless and usually ruthless appointed bureaucrats who are insulated from the election process, and therefore accountable only to those who appoint them. And they will not bite the hand that feeds them. The rules and regulations being promulgated via regional governance are mandates trickled up from self-selected world policy makers at the United Nations to the federal, state and local levels.


Regional Governance is the method whereby would-be world rulers intend to control every aspect of our lives. Without the full implementation of Regional Governance, their plan for world dominance cannot succeed.



[edit on 12-1-2010 by On the Edge]




posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 11:11 PM
link   
There's not a whole lot of information I have come across yet,but this is rather indicative of what to expect...lack of attention to local issues!


From
www.informaworld.com...=all~content=a787397528



"A survey of California city planning directors finds about half to be supportive of regional government. Support is higher in the San Francisco Bay area than in the Los Angeles area. Planning directors strongly favor a role for regional government in “system-maintenance” functions and in environmental protection, but most oppose its involvement in “life-style” services and local growth regulations. Many question the ability of regional governments to solve problems or respond effectively to local issues. As in studies of citizens' preferences, the predictors of support for regional government involve perceived self-interest and a willingness to give up local control. The article points out the implications for states seeking to include regional governance in growth management"



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 11:16 PM
link   
Once I Googled "Regional Government and the NWO",it all opens up....

Now you know what to look for,in regards to the Bigger Picture!

From www.jeremiahproject.com...


By Executive Order No. 11647 on Feb. 10, 1972, President Nixon announced the United States was divided into 10 Federal Regional Councils, each controlled by an appointed bureaucrat for the stated purpose of improving coordination of the activities of all levels of government. The 10 federal regions were to be empowered to control all forms of regionalism within the U.S.. Regional divisions supplementing the 10 federal regions include state subregions, federal reserve regions, population regions, and regions to control the land, water and natural resources of America.

The goal of regional or metropolitan government is to eventually merge the U.S. into the "New World Order" - a one world socialist state under the United Nations.

Regional government is a plan to eventually control all facets of our lives."...

[edit on 12-1-2010 by On the Edge]



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 11:47 PM
link   
from
causapatet.blogspot.com...


It’s also worth pointing out that this new Council represents yet another avenue through which the president can circumvent congressional resistance to military adventurism, in the highly unlikely event that such resistance were to coalesce.

While it’s true that Obama’s executive order will not immediately result in troops flooding our cities and detention camps springing from the soil, it represents a critical milestone on the road to undisguised dictatorship. -



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 01:05 AM
link   
Perhaps the Russian professor was correct in his prediction?

DECEMBER 29, 2008

WSJ.com

As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.

And discussed here

www.abovetopsecret.com...

WTF is the reason why the 50 governors we ALREADY have are unable to preform these new...yet to be determined, duties the puppet in chief has in store?

WTF is the reason why the 100 senetors we ALREADY have are unable to preform these new...yet to be determined, duties the puppet in chief has in store?

WTF is the reason why the 435 congressmen we ALREADY have are unable to preform these new...yet to be determined, duties the puppet in chief has in store?

The 10 new "Governors" to be APPOINTED by the current liar/puppet/president of what used to be known as the United States of America?

Five from each party...BFD, we've caught on to that tired charade long ago.

I don't like this at all.

This appears to be a circumvention of two branches of federal government, and all of state government.

This executive order appears to potentially be, one of the last dominoes placed before the fall.

The clouds of overt fascism are about to reign upon us?



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by TaZCoN
 


Yep,only instead of six,it's ten!

These 10 regions each have their own Northcom commander(one of the sites I referenced has this in more detail.)

So,the 50 United States of America...just a memory!

Pretty sneaky,huh?

I haven't studied the North American Union enough,but how does this fit into that scenario? I'll be checking.



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 02:12 AM
link   
Here's what I posted in the other thread on this subject. It certainly doesn't seem to have anything to do with Martial law. Just another example of the transfer of a states' authority to the Federal Government's.


Maybe this is the motivation behind this Executive Order:



(d)
synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States


Read the preamble to the Order:


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America,including section 1822 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008


So what additional authority was gained through the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008.

Section 1822 states this:


The President shall establish a bipartisan Council of Governors to advise the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the White House Homeland Security Council on matters related to the National Guard and civil support missions.


However it looks like the reason for this section is due to a previous section 1812:


(a) Joint Activity of the Department of Defense- Subsection (a) of section 10501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking `joint bureau of the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force' and inserting `joint activity of the Department of Defense'.


So if I am understanding correctly, the National Guard is now the tool of the Department of Defense.

Sec 1813 under (a)(1)


(13)(A) Assisting the Secretary of Defense in facilitating and coordinating with the entities listed in subparagraph (B) the use of National Guard personnel and resources for operations conducted under title 32, or in support of State missions.


I couldn't find where is specified specific operations in tilte 32 of the U.S. Code. Maybe they are refering to this?

TITLE 32 > CHAPTER 9 > § 904 Homeland defense duty


(a) Full-Time National Guard Duty.— All duty performed under this chapter shall be considered to be full-time National Guard duty under section 502 (f) of this title. Members of the National Guard performing full-time National Guard duty in the Active Guard and Reserve Program may support or execute homeland defense activities performed by the National Guard under this chapter.


So if I am understanding correctly, I think the National Guard is under the sole authority of the Department of defense?

EDIT TO ADD:

This Order seems to have nothing to do with Martial Law. Can anybody explain why anyone would think this would have anything to do with martial law?



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 02:30 AM
link   
It relates to Martial Law, because it sets up the framework for the use of federal troops and the combination of state and federal agencies under the Defense Department.

In a 'word', FEMA



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 02:35 AM
link   
reply to post by shasta9600
 





It relates to Martial Law, because it sets up the framework for the use of federal troops and the combination of state and federal agencies under the Defense Department. In a 'word', FEMA


That's an answer I can accept. I was just missing why everyone was claiming this Order was authorizing Martial law or that these Governors would have any direct authority over the citizens of a region.



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 02:48 AM
link   
This makes sense.

From
www.knowthelies.com.../5077



To the reasons for Obama instituting those mechanisms of state needed to subjugate his own people, these reports further warn, is due to the expected eruption into violence, if not outright civil war, of the American people, who, while their moneyed and government elite classes continue to lavish upon themselves billions of dollars, are losing all hope as the collapse of their economy continues unabated and the numbers of them without work is nearing 20%.


And we already know the powers FEMA has,so,we see where this is headed. And with the financial collapse probably only months away,...

All our worst fears are coming true!

And no one better say this is a Republican vs. Democrat issue at this point! This is a "We the People" issue. (Anyone still defending Obama or our government in general must themselves be either a traitor,in denial,or too stupid to see what's in plain sight!) Forgive me for saying so!


[edit on 13-1-2010 by On the Edge]

[edit on 13-1-2010 by On the Edge]

[edit on 13-1-2010 by On the Edge]



posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by harvib
reply to post by shasta9600
 





It relates to Martial Law, because it sets up the framework for the use of federal troops and the combination of state and federal agencies under the Defense Department. In a 'word', FEMA


That's an answer I can accept. I was just missing why everyone was claiming this Order was authorizing Martial law or that these Governors would have any direct authority over the citizens of a region.


It seems to be a major step towards controlling the masses when an uprising finaly takes place.

This is the connection I see. We know the U.S is divided into 10 FEMA zones. Now we see this appointment of 10 council of governors, from this Executive Order. This could easily be used to organize Martial Law.




top topics



 
0

log in

join