posted on Jun, 4 2012 @ 05:48 PM
Each has their own style, and like other posters have already said Noory seems to let others have their limelight giving them a better leg to stand on
in expressing themselves. I find with Art, he likes to steer the topics himself, and inserts odd variables in the interviews to change it up.. to make
it seem to have more "mystique" or something.
I do like both, don't really know anything about them personally. Art Bell's views are really disheartening if true, considering the environment he
was in, you figure he'd be past that. I know nothing about Noory. I do know there is a website basically dedicated to hating Noory's guts, and it's
exceedingly venomous and surreal, with daily posts in the forums spitting said venom.
Personally, I do not bother "tuning in" to live casts at all, unless it's something I know I will certainly enjoy.. Like Graham Hancock or
something. Which is rare.. normally C2C is a total crap-shoot, running the gamut of either being "really fascinating" or really "batchit
crazy-talk for 4 hours". So I usually sort through the "classics" listings or by guest/title. To be perfectly honest, I don't care much about
the host as I do the guest or subject matter.