Patterned Adaptation Frequency, page 1

The ultimate concept of how all things came to be the basic structure that binds everything together. Completionality Retro Hedron(the only actual geometric shape that exists) a slightly off complete right* angle your 114 degree natural angle of the aperture of light the arc it travels in. Light does not travel in particle form in a straight line it is effected by the gravitational constant of the universe as well. Suffice it to say but the first original sponse that formed this universe was actually so dense that it would still leave a resonating gravidic footprint for the eternity of this universes lifespan.

* a right angle represents the initial curve the first form of light made during the formation of this universe would basically be the identifier that makes it different than any of its universal distinguishes - its called right because light moves opposite its source of generation and in the contentment of the current sponse it would be reciprocated at an ocular angle always be in some sort of curve IE the first demonstration of variance in this universe to exist in reality. So if this was a universe at a curvature of 114 degrees compared to say 115 degrees it would make the difference in its uniformed differentiality. The initial bang that created the universe also created a stastic shell immediately around the reciprocating duality completion rectifier basically the end of the universe the inertia wall would have been already preformed at the instant of the initial reaction that you guys call the big bang. Each universe is statistic from the other you couldnt just cut a hole into this preformed wall you would be unable to. Say if you were trying to shoot it with like a missile to fracture it it would already be preformed to the explosion caused by the missile but this is if the missile was moving not at the the speed of light or some transwarp hyperdrive nonsense but basically be able to exist at to points at each of the end of the universal whole. one would say there is no end to the universe well in all truth there is but there isnt its kinda weird in nature. In reality the wall of un precievable inertia would always cause you to travel at right angle in complete orientation. An odd way to put it is if you were ever moving at a complete 360 angle in all directions at the same time like a spinning top even if you were one degree off - if you were always traveling at an acute angle simply based upon any none straight line you would never get to the end of your destination you would always eventually end up back where you started. So if the universe is 37 trillion light years in diameter would be the current aperture size of this universe per universal cubic the universe is allot bigger than 37 trillion light years basically im telling you the time for light to come back to itself had it been traveling throughout the universe for eternity along its natural curve. you may ask then why does it appear more vast than that the fact is not all the galaxies you see at certain existences still exist and newly formed galaxies would not be necessarily within your planets range yet or not. So you have no way of knowing how old anything really is ultimately in this universe because what you see would be like standing under blinking Christmas lights not all the galaxies you see are still active and there are many new formed ones that havent sent light to your planet yet. So regardless of you what you see in space is like a temporary view at how things were in about a 37 trillion year window. Galaxies are many eons years old they have seen plenty of differences in the universe from a universal storm of an instant spectrality in all parts of the universe would be basically a catastrophe on a universal scale. Something that probably basicly was like a shockwave that existeded pretty much everywhere all at once in the universe but you had to be definitely even more advanced than even alot of aliens from avoiding. Not to worry this probably only would happen once every several trillion years. Would more or less zap life back into submission throughout the universe every so often but so infrequent to actually destroy all life basically they just make it so life has to force readapt again to all the changing stars basically the life needs to pretty much go extinct or at least all the life that didnt evolve fast enough. Pretty much though even if you had a 5 trillion year window that would be countless generations of new species many of them capable of surviving the recurring spectrality that in essence zaps the universe with a completed electrified field its would basically be the universe overloading from to much ionized light particles created from all the stars in the universe. Ionized light would fuse and become basicly hot not like it would blow anything up but it would pretty much incinerate all of the underformed life in the universe. Basically however all surviving life that were advanced enough to pass through the overload unscathed would really not require planetoids anymore at least not habitable ones basically because even on a earth like planet they would still need to generate an artificial environment to survive. The universe gets zapped naturaly. If you take a window for life to form on a planet to even precivilazation would be no longer than 1 billion years. Life evolves fast in terms of universal cycles. Think of life like this humans would represent mosquito larva in a pool of stagnant water however eventually they would adapt with wings to becoming able to move to almost any location visibly perceivable these fliers would be the representations of any of the next completion stages of setientiality after themselves.

Oddly enough when i describe things they go into and from theory to theory they really dont belong on any particular bored in general. I guess i could only condone a belief system that was based in only theories that included all aspects of formulation through particulates. particle physics, quantum mechanics, advanced mechanics, actual mechanics*. But really i dont think knowledge of universal duality is in any way a requirement for even a religion. Even Jesus may have been deeply spiritual but he would have theoretically be the smartest person to ever exist at his time. But then again who would want to here any thing of temporal theory back then?

*A formalistic explanation methodology