It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truth_of_truth
reply to post by adifferentbreed
no one should stand in the way of two people who love eachother from gettin married
Originally posted by Magnum007
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Don't you live in a "free country"? Shouldn't you be able to do what you want? Here's one that will stir the pot a little...
Go back, oh let's say, 200 years... Women were married by the age of 14 or soon after their puberty started... Why you ask? Because they were ready to have children. Society has decided that women should not have children before a certain age, not biology...
And that religion of yours that says that it's not ok for 2 men to marry, well it also says that it's ok for old men to touch little boys if you are preaching that religion... At least it says it by its actions, or lack of...
Peace,
Magnum
[edit on 10/1/11 by Magnum007]
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by Magnum007 reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Society also says that they do not want two people of the same sex called a married couple. Why? What impact will it have on society and marriage as a whole? How will this benefit society?Hrmm 1.) No where did I say I was Catholic. I used to be Baptist . . . now I am non-denominational. 2.) No where in the Bible does it say it is okay to touch little boys. Even so, the amount of priests that molested children account for about 4% of the total amount of priests. Way to make two totally baseless assumptions and generalizations, making yourself look like an ass in the process.
And that religion of yours that says that it's not ok for 2 men to marry, well it also says that it's ok for old men to touch little boys if you are preaching that religion... At least it says it by its actions, or lack of... Peace, Magnum [edit on 10/1/11 by Magnum007]
Originally posted by Magnum007
Society says it doesn't want 2 people of the same sex married; according to who? Is that an assumption?
How will marriage between man and woman benefit society compared to a marriage between man and a man, or woman and a woman?
And BTW I wasn't talking about the bible when I said it was supposedly ok to touch little boys... Notice the line after that said something like "At least it says it by its actions, or lack of...".
One more question... Are you making up statistics about sexual abuse cases in the church? 4%? Where did you get that?
. . .
How will marriage between man and woman benefit society compared to a marriage between man and a man, or woman and a woman?
Originally posted by Zenic
Really? It doesn't matter. The fact remains that ignorent bigots are discriminating against a group of individuals. This is no different than if the government out lawed a type of religion.
In X amount of years when this is said and done and gays and lesbians have the same rights as everyone else our children, grand children or great grand children will look back and shake their heads at us for being no naive.
In reality, this prop only passed because almost half the state of California has been indoctrinated by a hateful group of religious fanatics. And I'm not an athiest or an agnostic... so lets not assume I don't believe in God. I just don't believe God is hateful like humanity is.
We do not follow in his footsteps like we like to say we do.
Originally posted by truth_of_truth
reply to post by adifferentbreed
no one should stand in the way of two people who love eachother from gettin married
Originally posted by Zenic
reply to post by Dark Ghost
Really? It doesn't matter. The fact remains that ignorent bigots are discriminating against a group of individuals. This is no different than if the government out lawed a type of religion.
In X amount of years when this is said and done and gays and lesbians have the same rights as everyone else our children, grand children or great grand children will look back and shake their heads at us for being no naive.
In reality, this prop only passed because almost half the state of California has been indoctrinated by a hateful group of religious fanatics. And I'm not an athiest or an agnostic... so lets not assume I don't believe in God. I just don't believe God is hateful like humanity is.
We do not follow in his footsteps like we like to say we do.
Originally posted by Magnum007
reply to post by americandingbat
That's exactly what happened in Canada. Gay's are married/"unioned" by a Justice of the Peace (Judge) and are recognized as if they were married in a union of faith. All the good stuff and all the bad, all come along with that union.
Originally posted by Magnum007
Here in Canada it is clear in our Charter that there should be no discrimination in any way whatsoever therefore making same sex marriage legal.
Originally posted by WTFover
reply to post by Avenginggecko
The clause "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." is now officially part of the California state constitution (as of November 5, 2008).
www.whatisprop8.com...
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or
recognized in California.
www.leginfo.ca.gov...
This is a Constitutional Amendment, instituted by the voters of California. It cannot be an "unconstitutional law", it is a part of the Constitution.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
So I should be able to marry my mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, etc?
How about multiple people?
Multiple family members?
How about a 12 year old?
Multiple 12 year olds?