It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Historical results of Gun Control.

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 26 2004 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheRebel22
and they have high murder rates.

please no more gun-control rambling you dirty red commy! lol j/k. but you are commy!


I'm not even left.
And no they don't have higher mureder rates.




posted on May, 26 2004 @ 01:29 PM
link   


What about letting people have stun guns and pepper spray. Why not make protection less lethal for those who would want that.


That's a hoot. And when the guy says, "Give me all your money", and you pull out the pepper spray, he'll pull out his gun and say, "stupid idiot, bringing cayanne to a gun fight..."""


"If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."



posted on May, 28 2004 @ 02:03 AM
link   
Let's look at another country, Canada we've always had more restrictive gun laws and we have a much better crime rate then the U.S. I'm sorry but I find a good chunk of this thread insulting when you're trying to connect gun control to genocide.



posted on May, 28 2004 @ 02:33 AM
link   
I'm sorry but Canada has to be the poorest example on anything related to violent acts. I mean no disrespect to you or your country, but when one thinks of Violence/Aggression Canada falls way at the bottom and it has nothing to do with gun control it has to do with your people and their personality traits/mindsets. With the exception of hockey and that one street where you guys fight outside the bars there isn't anything violent about Canada and thats not a bad thing. But it has nothing to do with your gun laws. Even if it did your looking at one country out of how many? And even then what is the difference? It all boils down to the people as a whole.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join