It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Meet Roxxxy the robotic girlfriend

page: 2
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 01:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by rhynouk
 


jesus...i can see it now...if they get this doll close to what a woman can do sexually?...then a date night will be a viagra pill and a "reality doll" ....men will be staying home...the bars will be empty... clubs close from lack of business, even mainstreet hookers giving discounts for lack of customers.

and if women get their well proportioned, intelligently motorized, and endowed, "hunk doll" ....well....population control will not be a pressing concern



Sounds like a better place to me, less competition on the streets means more real women for myself. They can have their robot dolls, I'll take the real deal, even though the real deal talks more.




posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 03:29 AM
link   
i think this product is cool and after more manufacturing iterations would be even cooler; the opposite of futurama would take place as people would devalue the value others place on their parts.pertaining sociology would the other versions effect only those who are capable of acquiring one; or do people generally devalue the opposite due to its existence.even though its more of a sex doll with robotic parts and less of a robot with sex doll functions i see many ways it could be improved.a fleshlight for the mouth but concealed is one example.the thing about this is that it would be nearly impossible for someone to recreate the sensations experienced from various sexual acts in a modality of form that is robot; maybe after further research different forms of liquids with properties that are pleasant could be used instead of the attempt to mimic a persons anatomy.

outside of the social aspects of its introduction i do not see many faults with applications of this nature coming from the robotics engineering and computer sciences fields; if anything an imaginative sexually active engineer could create new forms of robotic human interaction.



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 03:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Cygnus_Hunter
 


Same old, same old.

Men will always find some excuse to ignore their wives.

A lot of wives may be saying thanks.



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 07:19 AM
link   
Hm... as disturbing as this might seem, I see no reason to not have fun with the concept. On that note I call dibs on writing the first virus for that Sex robot. Think I'm gonna call it "headache".



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 08:03 AM
link   
I'm sure Roxxxy will be very popular with the basement dwellers of the world. I can't wait for the first marriage of Roxxxy. That will be tough to explain to the parents who are footing the bill for the wedding.

Does Roxxxy also do dishes in addition to doing Dallas??



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 08:32 AM
link   
OMG I was just looking at this, and half paying attention, when all of a sudden, Fridgid Ferrah says "911 was an inside job" and starts talking about 911 conspiracy with Bush and Cheney being in on it! I about fell out of my chair!
It is more towards the later part of the video.

www.thesun.co.uk...



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 09:12 AM
link   
What's weird about this is that in the clip round 3min the doll talks about 9/11 - stating it was an inside job.......What the He**?????


www.thesun.co.uk...



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Cygnus_Hunter
 


What is going on here exactly?

Are us men supposed to not touch another woman or something?

With all the gadgets out there for women too this is becoming slightly weird not to mention cam sex!!



posted on Jan, 11 2010 @ 02:59 PM
link   
I did not notice this thread and created new one in Breaking Alternative News - www.abovetopsecret.com... I'll ask the same question here that I raised there.

Well, there was always a talk about such Robots from quiet a number of years and now we have one. This will only refine their capabilities (model/ emotions/ sensitivity/ personality) as time passes by.

But do you think people will actually go for it? How about yourself, if given a chance will you get one for free? Does it raise any ethical/ moral questions for you? What are your views on this keeping in mind these things:


this robot's anatomically-accurate mechanical skeleton hidden underneath real-feeling "flesh" and as time goes by the expressions, traits etc will only refine.

Secondly, think of all the handicapped people who are unable to enjoy sex or marry, or are unable to find a companion. For them this could be a blessing.



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:45 AM
link   
i do not see why people emphasize certain aspects of society when all of society would be the participants of such an endeavor.at first only people within the socioeconomic bracket that would product test and refine and pay for this would be the beneficiaries. then as greater refinements came from users willing to actually attempt to make this enjoyable for a man; more refinements in manufacturing would occur.i think it is a wrong path to take to attempt to make this product like a woman and not what a man finds sexually pleasing from a womans input nodes.i would not buy one of these first generation models and if one was given to me for free it would be hard to product test it if i was under the assumption the product was to mimic a woman and not the sensations i feel from a woman when having anal sex oral sex or traditional sex; that being said, it would be hard to refine the product without sexual experience and experience as an engineer.



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 12:51 AM
link   
If they could make one look like this then I would be all over it.




posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 01:13 AM
link   
Isn't the whole point of "sex dolls" is that they keep quiet? I mean, why the hell would these guys try and make the doll "more real" by giving her a mouth?

If they wanted to make this sex doll realistic they should have her say things like "You never take me out anymore" or "You never introduce me to your friends, why not?"




posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Nice, .... finally, .. a woman I can beat who won't press charges !!!

I wonder how many enemy's I just made.


Anyway, I'm sure this will be appealing for some, .... untill the doll start's going through your cell phone and accusing you of cheating with the vaccum cleaner.



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lillydale

Sounds like there are things he really wished he had the chance to share with his friend. Maybe it is just me. It almost sounds like a used car salesman trying to slap a 9/11 sob story on his item to get into papers.

[edit on 1/10/10 by Lillydale]


I agree. This is seriously disturbing. 9/11 has NOTHING to do with a sex companion that is always ready for whatever you want to do.

With that said, imagine crazy stalkers order one of a female/male they are nuts for? They can customize it to possibly look like someone they like. yeesh.

Cant people just stick to hands and dildos?



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 06:09 PM
link   
I have to say that if they could make one that looked like this: files.abovetopsecret.com... I would not hesitate to purchase one


[edit on 12-1-2010 by NTSFR3]



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 06:18 PM
link   
With more advances in robotics and AI,does this have the makings of a new form of sexuality?Could this be a gateway for humans to accept silicone lifeforms in the future?


XL5

posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 07:37 PM
link   
Its easier to make a sexbot then it is to make a mindreading pill for couples/singles or getting girls to wear a "ready for no strings" T-shirt.

If this did take off and was perfected to the point where you couldn't tell human from robot (minus the imperfections of mind/body), the sexes would become alot more sexually equal and alot more happy.

[edit] Kay-em from Jason-X, Jean Bardot and Apollonia Vanova are my picks.

[edit on 12-1-2010 by XL5]



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 09:05 PM
link   
reply to post by XL5
 




perfected to the point where you couldn't tell human from robot


How long do you think it will be?

Here's DER-3 saying hello.

Here's a video with an extreme close up view of the face of the HRP-4C model. Freeze frame anywhere from :22 to :30 and imagine if those eyes were moving and the eyelids blinking...could she pass for human?

I see these videos I think five years is enough. In five years we might have robots that can walk around in public without raising any eyebrows. We could probably do it now with enough funding. The only reason these things look as awkward as they do is that the developers are putting as few actuators in them as possible to keep costs down. Put in enough joints to give them as much freedom of motion as a human and we could probably build robots now that would fool people.

It won't be long.


[edit on 12-1-2010 by LordBucket]



posted on Jan, 12 2010 @ 10:24 PM
link   
BWAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Oh My God that was the funniest thing i have seen in quite some time.

(Robo lady voice) "I am hot, stud. Do you like ..... soccer? I like to use emery board on my ... foot calice"

LMAO! Who the hell programmed that thing? Because nothin turns me on like ole fashioned foot calice! lol!


XL5

posted on Jan, 13 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   
LordBucket, I give it a good 15-20 years. Sure they can make it real looking but batteries and internal space is a limiter. When brains on a chip become accepted as moral and the cost comes way down, thats when robots will good enough.

There is something to be said for acceptance/understanding from a person who grew up in same world as you yet a very different one because of different views and personallity. Then again sometimes you want to know someone without having to guess. Someone who will never hurt you, make you answer damned if you do damned if you don't questions, someone who has no ego and will stop doing something that really bugs you instead of calling you out because you made him/her aware of it. I could go on and on. Real "companion" bots wouldn't need off switches, you could teach/program them in real time to stop and or start doing something when ever you want without an argument.

IMO girls are like the govt. You wouldn't really want to live without one but you would like one where you had more say and you could understand it all without having to read all the conditions, legal talk, mind mazes and new rules that go into effect without any due warning.




top topics



 
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join