Giza Pyramid Machines: Their true purpose finally revealed.

Ps- an afterthought; your use of the word 'fringe' in a derogatory sense neglects the fact that most major scientific discoveries, or indeed schools of thought were , in fact, considered 'fringe' at some point.
You could name them all- Copernicus, through to Marie Curie , Charles Darwin - all these momentous minds( and the list is as long as your arm) were on the 'fringe' once, so using it in the way you do to belittle and dismiss doesn't do anyone any favours. It's simply an idea you disagree with. a reply to: Harte

originally posted by: bluesfreak
Ps- an afterthought; your use of the word 'fringe' in a derogatory sense neglects the fact that most major scientific discoveries, or indeed schools of thought were , in fact, considered 'fringe' at some point.
You could name them all- Copernicus, through to Marie Curie , Charles Darwin - all these momentous minds( and the list is as long as your arm) were on the 'fringe' once, so using it in the way you do to belittle and dismiss doesn't do anyone any favours. It's simply an idea you disagree with. a reply to: Harte

Actually, they weren't considered "fringe" for the most part. For example, Darwin was not the first to propose the same mechanism for species - he was just the first to get wide publication and there were similar ideas around. It was accepted by his peers as being sound. Marie Curie likewise was not considered "outrageous" (beyond the fact that a woman made the discovery) since Becquerel and others were aware of radioactivity as a phenomena and the model of radioactivity was actually her PhD thesis.

originally posted by: bluesfreak
The word "Pyramid" comes from Greek : "Pyra" = Fire "mid"= Middle (or centre) "Fire in the middle " WHY?
It is not describing a geometrical shape, but a description of function. Why is this?

Actually, it doesn't.

"Mid" isn't a Greek word - it's Germanic and "pyre" is Latin.

Interesting! I still maintain that many 'breakthroughs' in science (or any subject for that matter)must start on the 'fringe' at some point in some way or another.
a reply to: Byrd

This is a very interesting thread, I've been a 'lurker' here for a LONG time, and this post is quite fascinating.
I still have some questions though!!
A) has anyone actually satisfactorily answered if ANY bodies have ever been found in ANY of the pyramids in Egypt?
B) why no decoration inside the 'tomb' of the great Pyramid? Cheops obviously had a bit of an ego if that was constructed as his tomb, surely the inside where the 'sarcophagus' is found would be literally plastered with glory to him and all he did in his lifetime, and his glory in the next life.
They spent such effort in building it, and yet, there is a lack of glorification of him inside.
C) why build to such a high degree of tolerances throughout? I have seen people 'laser level' the inside of the 'kings chamber' and its walls, and it shows a near perfection which, as a machinist, is a beautiful thing to behold.
D) what is the purpose of the other cavities inside if there is already a 'kings chamber' for his body? That's a lot of effort ( and exacting craftsmanship) for no reason at all.
E) is there any mention of treasures and a body being found when the GP was first opened up?
F) the Sarcophogus: many sarcophagi were found with perhaps two, or three separate 'coffins' inside, kind of like those Russian dolls. Is this sarcophagus big enough to contain a couple , or maybe three separate caskets within it?
And why make the 3 faced corners within it to the tolerance of 1 ten thousandth of an inch?
G) IS there an aquifer underneath the GP?
H) WERE the walls really lined with salt when the GP was first opened?
Just curious...

a reply to: seattletruth

Hi Seattletruth

how interesting, I think it will take me a long while to read and scroll through. I was only reading some interesting some material on the Giza Pyramid from an alternative source this week!

The Lost Treasures of Ashmodon by Olaf H. Hage III
Copyright ©2017 by the Olaf H. Hage Literary Trust, all rights reserved. To learn more about Olaf Hage’s reports, books, interviews, and other media, email [email protected] or visit the Trust’s website olafhage.com.... To receive Olaf’s periodic reports, send an email. The reports distributed free on the Internet.

Normally, I try to keep myself out of these accounts of history, especially those that are as ancient as the Pyramids. But in this case, I find myself personally entangled in the subject matter. Or to put it another way, how the information unfolded to me has become part of the story. Time and again, as I pursued this investigation, I felt the need for a T-square and a protractor or compass to make measurements. It was strange to be made continually aware that the two symbols of Freemasonry provided the essential keys to solving riddle after riddle related to the Great Pyramid and a fabled lost treasure. But this is getting well ahead of the story.

Let’s go back to the beginning. For thousands of years, people have speculated about the origin and purpose of the Great Pyramid. There are dozens of theories: Among the more bizarre ideas is that the Pyramid was a beacon for aliens. But why would aliens need such a primitive technology to guide them? Some have suggested the Pyramid was a granary to store food during great famines, such as the one Joseph helped his family survive. Yet there were huge granaries at Saqqara just south of Giza, and the capacity of the Pyramid was hardly enough to feed one large family. The Pyramid was certainly not built to store grain and not needed for that. A few have proposed that the Pyramid was some kind of water-pumping device for the desert. Normally, the Nile rose so high each year it flooded the land. Except for a severe famine, the Pyramid would not be needed, if it really were a pump.

Also, there is the lack of any constructed channel for water to get to or from the Pyramid. Another idea is that the Pyramid was a sort of energy power plant. If so, then what were all the other pyramids used for? How this power would have been transmitted or used is not clear. I could find no evidence for any electric use other than lighting in ancient Egypt, but the device producing the light was small and portable, not a pyramid. The traditional theory is that it was simply a big stone tomb. At first, that seems an obvious explanation. After all, a large stone sarcophagus was found in the King’s Chamber. On the other hand, the capacity of that sarcophagus was actually an Egyptian unit of measure, and so perhaps it was not intended as a sarcophagus at all. Still, no human body has been found buried in a pyramid of any kind in Egypt. In fact, according to the Greek historian Herodotus, writing in the fifth century B.C., the Egyptians told him that the

Pharaoh Cheops, who supposedly built the Great Pyramid, was buried elsewhere. If there were anyone buried there, then, it was not Cheops. The Pyramid seems to be an enduring puzzle without an easy solution. It took a lot of people a lot of time and expense to build it. Perhaps the solution lies not in who built it, but rather, who designed it. Many believe that the genius Imhotep was either the designer or the inspiration for it. He supposedly died around the time it was built, and it is not clearly stated whether he oversaw its construction or left behind plans for it.

Imhotep was not the cruel fiend of the Mummy movies. That Imhotep is one of Hollywood’s silly fantasies. The real Imhotep was perhaps the single most revered man in all of Egypt. He was a genius of the first rank: a writer, mathematician, architect, physician, scientist, inventor, and brilliant government administrator. He was not Egyptian, but rather, came into Egypt as a Semitic slave who somehow rose to become second only to Pharaoh himself in power. When he reached that status, he was said to have protected Egypt from a severe seven-year famine. If all this sounds familiar, it should. It is the story of Joseph the Israelite, who also came into Egypt as a Semitic slave, rose to be second to Pharaoh, and was a physician and genius who saved the nation from a seven-year famine. Their lives are almost identical, and yet most scholars accept Imhotep as real but reject Joseph as a fable.

Perhaps the answer is that Joseph is a Biblical character in Genesis, and most scholars automatically reject anything from the book of Genesis. The other problem is that Joseph is generally dated to 1800 (±150 years) B.C., whereas Imhotep is dated c. 2600 B.C. Both dates are in error. I have argued that Genesis used a seven-fold Sabbatical cycle, which moves Joseph back before 4000 B.C. Moreover, Egyptian history lost 1,400-2,000 years when modern Egyptologists rejected the Seventh Dynasty (70 kings ruling for 70 generations). Restoring the missing Seventh Dynasty moves Imhotep back to the same epoch as Joseph.

The tomb of Imhotep has never been found. We know that Joseph had been buried for a time in Egypt, but he was removed from his tomb one night by Moses and carried back to be buried in the Holy Land in the tomb of the Patriarch Abraham (cf. Exodus 13:19). So, there should be an empty tomb left in Egypt where Joseph/Imhotep had been buried temporarily. This description fits the empty sarcophagus in the Great Pyramid. But, how could Moses simply have walked into the Great Pyramid overnight, when it took many years for the Arabs and others to force their way in?

It turns out that, unlike all other known pyramids, the Great Pyramid had a secret door that was built to easily swing open, if you knew where to find it. (Tompkins 1978, p. 3) Moreover, there was a hidden way up around the large stones blocking the main passageway, which would allow anyone who knew the secret to accessing the sarcophagus. The key here is that the builder or his stone masons would have to have passed these secrets down to some later person who would thereby be enabled to enter the Pyramid quickly in order to remove something that the builder had hidden. Thus, if the builder were Joseph, the swinging door implies that a later Israelite would eventually be told the secret so that he could quickly retrieve something of great value, presumably Joseph’s body and/or some other treasure. This certainly sounds like Moses the night he retrieved the body of Joseph from his tomb in Egypt. From where did Moses retrieve Joseph’s body?

According to the Book of Exodus, Joseph’s body was obtained the night Israel camped at what was then an apparently well-known place called Succoth. What was Succoth? It was once thought that Succoth was a village where over three million Israelites unexpectedly showed up one night. That idea was absurd. An alternative was proposed: “Succoth” means “tents” in Hebrew. So, it was suggested “Succoth” was simply a “tent city.” But that conflicts with the text that says they journeyed “to Succoth.” (Exodus 12:37) Succoth was known as a specific geographic place.

Yet, Israel’s huge population and their flocks could not be crammed into some now-vanished village. So, it was a well-known place with its own name, but not a town. What well-known place could that be? The answer is in the Hebrew: “Tents.” Succoth was a place that looked like a group of tents. In other words, Succoth looked like the pyramids of Giza, which looked like a group of tents. “Succoth” was simply a Hebrew nickname for “Pyramids.”

This indicates that the Israelites were camped at Giza the night Moses retrieved the body of Joseph. So, the idea that Joseph had designed the Great Pyramid of Giza as a temporary burial site is fully consistent with his body being found at “Succoth.” I am now convinced that the Great Pyramid of Giza was built by Israelites under Joseph’s guidance, just as the Masons have claimed. Joseph made sure his heirs had the ability to get into his Succoth tomb easily, even at night, and take out his body for transport to the Holy Land, where Joseph had buried his father Jacob (cf. Genesis 50:24-26).

To achieve his goal, Joseph had to design the Pyramid down to the tiniest detail, for the delicately balanced swinging door was hidden by its off-center location: exactly 286.1 “Pyramid inches” from the center-line of the structure, on the north face and well up the polished stone wall. One would have to know the exact site of the door on the enormous north face of the structure in order to get inside. It was a simple, yet secure, way to protect his body. But it meant that Israelites had to have very precise control over the construction process to make sure that Joseph’s intention was carried out.

Why would Joseph go to such trouble? One could assume he simply wanted to be buried with his father in the Holy Land, but that seems too egotistical an explanation. Was there something else buried with Joseph that needed protection from the Egyptians for centuries? One thing we know Moses also took out of Egypt was a book or a collection of books. The literature of ancient Israel, that in theory was in their possession before they left Egypt, included most of Genesis, several of the Proverbs, the book of Job, and some of the Psalms and parts of the Song of Songs. Parts of the Books of Jubilees and Jasher, non-Genesis material about Adam and Eve, and other apocryphal texts imply that other significant pre-Exodus literature might also have been already with the Israelites in Egypt during the days of Joseph.

Could it be that Moses acquired Joseph’s entire personal library the night he removed the “bones” of Joseph from the Great Pyramid? Is it possible Egypt had destroyed or confiscated some of Israel’s books? Scribes were considered almost god-like in ancient Egypt. Being a Scribe, Imhotep/Joseph was greatly honored, even worshiped eventually. The writing was deemed a magical, divine gift intended only for initiates. Not even the Pharaohs could read and write. Having a Scribe paint hieroglyphs on the walls of a tomb was a high honor given to the dead. Thus, because they were slaves, the rest of the Israelites were forbidden to be Scribes.

As a Scribe, Joseph could have paper, ink, and pens, while these things were denied to Israelites in general. The famine certainly puts a premium on papyrus plants, the source of Egyptian paper. Joseph’s books would have been highly valued, and just as Pharaohs had their possessions buried with them, it may have been required that Imhotep/Joseph have his entire library buried with him in his tomb, the Great Pyramid. 1,200 years after the Exodus, Egypt routinely confiscated books on ships docking at Alexandria. These books were placed in the Library of Alexandria. The goal was to gain a monopoly over learning so that scholars would be forced to travel to Alexandria. As a result, this great library often had the world’s only copy of a book. When it inevitably burned, this selfish policy cost the world whole categories of ancient literature, and the loss of much of mankind’s history.

There were four destructions of Alexandria’s libraries, from the fire of Julius Caesar’s time to the final destruction of the Great Quake of the Middle Ages. Christians caused none of these. The fire of A.D. 391, which some Islamic scholars attribute indirectly to a Christian mob, burned the Serapeum’s lending library of spare copies of magical texts, not the main Library that was in the Museum of Alexandria. So, there was a policy of book confiscation in later Egypt, and perhaps in Joseph’s day. This would explain why Joseph placed his books in his tomb for a later generation of free Israelites to retrieve and take with them to start a new nation in the Holy Land.

Joseph knew how precious literacy and literature were. Remember that for thousands of years Israel has been known as “The People of the Book,” as if other peoples were mostly illiterate, while Israelite men could all read and write, and lived by the laws of a Book. Joseph designed the Great Pyramid to be a safe temperature-controlled “library.” Joseph bequeathed his library to all Israel, thereby defining their literate destiny. Because of what Joseph did to circumvent the censors of Egypt, Christians and Jews, and the Moslems; people worldwide are now free to read, write, and to use books, magazines, newspapers and the Internet to communicate. Because of all the wisdom encoded in its design, the Pyramid is often called “a Library in Stone.” The saying may, therefore, be more literal than anyone had realized. Nevertheless, Moslem attempts to force their way into the Great Pyramid were fueled by their lust after some other “treasure” it supposedly contained. (Tompkins 1978, pp. 6, 9, 17)

Could there be another kind of treasure associated with the Pyramid? Long after the body and the full library of Joseph had been removed from Giza, stories were circulating that something more still lay hidden within that great edifice of polished and painted stones. It happens that these painted colors of the Pyramid may provide a clue to the treasure associated with it. Colorful hieroglyphs on the outer stones that told of its construction were translated for Herodotus in the fifth century B.C. In addition to the hieroglyphs, Arab legend maintained that the four sides themselves were also “painted in various colors” (Tompkins 1978, p. 2), as were the sides of the other two large pyramids at Giza.

It is believed by some that the third pyramid was painted red at the bottom and gold at the top. The middle pyramid, attributed to someone called “K-Ph-R-N” or ‘Chephren,’ may have been blue. As for the Great Pyramid itself, a surviving fragment of one side was found to have been painted with red ochre. (Tompkins 1978, pp. 265-266) The practice of painting large stone structures like ziggurats and tombs with primary colors was common in the ancient world. The colors most often used were blue, yellow, red, and green, which corresponded to the four cardinal directions of north, east, south, and west, respectively. In turn, these were identified with the four lands of Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas (from which Egypt then imported coc aine). This led to identification with their gods Isis, Horus, Ra, and Osiris, according to their sacred colors. Certain planets may also be matched with these gods: Venus, Mercury, Mars, and Saturn. Here is one possible arrangement of the Pyramid’s color associations:

Note that the Green western (American) face of the Pyramid is associated with Osiris. Sometimes Isis was identified with the East and Horus with the North. Often, they were shown together as ‘Madonna and Child.’ The northeastern realms that they ruled had included the Holy Land. Few people realize that the Blue and Gold colors associated with images of the Virgin Mary are derived from the colors of Isis, the “Ma’Donna” or “Great Lady” of Egypt, and are related to the original colors of the Pyramids. Why would Joseph paint his tomb with pagan colors? The colors were not entirely pagan. The Red also was the color of the banner of the House of Joseph, who had ruled Egypt (“the Red Land”) for Pharaoh and prophesied out of a Cup of red wine. Joseph’s children were half-African. Likewise, Blue was the Royal Blue color of the House of Judah. Levi, who ruled the Holy of Holies at the western limit of the Temple, was associated with the Rod of Aaron that budded Green. And Benjamin, the tribe of the Scribes, was in charge of the Golden Oil of anointing. Thus, Joseph could rationalize a double-meaning for the colors and the rest of the symbols involved in the design of the Pyramid. I believe this was a deliberate strategy employed by Joseph: Not only did Joseph encode all sorts of Israelite symbols into the Great Pyramid, but he also had to do it in such a way as to convince the Pharaoh that the very same symbols actually honored the Egyptians. This dual function of the Pyramid was necessary to persuade the Pharaoh to pay for that huge project

From its very beginning, then, the Pyramid was designed to conceal secrets and a treasure, to have hidden layers of meaning, and to leave behind a group of initiates who alone knew the true purposes of the structure. Although the Bible is filled with Pyramid references, Israelites seemed to lose interest in the Pyramid after retrieving Joseph’s body and library. But there is another group that claims it has preserved secrets of the Pyramid. It can cite Roman graffiti within the Pyramid to prove that someone other than the Jews knew how to get inside. Who were these forgotten initiates?

Pages 1 to 5 (there are 20 pages to this article)
Bibliography Ginzberg, Louis. 1992. Legends of the Bible. 1st Paperback. Translated by Henrietta Szold and Paul Radin. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The Jewish Publication Society. Information Please. 1998. Time Almanac 1999. Boston, Massachusetts: TimeWarner Publishers. Knight, Christopher, and Robert Lomas. 1997. The Hiram Key: Pharaohs, Freemasons and the Discovery of the Secret Scrolls of Jesus. Rockport, Massachusetts: Element Publishing. Steiger, Brad, and Sherry Steiger. 2006. Conspiracies and Secret Societies: The Complete Dossier. Canton, Michigan: Visible Ink Press. Tompkins, Peter. 1978. Secrets of the Great Pyramid. New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishing. Turner, Patricia, and Charles Russell Coulter. 2001. Dictionary of Ancient Deities. 1st. New York, New York: Oxford University Press. Walker, Barbara G. 1983. The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets. San Francisco, California: Harper and Row. Wilson, Robert Anton. 1998. Everything Is Under Control: Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-ups. New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

originally posted by: bluesfreak
A) has anyone actually satisfactorily answered if ANY bodies have ever been found in ANY of the pyramids in Egypt?

Yes, as well as intrusive burials (later date.) There are over 100 pyramids in Egypt, btw.

B) why no decoration inside the 'tomb' of the great Pyramid? Cheops obviously had a bit of an ego if that was constructed as his tomb, surely the inside where the 'sarcophagus' is found would be literally plastered with glory to him and all he did in his lifetime, and his glory in the next life.

None of the previous pyramids had any interior decorations, either. The Pyramid Texts don't appear in any pyramids until around 100 years after Giza.

They spent such effort in building it, and yet, there is a lack of glorification of him inside.

If you look at previous pyramids, they aren't inscribed inside either. The king's cult activities took place at the chapel outside the pyramid. Remember that they weren't just "pyramids" - each had a surrounding wall plus several buildings inside the wall, including a chapel with the king's statue inside.

C) why build to such a high degree of tolerances throughout? I have seen people 'laser level' the inside of the 'kings chamber' and its walls, and it shows a near perfection which, as a machinist, is a beautiful thing to behold.

I've been in there. It's beautifully done, but it's not THAT perfect. The surface is flat but it's not mirror-flat.

[D) what is the purpose of the other cavities inside if there is already a 'kings chamber' for his body? That's a lot of effort ( and exacting craftsmanship) for no reason at all.

Pyramid designs evolved. The basic layout is the same in some respects, but each new one adds some new elements. The relieving chambers in particular are a fairly old idea. The Red Pyramid (built by Knufu's father) shows some of hese elements.

E) is there any mention of treasures and a body being found when the GP was first opened up?

It was first robbed by the Egyptians (possibly as far back as 2000 BC (First Intermediate Period)), and possibly many other times. The Arabs wrote about entering it in 820 AD (and those books are still around) ... so the Europeans were only the latest to enter.

F) the Sarcophogus: many sarcophagi were found with perhaps two, or three separate 'coffins' inside, kind of like those Russian dolls. Is this sarcophagus big enough to contain a couple , or maybe three separate caskets within it?

Yes...but that kind of multiple coffin burial varied over time, as did the number of coffins involved.

And why make the 3 faced corners within it to the tolerance of 1 ten thousandth of an inch?

The tolerance isn't that good. I've looked in there.

G) IS there an aquifer underneath the GP?

Yes.

H) WERE the walls really lined with salt when the GP was first opened?

It was not mentioned in the Arabic accounts (the oldest written accounts) but in Victorian times, yes.

Your source isn't reliable... you might want to look elsewhere

originally posted by: Sharparrow
The real Imhotep was perhaps the single most revered man in all of Egypt. He was a genius of the first rank: a writer, mathematician, architect, physician, scientist, inventor, and brilliant government administrator.

Which is true. Later on, he was deified and people prayed to him.

He was not Egyptian, but rather, came into Egypt as a Semitic slave

However, that part's not true. At least one source names his mother - and he lived long before Hebrews existed.

When he reached that status, he was said to have protected Egypt from a severe seven-year famine.

That legend is from the time of the Ptolemies, two thousand years after Imhotep died.

Moreover, Egyptian history lost 1,400-2,000 years when modern Egyptologists rejected the Seventh Dynasty (70 kings ruling for 70 generations).

The 7th and 8th dynasties ruled from Memphis and there were no 70 kings or 70 generations. There is no way that the nations and kings of the 12th dynastyy-- which were with known kings and nations could be matched up.

This description fits the empty sarcophagus in the Great Pyramid.

Actually, it doesn't.

But, how could Moses simply have walked into the Great Pyramid overnight, when it took many years for the Arabs and others to force their way in?

Until well into the First Intermediate Period, the pyramid walls stood and the chapels were manned 24 hours/day by priests. They were paid to give offerings and prayers to the departed pharaohs.

This certainly sounds like Moses the night he retrieved the body of Joseph from his tomb in Egypt. From where did Moses retrieve Joseph’s body?

This narrative doesn't match the traditional ancient narratives - which should be considered when trying to unravel any Biblical puzzle. Remember that the Bible is a constructed book and that many possible books were left out of it.

originally posted by: Byrd
Your source isn't reliable... you might want to look elsewhere

originally posted by: Sharparrow
The real Imhotep was perhaps the single most revered man in all of Egypt. He was a genius of the first rank: a writer, mathematician, architect, physician, scientist, inventor, and brilliant government administrator.

Which is true. Later on, he was deified and people prayed to him.

He was not Egyptian, but rather, came into Egypt as a Semitic slave

However, that part's not true. At least one source names his mother - and he lived long before Hebrews existed.

When he reached that status, he was said to have protected Egypt from a severe seven-year famine.

That legend is from the time of the Ptolemies, two thousand years after Imhotep died.

Moreover, Egyptian history lost 1,400-2,000 years when modern Egyptologists rejected the Seventh Dynasty (70 kings ruling for 70 generations).

The 7th and 8th dynasties ruled from Memphis and there were no 70 kings or 70 generations. There is no way that the nations and kings of the 12th dynastyy-- which were with known kings and nations could be matched up.

This description fits the empty sarcophagus in the Great Pyramid.

Actually, it doesn't.

But, how could Moses simply have walked into the Great Pyramid overnight, when it took many years for the Arabs and others to force their way in?

Until well into the First Intermediate Period, the pyramid walls stood and the chapels were manned 24 hours/day by priests. They were paid to give offerings and prayers to the departed pharaohs.

This certainly sounds like Moses the night he retrieved the body of Joseph from his tomb in Egypt. From where did Moses retrieve Joseph’s body?

This narrative doesn't match the traditional ancient narratives - which should be considered when trying to unravel any Biblical puzzle. Remember that the Bible is a constructed book and that many possible books were left out of it. [/quote

a reply to: gLuEBoY

Put a battery in the sarcophagus..,.. turn the pyramid on. The book of Exodus has instructions.

originally posted by: gLuEBoY
a reply to: gLuEBoY

Put a battery in the sarcophagus..,.. turn the pyramid on. The book of Exodus has instructions.

Why not do a small scale demonstration first? Hook a battery up to a rock....Let me know what happens.

originally posted by: Byrd
It was not mentioned in the Arabic accounts (the oldest written accounts) but in Victorian times, yes.

Makes perfect sense, considering the salt deposits come from the breath of those inside the pyramid. Just goes to show how many people had been inside of it by the Victorian era...

Ta reply to: Byrd
Thanks for your reply ,Byrd,very interesting indeed. As always,food for thought.

a reply to: seattletruth

Nice. Not sure whether any contributors to this thread still actively check it, but I figured I’d throw in some thoughts for consideration.

The Giza Pyramids represent the Axis Mundi union (it’s located at the center of the Earth’s landmass) and what people refer to as the 2nd Day of Genesis. Day 1 is the Vesica Piscis, which signifies the union of Spirit and Flesh - what Ancient Egyptians referred to as the union of the Ka and the Ba to form the Akh. The Akh - the shining one - signifies the light that is the product of the union and this is what we get with the Ichthys of the Vesica Piscis - light and all of its mathematical codes and such. In Ancient Egyptian mythology regarding Creation, the story is Ra stood on Ma’at’s platform to establish the world. Ma’at is the foundation of Ancient Egyptian civilization and regarded as the reason the universe exists. This is a reference to the Vesica Piscis and is also known in Christian tradition as the Incarnation, the Immaculate Conception of Mary. The Vesica Piscis is the upward pointing star tetrahedron of the Axis Mundi Merkaba - and we see it basically embodied in the mathematical proportions of the Great Pyramids themselves. The middle Pyramid is considered the dominant Pyramid because it represents the Ichthys of the Vesica Piscis.

Day 2 of Genesis is the union of Ma’at - the upward pointing star tetrahedron signifying light, yang, the Vesica Piscis of Day 1 of Genesis, the Sun (which is another reason why the coordinates of the Pyramids is the speed of light), and Thoth - the downward pointing star tetrahedron that signifies the Moon, yin, the Earth. What do we know to be the “work” of Day 2 of Genesis?

The water was separated from the land and the firmament was established to fine tune the atmosphere. That you recognize the pyramids functioned to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen is awesome because that was one of its functions. Purifying water is another and that explains the nearby Temple for Thoth and why he’s associated with the Ibis. Another, you correctly identified, has everything to do with harmonic resonance specifically directed towards renewing the fertility of the planet. Look directly beneath Orion’s Belt and you will see the constellation Lepus, the astronomical Easter Bunny. That’s why Phi, Fibonacci, the Golden Ratio are all part and parcel of the Pyramids construction - its purpose is also to anchor the harmonic resonance of fertility into the heart of the Earth’s harmonic grid - the center of the landmass.

A few contributors mentioned the Younger Dryas and that is also awesome of them. Kudos for that keen observation. Why is that important? Because the Earth was experiencing uncontrolled global warming right after coming out of the Ice Age and many scientists scratch their heads over what appeared to be an abrupt climate change event, the Younger Dryas, that effectively stopped it. For the next 1000 years, the planet experienced a mini-cold age, not so much an ice age, but a cold snap enough to stop the ice caps from fully melting. Neat when you think of how Scripture states a day for God is a thousand years on Earth (that’s relativity for ya). We know we get over 70% of our atmospheric oxygen from the ocean - from the phytoplankton - so a mass extinction event that likely preceded the actual Ice Age and perhaps the prior to the Younger Dryas could possibly have contributed to widespread ocean anoxia, thus making a contraption that could separate water into hydrogen and oxygen that much more necessary. That is consistent with the work of the 2nd Day of Genesis and the Axis Mundi union. Interesting.

Food for thought.

a reply to: seattletruth

so the chambers were designed for specific sounds...

What would happen if you added water to some or all chambers? Could this be a way to fine tune the exact frequency?

Maybe the "star windows" or "spirit escape shutes" are where the sound was meant to "come out" from? So the whole town could hear it or be influenced by it?

Or the star windows were another way to fine tune some specific property of the sound, by moving a block up and down the small passageways, like a giant version of a person manipulating the holes on a flute, or pressing the "buttons" on the top of a trumpet horn thing, or sliding the slidey thing on a trombone, etc... a way to "tune" the "instrument"?

It could've likely been surrounded by guards at all times, due to its importance, and most people had no idea of the truth of it. Like a WHOLE BUNCH of places today. Like Ft. Knox. Everybody wonders and spreads rumours but nobody really KNOWS, except the few who operate the place, and the owners, and the cream of the crop elite circles...

It could be the townsfolk thought it was alive, or that there was something inside it that was alive, a God, perhaps...and the elite priest class operated the machine to perform several "divine" acts, like great, powerful, terrifying groans and angry deafening roars, maybe they even had a happy, appeased, satisfied sound? I doubt it but we must consider all possibilities until this is solved.

Maybe, a person is meant to be laying in the isolation chamber while the sound is generated.

Ok, I'll finish reading the OP now. Thanks for sharing

Well, ill just leave this picture here, taken through a crack in -08 zoom in / adjust brightnes etc if you dont see anything.

a reply to: seattletruth

Question: Why do not people build pyramids in our time?

originally posted by: Judy21
a reply to: seattletruth

Question: Why do not people build pyramids in our time?

Terrible use of space.

There's a Vegas hotel shaped like a pyramid, but you have a huge footprint on the ground and less and less room for function space, shops, and guest rooms as you go higher. A tower shape (which they were unable to build in ancient Egypt) has a much smaller footprint and can hold many times the volume of a pyramid. A cube the height and width of a pyramid contains more than 1 1/2 times the space of the pyramid.

Pyramids nowadays are mostly gimmicks.